Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
United to order Boeing and Airbus >

United to order Boeing and Airbus

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

United to order Boeing and Airbus

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-08-2009, 10:31 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
REAL Pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 225
Default

Originally Posted by syd111
Agree real pilot. What you see on this site much of the time is many of your alpa brothers knocking ual no matter what move they make. I assume it is the same brothers that hoped ual would liquidate in the past or now.
Thanks for your perspective. I come from an Eastern family and have seen the industry first hand for 40 years and most of it is infuriating. It reminds me of the movie Braveheart where the nobels (ALPA, mgt, gov,)were so busy grabbing the scraps for themselves, that the people (line pilot) were the ones to suffer.

It is way past time for an SOS and industry resolve. We watched USAIR get raped and then UAL, DAL, NW each got in line for the same. The future holds many challenges but fear the same results.

Carpe Diem
REAL Pilot is offline  
Old 12-08-2009, 10:43 AM
  #22  
Fore!
 
Tony Nelson's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: 756 F/O
Posts: 505
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
My comments had no hope in them. It was what the street was talking about, noting more nothing less.
The Street isn't always 100% correct.
Tony Nelson is offline  
Old 12-08-2009, 11:42 AM
  #23  
Moderate Moderator
 
UAL T38 Phlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Curator at Static Display
Posts: 5,681
Default Possible Reason for Fleet Split

I don't know much about the 787 or A350, but I was surprised that UAL ordered equal amounts of seemingly similar aircraft. But maybe it was an astute move:

Could it be that UAL got Boeing and Airbus to bid against each other, hoping for a landfall deal of 50 jets, and lowered the price? Then, UAL locked those prices...and split the order 25-25.

I don't see it as fleet growth, just replacement. But if the lease costs are the same as the jets they replace, and maintenance/fuel burn really are reduced, it could tip the ink from red to black.
UAL T38 Phlyer is offline  
Old 12-08-2009, 11:43 AM
  #24  
I'd rather be cycling.
 
TJohn's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Dreaming right!!!
Posts: 47
Default

Originally Posted by theparrot
Granted... I don't know much about these two new aircraft, but this order doesn't seem to make much sense to me. Aren't both of these aircraft designed with the same basic segment, 200-300 seats, in mind? Why would an airline want two different makes of aircraft, with all the associated differences in maintenance, spares, etc., that basically fit the same market niche? Someone in the know please enlighten me...
Now you see the problem of UAL's management that we've had to deal with? **** never changes with these ****wads in charge.
TJohn is offline  
Old 12-08-2009, 11:46 AM
  #25  
Works Every Weekend
 
Check Essential's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: 737 ATL
Posts: 3,506
Default

Originally Posted by syd111
What you see on this site much of the time is many of your alpa brothers knocking ual no matter what move they make. I assume it is the same brothers that hoped ual would liquidate in the past or now.
We're competitors. Everyone wants their team to win. Human nature.
Don't be offended. Its not personal.

Besides, nobody really wants United to liquidate. That would be horrible.

USAir however ..........

(just kidding)
Check Essential is offline  
Old 12-08-2009, 12:11 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: B-777 left
Posts: 1,415
Default

Originally Posted by Check Essential
We're competitors. Everyone wants their team to win. Human nature.
Don't be offended. Its not personal.

Besides, nobody really wants United to liquidate. That would be horrible.

USAir however ..........

(just kidding)
Thanks for pointing that out to me about being competitors I had not realized that before. But now that you mention it I guess I should not give my "competitors" free rides to work. But hey don't be offended, it's not personal.
syd111 is offline  
Old 12-08-2009, 12:46 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Default

TJohn,

You can't delete it, but you certainly can edit it down to nothing. So I'm not going to quote it. Besides, it'll probably get pulled down.

So get it modified, then maybe go for a run, or something. I've been through the furlough experience, I've been there. I'm sorry you're there now. But the sooner you can move beyond the anger stage, the better your life will be.

Good luck (and I mean that sincerely).

...

As for the order: good for United, I suppose. Nobody here knows if that's good for pilots or not. I suspect that the next phase in your history will involve some sort of transformation (i.e. a merger), and that UAL would emerge as the number one carrier, with a great network. Whether the revenue will pick up fast enough to overcome the debt burden is anyone's guess.

We are competitors, and I don't prefer for UAL (or AMR) to come out on top, but both have enormous potential, and both are underestimated at one's peril. It would be silly for anyone (especially management) to spend even an ounce of energy dissing United, when our company should be focused solely on burying them, and we should be focused on our own jobs.
Sink r8 is offline  
Old 12-08-2009, 12:48 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
REAL Pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 225
Default

Love the fact you used quotes. This thin skinned, legalistic society kills me. Forget about playing fair, just sue.

Calling Wyatt Earp...............

Carpe Diem

Last edited by FDXer; 12-08-2009 at 05:15 PM. Reason: Quote removed for TOS violations
REAL Pilot is offline  
Old 12-08-2009, 12:48 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Default

Originally Posted by syd111
Thanks for pointing that out to me about being competitors I had not realized that before. But now that you mention it I guess I should not give my "competitors" free rides to work. But hey don't be offended, it's not personal.
You were doing OK, right up to that statement.
Sink r8 is offline  
Old 12-08-2009, 12:51 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: B-777 left
Posts: 1,415
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
You were doing OK, right up to that statement.
Not to worry sinr, I would not use js as a political tool. Just making a point!
syd111 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SoCal Flyer
Technical
28
10-26-2009 09:56 PM
ToiletDuck
Major
4
09-08-2009 02:06 AM
Blackbird
Major
17
06-23-2009 10:17 AM
WatchThis!
Union Talk
71
08-01-2008 08:43 PM
SWAjet
Major
0
03-07-2005 10:48 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices