Delta Sells Compass and Mesaba
#271
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: B737 CA
Posts: 1,518
The Comair guys significantly raised the bar for regional pilots. The contract they struck to get led directly to the signing of excellent contracts at Horizon and Air Wisconsin, in the same way that the NWA guys striking in 98 helped secure C2K at DL. Pattern bargaining, of course, plus providing management everywhere with a sobering look at the potential consequences if they don't play ball.
In the end, you're right, the strike and their increased costs made Comair a goat in Delta's eyes and they've been thrashed accordingly ever since, their flying farmed out elsewhere to lowest bidders. It's simply too easy to shift contracted flying around under current scope clauses for regional pilots to significantly raise the bar and not be beat down. My original response to you wasn't stating that the strike was ultimately good for Comair pilots, but it was something that we as trade unionists should recognize as a positive step for our profession rather than denigrate.
#272
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: B737 CA
Posts: 1,518
And for what it's worth, I'm not a big fan of the RJDC, JD Lawson, or the despicable CMR policy of making DL furloughees resign their DL seniority. I just feel the more unity there is across airlines and across regional-major lines, the stronger ALPA will be.
#273
Wow. I'm glad someone finally said it.
I have tried more times than I care to count to explain to people that this was not a "Comair Pilot Group" decision, but a "JC Lawson" decision. I've heard the argument that the Comair Pilots should have "done something" to stop it if they really didn't approve of it. Somehow my retort of, "Just like we can stop LM from doing something we don't approve of? " doesn't seem to register.
I understand the frustration and apparent feeling of betrayal that a wholly-owned subsidiary won't accept the parent company's pilots when they are furloughing. And I'm truly sorry all of those pilots hit the street without a job - I've been there, and it sucks. But this was truly a case of 2 Regional MEC Chairmen attempting to prove whose **** was bigger, and Lawson lost that egocentric game, at his Pilot Group's expense. I hate that the Comair Pilot Group is still paying the price after all these years, due to misplaced blame.
Sorry for the thread hijack - I'm just so relieved to hear that someone else "gets it," and I couldn't help but chime in.
I have tried more times than I care to count to explain to people that this was not a "Comair Pilot Group" decision, but a "JC Lawson" decision. I've heard the argument that the Comair Pilots should have "done something" to stop it if they really didn't approve of it. Somehow my retort of, "Just like we can stop LM from doing something we don't approve of? " doesn't seem to register.
I understand the frustration and apparent feeling of betrayal that a wholly-owned subsidiary won't accept the parent company's pilots when they are furloughing. And I'm truly sorry all of those pilots hit the street without a job - I've been there, and it sucks. But this was truly a case of 2 Regional MEC Chairmen attempting to prove whose **** was bigger, and Lawson lost that egocentric game, at his Pilot Group's expense. I hate that the Comair Pilot Group is still paying the price after all these years, due to misplaced blame.
Sorry for the thread hijack - I'm just so relieved to hear that someone else "gets it," and I couldn't help but chime in.
#274
Can't abide NAI
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,049
I saw pilots standing up to JC Lawson and saying it was a bad idea, even Comair pilots.
I told him it was a bad idea standing in the hall underneath ATL gate C23 when he came to town.
I told him it was a bad idea standing in the hall underneath ATL gate C23 when he came to town.
Last edited by Bucking Bar; 07-06-2010 at 12:28 PM.
#275
Can't abide NAI
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,049
Scope and Compass were big. It was all over the L&G thread, a website was created called Combine Compass and then the LEC elections happened and there was a lot of anti-LM rancor leading up to those. Not to mention LOA's coming out of nowhere signed sealed and delivered and people bieng upset. Not to mention the whole CPZ MEC split issue. And then there were complaints about communication with DALPA. The silence from the MEC and LM was replaced with fears the MEC wasn't protecting only a portion of the pilot group.
