Delta Sells Compass and Mesaba
#151
OK guys, I finally dug up NWA LOA 2006-14 to see exactly what it says about termination of flow after selling Compass. Here's the language:
Therefore, the language in the CBA that states that the 71-76 seater cap reverts downward if the "flow provisions of LOA 2006-10 and 2006-14 cease to be available" appears to be superseded by the language within the LOA itself. Compass can cancel the flow up, only the flow down has to remain in place.
Therefore, the language in the CBA that states that the 71-76 seater cap reverts downward if the "flow provisions of LOA 2006-10 and 2006-14 cease to be available" appears to be superseded by the language within the LOA itself. Compass can cancel the flow up, only the flow down has to remain in place.
Do you think that the CPS MEC would willfully give the DAL pilots flow down rights without their quid of a flow up? Would them canceling the flow for us(down) meet the requirements of the PWA stipulating the setback proviso being triggered when the flow becomes unavailable? 153-85 76 seat RJ's)
#152
As the flow will likely be canceled, I cannot see Delta hiring large numbers of CPZ and Mesaba pilots with the existing pool of applicants out there. If anything, I would expect Delta to move away from hiring pilots in large numbers from these 2 carriers as this would likely disrupt their ability to feed for Delta...the very reason Delta is likely selling these 2 carriers. This was one of the inherent problems in the flow-up in Delta's eyes.
It seems that future attrition at Delta due to retirements will be your strongest form of job protection going forward.
It seems that future attrition at Delta due to retirements will be your strongest form of job protection going forward.
#153
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 309
Just a question(s):
Do you think that the CPS MEC would willfully give the DAL pilots flow down rights without their quid of a flow up? Would them canceling the flow for us(down) meet the requirements of the PWA stipulating the setback proviso being triggered when the flow becomes unavailable? 153-85 76 seat RJ's)
Do you think that the CPS MEC would willfully give the DAL pilots flow down rights without their quid of a flow up? Would them canceling the flow for us(down) meet the requirements of the PWA stipulating the setback proviso being triggered when the flow becomes unavailable? 153-85 76 seat RJ's)
They might be able to negotiate away the DAL pilots flow down rights ( at a "cost" I'm sure) come contract time or thru a LOA, but I'm not so sure the CPS MEC is in the position to "give/take" anything in regards to the flow down since these seem to be the blueprints the company was founded on.
#155
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 309
#156
See the best thing about this is, it is in our contract, and if they just cancel the flow as they are allowed to and these guys to not flow up, you know that they will take the nuclear option and nuke our flowdown rights. That is bad for Ma Delta because they will need to park or block off a lot of seat and then pull them out as the seat trigger will be activated.
Best thing to do is take a slow deliberate approach to this. The first flows get system number in August and more each month after that. We need to study this long and hard. It has far reaching ramifications for all pilots. Time is on our side.
Best thing to do is take a slow deliberate approach to this. The first flows get system number in August and more each month after that. We need to study this long and hard. It has far reaching ramifications for all pilots. Time is on our side.
#157
I would want to know how much it costs to train a new CPZ pilot/captain? The flow-up would result in tremendous cost I would think (wasn't there a ratio of CPZ/Mesaba required in each newhire Delta class?) to CPZ, owned by Delta. The best way around this would be to dump CPZ and Mesaba to Hulas and Pinnacle. Now Delta would no longer have to honor flow ups based on language in the LOA. Let Hulas deal with it. Also, could there be a backroom deal between Delta management and Hulas to limit the number of pilots taken from CPZ? If I'm Hulas and I acquire CPZ, I wouldn't want to get stuck holding the bag and paying for aforementioned training costs resulting from a continuation of flow.
Also, how large is the pool of applicants to Delta right now? I've heard numbers ranging from 2100 to over 10,000. Which is it? There are probably some highly qualified applicants in that pool who Delta would like to hire who might otherwise not get a chance if the flow-ups were to occur as stipulated. Were the flow-ups scheduled to interview like other applicants to Delta? Or were they simply going to be entitled to a slot on the basis of their employment/seniority at CPZ or Pinnacle?
#158
Anyway, us CPZ folks have our fingers crossed and are hoping for the best, but are not anywhere near optimistic. So I'm just going to the cabin for the weekend to fish and drink a couple hundred beers.
Happy 4th, everyone! Have a great weekend!
#160
Unfortunately, I don't think time is on our side. As I was led to believe (by the president of CPZ), there is a 60-day window to renegotiate the terms of the flow. If there is no new agreement in place, Compass management is required to cancel the flow-up provision per the CPZ PWA. This was a stipulation of the TSH purchase agreement that DAL required.
Anyway, us CPZ folks have our fingers crossed and are hoping for the best, but are not anywhere near optimistic. So I'm just going to the cabin for the weekend to fish and drink a couple hundred beers.
Happy 4th, everyone! Have a great weekend!
Anyway, us CPZ folks have our fingers crossed and are hoping for the best, but are not anywhere near optimistic. So I'm just going to the cabin for the weekend to fish and drink a couple hundred beers.
Happy 4th, everyone! Have a great weekend!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post