Ual/cal Scope
#41
I have heard this before and not sure I see the logic/reason??
If CAL went under UAL's work rules, how would it "create" jobs??? If UAL's rules were going to do so, how come not a single UAL furlough has been brought back. Didn't the the most recent furlough just take place as recent as this past fall/winter of 2009??? I have not heard of any 'new'/or recently changed rules that would all of a sudden make this happen either??
If I'm missing something, I'd really like to know the reasoning for this fact (no sarcasm in this question).
If CAL went under UAL's work rules, how would it "create" jobs??? If UAL's rules were going to do so, how come not a single UAL furlough has been brought back. Didn't the the most recent furlough just take place as recent as this past fall/winter of 2009??? I have not heard of any 'new'/or recently changed rules that would all of a sudden make this happen either??
If I'm missing something, I'd really like to know the reasoning for this fact (no sarcasm in this question).
SO if you were to add CAL's 350 aircraft to United's fleet and UAL has to staff something like 2 pilots more per airframe (just a guess), then you have an additional 700 pilot positions.
#42
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Posts: 172
I guess after watching what happened to YX and also seeing how management uses chapter 11 as to destroy scope it seems like it will be hard for UA/CO to keep more 70 seaters off property. I really hope I am wrong but it always seems like this battle goes in favor of management.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post