Then things improved in the communication side significantly with a better flow of the quality of information which was greatly appreciated especially as we went into the HND, CPZ MEC split and slot swap. We started to get more insight into the MEC and a lot of things began to make more sense as time and company events unfolded. Although much of the communication has had to be limited for good reason. Operating in silence isn't a bad thing.
Then things improved in the communication side significantly with a better flow of the quality of information which was greatly appreciated especially as we went into the HND, CPZ MEC split and slot swap. We started to get more insight into the MEC and a lot of things began to make more sense as time and company events unfolded. Although much of the communication has had to be limited for good reason. Operating in silence isn't a bad thing.
Threats on the horizon are:
- Compass will fight their scope restrictions and / or unilateral flow
- Compass may join Teamsters
- Compass, or one of the other larger outsourced labor groups may threaten ALPA's exclusivity on Delta bargaining
- Pilots will continue to question ALPA's role. Out of frustration will call for decertification. Decertification would be disastrous for Delta pilots as such a move would fall right into the hands of those who want our seat at the table
It is difficult to say if there has been any changes in our Chairman's actual positions. I suspected his promotion of flow through agreements was political, but many disagreed and believe his sincerity on the subject. His talking points have been updated and are more respectful of those with scope concerns.
Our current scope isn't as strong as it could be, because it does not make a lot of objective sense. The regional guys will eventually leverage these weaknesses and ally with management if we get forced into concessionary bargaining. Holes, as I see them:
- Manufacturers, the FAA and Airlines see aircraft as Types. The E175 is a family of jets capable of 122 seats / 4,200 miles. In effect, we have outsourced the 100 seat Type. By not recapturing it, we risk losing it. (I think we'll hold on around the current limits, but it will be tough fight because it just isn't a very clear objective line)
- The 76 seat limit is an economic compromise built around bankruptcy data. If we increase our pay rates, pressure will increase to operate these aircraft to their full capacities. Worse if we are in concessionary bargaining and the Company just really needs to maximize revenue.
- We still have a very fragmented group of pilots doing the bottom half of Delta flying. As the heat gets turned up, they will look for ways to protect their jobs entering into concessionary bargaining which further upsets the 76 seat compromise.
Last edited by Bucking Bar; 07-06-2010 at 01:57 PM.
#277
Can't abide NAI
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,049
PM sent. Mostly got burned out on APC. Figured I would skip the "I told you so's" and wait until there was some actual new negotiations to try to weigh in on.
The sale of Compass was yesterday's news the minute the representational vote was tallied. Now management wants to negotiate scope. Those "discussions" are the actual news, since they presage future activity.
The sale of Compass was yesterday's news the minute the representational vote was tallied. Now management wants to negotiate scope. Those "discussions" are the actual news, since they presage future activity.
#278
Bar,
Welcome back. I was hoping to see what you thought about all this. Good stuff, let me reread #277 above a few more times and take it all in.
You're still the best informed guy on regional issues I've read. Thanks for taking time to post.
Ferd
Welcome back. I was hoping to see what you thought about all this. Good stuff, let me reread #277 above a few more times and take it all in.
You're still the best informed guy on regional issues I've read. Thanks for taking time to post.
Ferd
#279
[HTML]IF the Compass guys get shellacked and fight it, then he, UGBSM and Brake Chatter will have a whole new group to enjoy beating down. Save your torches and pitchforks boys for the next group of uppidty regional pilots./HTML]
Do you really want to have this conversation?
Do you really want to have this conversation?
#280
[HTML]IF the Compass guys get shellacked and fight it, then he, UGBSM and Brake Chatter will have a whole new group to enjoy beating down. Save your torches and pitchforks boys for the next group of uppidty regional pilots./HTML]
Do you really want to have this conversation?
Do you really want to have this conversation?
The only thing bringing up all of this stuff that happened eight plus years ago does is reopen very deep wounds. It is divisive and helps no one.
CPS guys learn from the past. There may be opportunities here, but presupposing the debate is not a good primer.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post