Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Republic Seniority

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-18-2010, 05:06 AM
  #271  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 643
Default

Have any of the RAH guys read an SLI arbitration decision by Kasher or Eichen? I am not trying to be antagonistic here.

Anything can and probably will happen, but the last SLI that included anything close to DOH was UAL/Pan Am. Since then, the last 25+ years, every SLI that made it to an arbitrator has been some form of "category and class" integration.

From Eischen, "In constructing this list, we have inquired as to where the respective groups have been and we have made reasoned judgments as to where they were going. We have attempted, at all times, to recognize reasonable expectations of both parties while, in all instances,
rejecting proposals that, however facially logical, resulted in untenable windfalls."

This was from an SLI that used "pre-merger hourly rates, performance capacities and missions of the aircraft" to align the integration.
zoooropa is offline  
Old 01-18-2010, 05:38 AM
  #272  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: retired
Posts: 992
Default

Originally Posted by ToiletDuck
There were 16 717s on property that were scheduled to be forfeited back to Boeing at a predetermined time before RAH ever became part of the equation. I believe it was this management mixup that brought RAH into the picture in the first place.
The timeline is starting to get a little fuzzy, but I beleive there were still 25 717s when RAH showed up. The MD80s were being parked, and the plan according to the training schedule, was to reduce the 717 number to 21.
Dougdrvr is offline  
Old 01-18-2010, 05:42 AM
  #273  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,026
Default

Originally Posted by flyguy81
don't forget that FO's can't move airplanes here.

So if a furloughed YX pilot is recalled to a 170...there's no going to a airbus as a FO.

And staple is stupid....will never happen. I'd venture a guess to say there's a lot more "lifers" at RAH then you'd think. Their QOL shouldn't be compromised cause some ****ed off YX and F9 people think they're better than everyone else cause their plane is bigger.

I don't know what's fair or what's equitable....that's why I'm not negotiating it....I fully expect to get screwed so at least I won't be surprised.
First officers are allowed to switch airplanes. They just have to switch to a higher paying position. Since a 100-seater first officer pays $37/hour max while a 37-seat first officer pays $37/hour max, you can't switch. There are 155 out of 2000+ pilots that have been at Republic 10+ years. That's not very many lifers. If you work at Republic, you can't get screwed. A complete staple below Midwest and Frontier would still put you at a future mainline carrier while never having to even interview. That is assuming Republic is in business in a few years. If the company starts bleeding money, it goes extremely fast.

Originally Posted by IMHO
Gee I wish someone had told me that mergers were done by salary before I typed all that up.
Mergers are done by career expectations. Career expectations are salary, work rules, and retirement. Your salary, work rules, and retirement are inferior in every way.
hockeypilot44 is offline  
Old 01-18-2010, 06:20 AM
  #274  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 61
Default

Originally Posted by Great Santini

IMHO,
Your SLI proposal would be funny, except that I don't think you were trying to be funny. You just outlined what could be the greatest "windfall" in airline history for the RAH guys. Looks like the F9 guys would give up the most and the YX guys wouldn't get nearly as much as the already lost.

In any case, if something so absurd were handed down by the arbitrator, you could have my Captain seat as well. I won't stick around to be part of that circus.
Well its no secret that i'm not an arbitor. But after reading 27 pages of bickering, finger pointing, and name calling, I figured I might as well make this thread a little interesting. The inherent problem with this whole ordeal is that its virtually unprecedented. Sure we can point to other "mergers" of the past, but can we point to a "merger" where the acquiring carrier is a regional airline by industry standards, one of the acquired companies is in bankruptcy and in debt to in this case RAH, and the other "acquired" company was in financial ruin at the time of acquisition (regardless of how or why that came about) In a perfect world, YX pilots and F9 pilots would be merged by DOH, probably screwing the F9 pilots in the process but hey, YX pilots made more so they are entitled to more. But lets talk about precedent. When have you ever observed a "merger" or "acquisition" where the employees of the purchasing carrier got shafted. IF YX and F9 pilots wanted a complete staple, then one of those airlines should have purchased a bankrupt RAH. That didnt happen. Besides, I'm not saying that my little made up SLI example was the end all be all of fairness, it was merely a way to get the thread a bit more productive. So far I've only seen people talk about what isnt fair. So I ask what is fair? And dont say staple.
IMHO is offline  
Old 01-18-2010, 06:30 AM
  #275  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 523
Default

