Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Delta Sells Compass and Mesaba >

Delta Sells Compass and Mesaba

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Delta Sells Compass and Mesaba

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-15-2010, 05:43 PM
  #471  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 691
Default

Originally Posted by iaflyer
Speaking of turboprops - why do you think almost no one else flies them? At one of the meetings, the network guys say people will book away from turboprops if they can: ie, take another airline who offers a jet, RJ or not.
Alaska uses them almost exclusively with Horizon. Alaska has also consistently turned a profit. I don't think most people can tell at the time of booking if they will be in a turbo prop or not. Furthermore, I'd venture a guess that the number one factor people look at while booking is price, even if it means an extra connection.
jayray2 is offline  
Old 07-15-2010, 06:06 PM
  #472  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Posts: 187
Default

Originally Posted by iceman49
Exactly, I called my reps and said the flow should be honored, there was a committment, if not follow the contract.
Check your PMs
Pro Fessional is offline  
Old 07-15-2010, 06:15 PM
  #473  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 593
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
I don't think they will kill the flow, or the flow down that is. My guess is they are attempting to kill the flow up, and hoping we will agree. They're probably thinking we will be happy so long as we have the flow down, and that they'll just keep the 76 seaters.

Thing is that doesn't fly with me. I'd just as soon work at Home Depot then flow down to a company owned by HK. If they want to kill any part of the flow, then 76 seaters will be parked.
Don't both parties (DALPA/MGT & MSA's MEC) have to agree to that...I can['t see Mesaba's MEC keeping around the flow if it doesn't benefit them...I'de rather see them get rid of it if it came to that...

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
That is an excellent point. Delta does not like the flow. They don't want to take seats out of aircraft or limit the Compass 175's. This is where DALPA enforcing the contract could help the Compass pilots. DALPA is directly representing the Delta pilots, but the Compass pilots could benefit.
The 900 is more efficient than the 175...but in any case if I was at Delta and with age 65 coming up i'de want the flow to go too, coming to Pinnacle or Trans States isn't the best flow down scenario
djrogs03 is offline  
Old 07-15-2010, 06:16 PM
  #474  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,556
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
I don't think they will kill the flow, or the flow down that is. My guess is they are attempting to kill the flow up, and hoping we will agree. They're probably thinking we will be happy so long as we have the flow down, and that they'll just keep the 76 seaters.

Thing is that doesn't fly with me. I'd just as soon work at Home Depot then flow down to a company owned by HK. If they want to kill any part of the flow, then 76 seaters will be parked.
The aircraft will not be parked. If the flow down is killed for whatever reason and invokes that clause in the contract they will just remove 6 seats. The 70 seat cap doesnt change so they will just add 4 more first class seats and take away 10 coach. They wont park the planes.
RiddleEagle18 is offline  
Old 07-15-2010, 06:20 PM
  #475  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NWA320pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 737 Capt
Posts: 1,166
Default

Originally Posted by RiddleEagle18
The aircraft will not be parked. If the flow down is killed for whatever reason and invokes that clause in the contract they will just remove 6 seats. The 70 seat cap doesnt change so they will just add 4 more first class seats and take away 10 coach. They wont park the planes.
There comes a point that removing seats makes an aircraft unprofitable.....
NWA320pilot is offline  
Old 07-15-2010, 06:33 PM
  #476  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,556
Default

Originally Posted by NWA320pilot
There comes a point that removing seats makes an aircraft unprofitable.....

Clearly delta wont fly a/c around that dont make money (all 50 seaters.)


If theres some way for you guys to pull these a/c up to mainline im all for it, but lets be real they will just add the 4 first class seats and pull 10 coach. Im not so sure that wouldnt be almost revenue neutral.

Dont forget they just signed long term contracts for these airplanes. Im sure they can get out of them but whats the expense on that?

Im just playing devils advocate to get ideas out there.


By the way I think hockey and johnso are right. DALPA enforcing thier contract may cause them to keep the flow around!!
RiddleEagle18 is offline  
Old 07-15-2010, 06:37 PM
  #477  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: B767
Posts: 814
Default

Originally Posted by djrogs03



The 900 is more efficient than the 175...but in any case if I was at Delta and with age 65 coming up i'de want the flow to go too, coming to Pinnacle or Trans States isn't the best flow down scenario
Why would you want the flow to go if you were at Delta? Quite frankly, flowing down to Mesaba or Compass before the sale wouldn't have been a great time either after working at Delta. The point is that the option was better to many junior pilots than being furloughed and unemployed. Sure there are some that would prefer to go work somewhere else but others are okay being a CA on the 175 rather than drawing unemployment or sweeping floors at Lowes.

The flow down also creates a financial burden for the company due to the training cycles that it would cause and therefore it provides an incentive for them to try and avoid furloughs. For every flow-down at Compass you would have essentially created 4 training cycles. (1 = flow back training at compass, 2 = flow back training at DL after recall, 3 = CPZ upgrade to replace flow back pilot, 4 = new hire or recalled CPZ pilot).
UnusualAttitude is offline  
Old 07-15-2010, 06:46 PM
  #478  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
The contract allows the flow to be canceled. I want the contract followed. The truth is terminating the flow is probably more beneficial to me as a junior Delta pilot. The furlough protection is gone now that Delta will not be paying Compass training costs. I have no intention of ever flowing down to Tran States even if I'm furloughed. I think terminating the flow and having the consequences written out in the contract enforced is the most beneficial thing to me. I'm not calling my reps to tell them my opinion because it would negatively affect another group. DALPA separated from Compass so we could not be sued for failure of duty to represent in situations like these. DALPA represents Delta pilots, not Compass. As long as the contract is followed and no scope is given up, I'm satisfied with the outcome.
Frankly, you make assumptions that you and probably the MEC do not know. Who pays the flow down costs? Ya think that maybe that is covered in the Sale Agreements and or the ASA?
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 07-15-2010, 06:48 PM
  #479  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
I never flowed up. I did it the old fashioned way and applied for the company I wanted to work for. Then, I interviewed for the company I wanted to work for. I don't know how what you mean by claiming I'm trying to screw everybody else.

If the flow is terminated the way the contract is worded (taking 6 seats out of a lot of 76 seaters and reducing the weight on the Compass jets), then it is probably more beneficial to me than the flow. That is if the contact is followed to the letter. The flow-down is useless to me now. I have no idea what's going to happened. There are very few Delta pilots willing to talk about this issue on here. I could be like everyone else and not comment. I have not given my opinion to anyone outside this board. Verbally attacking me probably won't hurt your cause, but I know it won't help it.
Curious. Did you come from a company that had a flow in place? Probably not, so you had not other choice but to apply and take a chance. Quite making apples to oranges comparisons.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 07-15-2010, 07:39 PM
  #480  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Capt
Posts: 2,049
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
If they want to kill any part of the flow, then 76 seaters will be parked.
If recent history and reputations hold up, I would not get my hopes up that any 76 seaters will be parked.
boog123 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PinnacleFO
Regional
53
12-13-2010 01:04 PM
vtx531
Regional
78
07-01-2010 06:36 PM
astrojet
Compass Airlines
2
07-01-2010 08:04 AM
Babur
Regional
158
09-15-2009 08:14 AM
Rotorhead
Major
0
01-27-2009 07:50 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices