Swa 1844 Bhm-phx 12/13
03-29-2010, 09:24 AM
#101
The NeverEnding Story
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,603
Originally Posted by goaround2000
The user that goes by the name I_love_lamp is on the XJT seniority list, and although he used his current company's benefits on said flight; our jumpseat committees had to clear up the air due to the misrepresentation on behalf of both the original poster and other members on both side of the fence. This was done in an effort to minimize the impact on jumpseaters for both carriers as facts only support the actions of an individual and not a the whole group.
Guess there must be a LOT left unmentioned here if XJT's Jumpseat Chair thought it an important-enough issue to "address" a furloughed pilot working for a different airline filing a civil lawsuit against a third airline due to a lost bag...
03-29-2010, 09:57 AM
#102
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Position: ERJ145 Captain
Posts: 473
I'm curious, how did I_L_L "misrepresent" himself? Even though he's furloughed XJT, he works for a completely different airline in a non-flying capacity and was traveling as such (presumably without any connection whatsoever to XJT).
Guess there must be a LOT left unmentioned here if XJT's Jumpseat Chair thought it an important-enough issue to "address" a furloughed pilot working for a different airline filing a civil lawsuit against a third airline due to a lost bag...
Guess there must be a LOT left unmentioned here if XJT's Jumpseat Chair thought it an important-enough issue to "address" a furloughed pilot working for a different airline filing a civil lawsuit against a third airline due to a lost bag...
It seems that this went from an individual associated with XYZ airline suing SWA, to XJT pilot suing SWA. The aforementioned Chair was making sure that because this was being discussed openly in forums and other mediums, that everyone understood that this had nothing to do with our company or our group. A couple of our guys were approached about it on the line, and a couple of our guys that went to SWA also expressed concern, because what was being said was that an XJT pilot was suing SWA over trivial matters.
Whether or not I agree with lamp's actions is completely irrelevant, the clarification that said individual has nothing to do with us, is what's important.
03-29-2010, 06:13 PM
#103
Line Holder
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: EMB-145 furloughee
Posts: 63
03-29-2010, 06:57 PM
#104
Line Holder
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B-737 F/O
Posts: 82
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