Originally Posted by IMHO
Well its no secret that i'm not an arbitor. But after reading 27 pages of bickering, finger pointing, and name calling, I figured I might as well make this thread a little interesting. The inherent problem with this whole ordeal is that its virtually unprecedented. Sure we can point to other "mergers" of the past, but can we point to a "merger" where the acquiring carrier is a regional airline by industry standards, one of the acquired companies is in bankruptcy and in debt to in this case RAH, and the other "acquired" company was in financial ruin at the time of acquisition (regardless of how or why that came about) In a perfect world, YX pilots and F9 pilots would be merged by DOH, probably screwing the F9 pilots in the process but hey, YX pilots made more so they are entitled to more. But lets talk about precedent. When have you ever observed a "merger" or "acquisition" where the employees of the purchasing carrier got shafted. IF YX and F9 pilots wanted a complete staple, then one of those airlines should have purchased a bankrupt RAH. That didnt happen. Besides, I'm not saying that my little made up SLI example was the end all be all of fairness, it was merely a way to get the thread a bit more productive. So far I've only seen people talk about what isnt fair. So I ask what is fair? And dont say staple.
The valujet pilots got the worse end of the stick in their purchase/merger of AirTran. So yes it has happened.
likeitis is offline  
Old 01-18-2010, 07:23 AM
  #276  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 798
Default

Originally Posted by ToiletDuck
There were 16 717s on property that were scheduled to be forfeited back to Boeing at a predetermined time before RAH ever became part of the equation. I believe it was this management mixup that brought RAH into the picture in the first place.

Rev BB brought RAH into Midwest to find a home for 12-E170 (and Midwest parks 12-MD80) returned by the Frontier bankruptcy. Midwest was still flying 25-B717.

BB wanted/needed a "Branded Airline" and his entry into Midwest was more then contract flying.


Duane Pfennigwerth – Raymond James
Can you just qualitatively talk about Midwest, how that operation is performing and if you're seeing payment terms that are acceptable to you from Midwest?

Bryan Bedford

Well, clearly, the payment terms are much less favorable than what we had with Frontier, which is one of the reasons that gave cause to a $215 million claim being filed against the estate of Frontier Airlines.
As far as Midwest performance, they do continue to perform. We're probably a little more intimate with their restructuring plans than what we might be with other partners. I can tell you they are having terrific success in the restructuring process and we believe Midwest is going to continue to be beyond the aviation landscape for years to come.
MD80 is offline  
Old 01-18-2010, 07:38 AM
  #277  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,919
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
First officers are allowed to switch airplanes. They just have to switch to a higher paying position. Since a 100-seater first officer pays $37/hour max while a 37-seat first officer pays $37/hour max, you can't switch. There are 155 out of 2000+ pilots that have been at Republic 10+ years. That's not very many lifers. If you work at Republic, you can't get screwed. A complete staple below Midwest and Frontier would still put you at a future mainline carrier while never having to even interview. That is assuming Republic is in business in a few years. If the company starts bleeding money, it goes extremely fast.



Mergers are done by career expectations. Career expectations are salary, work rules, and retirement. Your salary, work rules, and retirement are inferior in every way.

There's where you're wrong.

Per the CBA, "FO's shall be frozen in status and equipment type until eligible to upgrade to a captain position."

If you think the company will agree to let FO's move to another airplane, you're crazy. They'll fill the airbus or whatever with new hires to keep overhead low. This place sucks.
flyguy81 is offline  
Old 01-18-2010, 07:53 AM
  #278  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: retired
Posts: 992
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
That is assuming Republic is in business in a few years. If the company starts bleeding money, it goes extremely fast.


If you read between the lines, it's already looking bleak. The tone in BB's last few letters is telling. He's already whinning about the cost of fuel and the departure of key management people and low morale. By the time he realizes that these items that don't necessarily show on the balance sheet are critical, it may be too late.
Dougdrvr is offline  
Old 01-18-2010, 08:46 AM
  #279  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2009
Position: Right 737
Posts: 85
Default

IMHO,

AWA acquiring USA did not work out so well for the pilots, imho.

I would agree though, your post did inject some activity into this thread.
Kdog18 is offline  
Old 01-18-2010, 10:18 AM
  #280  
Che Guevara
 
ToiletDuck's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
If you work at Republic, you can't get screwed. A complete staple below Midwest and Frontier would still put you at a future mainline carrier while never having to even interview.
Think before you post. A complete staple below two pilot groups would affect everyone bumped down the list.
ToiletDuck is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
StormChaser
Major
378
08-10-2009 12:25 PM
CANAM
Frontier
206
06-26-2009 11:47 PM
forgot to bid
Major
242
05-27-2009 11:26 AM
Nevets
Union Talk
42
03-01-2009 08:41 PM
av8tordude
Regional
2
09-03-2008 05:30 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices