Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
UAL firms order for Rolls Royce powered A350 >

UAL firms order for Rolls Royce powered A350

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

UAL firms order for Rolls Royce powered A350

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-16-2010, 05:45 PM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Fritzthepilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Posts: 230
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
I really don't want to get into this. I have no ill will towards any of you guys. Too bad you cannot say the same. You conveniently blame the DAL pilots in the same breath as DAL management for everything from the demise of Eastern to the Lindbergh baby. Sorry I'm not biting on that one. Oh, but one last thing. I lost 46% of my pay and my pension too, so in that respect, we are on the same page.
No, we are not going to get into this. Did I say Delta was responsible for the problems? Nope. Did I say Delta caused the downfall of Eastern? Nope. You bit on all of those in your response, but I did get a laugh out of the Lindbergh baby crack. I did ask how many rEAL pilots did Delta interview.

I was simply defending another pilot. I have no ill will towards you. When I see other pilots actively working against my benefit, it repulses me. I have seen enough of that in the past 10 years to fill my career.

If you carry a picket sign, I would be more than willing to carry one alongside you. What benefits you will eventually benefit me. What harms you will eventually harm me.
Fritzthepilot is offline  
Old 03-16-2010, 05:59 PM
  #32  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by Fritzthepilot
I did ask how many rEAL pilots did Delta interview..
I have no idea. Is that germain to our discussion and if so, how would the DAL pilots have any say so in that?



Originally Posted by Fritzthepilot
I was simply defending another pilot. I have no ill will towards you. When I see other pilots actively working against my benefit, it repulses me. I have seen enough of that in the past 10 years to fill my career.

If you carry a picket sign, I would be more than willing to carry one alongside you. What benefits you will eventually benefit me. What harms you will eventually harm me.
we have all seen enough of that in our careers. And in your last paragraph.. you are correct sir.
tsquare is offline  
Old 03-16-2010, 07:55 PM
  #33  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 172
Default

Originally Posted by Fritzthepilot
At United during the same time, he witnessed a major US international carrier pilot group take a pay cut in an attempt to put a nail in the United coffin. He witnessed some pilot groups initiate a letter writing campaign to prevent United from getting an ATSB loan guarantee.
Very telling that not one of the responses to your above statement has generated a rebuttal. I was disgusted by the NWA ALPA and DAL ALPA campaigns against the UA ATSB loan request. Believe me when I say that these acts against the United pilots have not been forgotten.
skypest is offline  
Old 03-16-2010, 09:58 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Position: Le Bus
Posts: 382
Default

Originally Posted by skypest
Very telling that not one of the responses to your above statement has generated a rebuttal. I was disgusted by the NWA ALPA and DAL ALPA campaigns against the UA ATSB loan request. Believe me when I say that these acts against the United pilots have not been forgotten.
Yep, I sure remember.
SOTeric is offline  
Old 03-17-2010, 03:51 AM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,576
Default

Skypest,

Do you have any proof of a concerted effort that nwa alpa was campaigning against ual's loan request? I think you are painting with a very large brush. Were there individuals writing letters? Probably. The bulk of us realized what this was. It was a resetting of the industry/profession due to an aligning of the stars so to speak. You and usair were the weakest links and were picked off first, followed by nwa and dal. AA, capitulated early (my guess is believing they had the most to gain with your demise). Now, if you and your buddy on here with 27 years would like to thump your chests and point fingers, might I point out Ual alpas dealings with the original frontier. Pot meet kettle......



Originally Posted by skypest
Very telling that not one of the responses to your above statement has generated a rebuttal. I was disgusted by the NWA ALPA and DAL ALPA campaigns against the UA ATSB loan request. Believe me when I say that these acts against the United pilots have not been forgotten.
NERD is offline  
Old 03-17-2010, 04:22 AM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: B-777 left
Posts: 1,415
Default

Originally Posted by NERD
Skypest,

Do you have any proof of a concerted effort that nwa alpa was campaigning against ual's loan request? I think you are painting with a very large brush. Were there individuals writing letters? Probably. The bulk of us realized what this was. It was a resetting of the industry/profession due to an aligning of the stars so to speak. You and usair were the weakest links and were picked off first, followed by nwa and dal. AA, capitulated early (my guess is believing they had the most to gain with your demise). Now, if you and your buddy on here with 27 years would like to thump your chests and point fingers, might I point out Ual alpas dealings with the original frontier. Pot meet kettle......
Nerd,
I did not thump my chest but yes that type of stuff with regards to alpa at nwa and other places does bother me. The loan request did but what bothered me more is when the nwa alpa volunteered a 15% paycut to try to push ual into ch-7. Now that was nice alpa brother.
syd111 is offline  
Old 03-17-2010, 05:19 AM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,576
Default

Nice what you did to your Frontier alpa brothers. With 27 years you were a part of that. Now, do you really think that the pilots of NWA voted for a 15% cut with the thinking that it would help drive UAL out of business, or do you think it was an attempt to stabilize the company and avoid ch11? Do you really think little ole NWA (being half the size of ual) could do this? Where is your anger at the APA? They bent over early and took it deep with just the threat of ch11. Who do you think would have gained the most by your demise? We (NWA) were the last to take concessions. As a matter of fact we got pay raises after you were in ch11 for over a year and did not take any concessions until you had been in over 2. Also, don't forget who went on strike in 1998 to get this pattern bargaining game going in the right direction again after the givebacks of the early 90s. Without our sacrifice there would have been no Delta dot and thus no contract 2000. So save your indignation for someone else.


Originally Posted by syd111
Nerd,
I did not thump my chest but yes that type of stuff with regards to alpa at nwa and other places does bother me. The loan request did but what bothered me more is when the nwa alpa volunteered a 15% paycut to try to push ual into ch-7. Now that was nice alpa brother.
NERD is offline  
Old 03-17-2010, 05:27 AM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: B-777 left
Posts: 1,415
Default

Originally Posted by NERD
Nice what you did to your Frontier alpa brothers. With 27 years you were a part of that. Now, do you really think that the pilots of NWA voted for a 15% cut with the thinking that it would help drive UAL out of business, or do you think it was an attempt to stabilize the company and avoid ch11? Do you really think little ole NWA (being half the size of ual) could do this? Where is your anger at the APA? They bent over early and took it deep with just the threat of ch11. Who do you think would have gained the most by your demise? We (NWA) were the last to take concessions. As a matter of fact we got pay raises after you were in ch11 for over a year and did not take any concessions until you had been in over 2. Also, don't forget who went on strike in 1998 to get this pattern bargaining game going in the right direction again after the givebacks of the early 90s. Without our sacrifice there would have been no Delta dot and thus no contract 2000. So save your indignation for someone else.
Yes that is what I think nwa did and have been told by enough to know that it is true. It will not be forgotten, save your preaching for someone else. I am comfortable where I have been in all the fights.
syd111 is offline  
Old 03-17-2010, 08:02 AM
  #39  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 172
Default

Originally Posted by NERD
Skypest,

Do you have any proof of a concerted effort that nwa alpa was campaigning against ual's loan request? I think you are painting with a very large brush. Were there individuals writing letters? Probably. The bulk of us realized what this was. It was a resetting of the industry/profession due to an aligning of the stars so to speak. You and usair were the weakest links and were picked off first, followed by nwa and dal. AA, capitulated early (my guess is believing they had the most to gain with your demise). Now, if you and your buddy on here with 27 years would like to thump your chests and point fingers, might I point out Ual alpas dealings with the original frontier. Pot meet kettle......
Nerd,
If you re-read my statement you will see no chest beating.
So you now defend the actions of your association on a "aligning of the stars". Nice.
I was not at United when the original Frontier was around so..... no need to introduce me to any kettle.
skypest is offline  
Old 03-17-2010, 09:57 AM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TonyWilliams's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Self employed
Posts: 3,048
Default

Glad we got that all off our chests. How about that firm order for Rolls Royce powered A350's? Do you think a different engine would have been a better choice? How will UAL pay for them?
TonyWilliams is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
PEACH
Major
90
08-20-2009 05:01 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices