Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Scab Or Motivated Pilot? >

Scab Or Motivated Pilot?

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Scab Or Motivated Pilot?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-27-2006, 04:33 PM
  #11  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
jetproppilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 61
Default

Originally Posted by skybolt
It is not taboo to work extra. Most all of us, except in the time of furloughs, work extra. Pilots are just a greedy as are Doctors, but a man has to have a life and the airline pilot job can prevent that if management gets its way. If allowed, management would keep a pilot on duty for sixteen hours a day, seven days a week with no days off. If you don't believe that, you should ask some of the guys stuck in 135 jobs; their employers work them to the FAR limits for months at a time. And don't forget, if you ever knew it, the FAR's were built during the time that the FAA had the joint mandate to "PROMOTE and regulate" the aviation industry, meaning that they are not specifically aimed to providing safe travel to the paying passenger. They are also aimed to help the company make a profit, a sitution that doesn't include allowing the pilots to have lives.

The regulations have decreed that a pilot must not fly more than 1000 hours a year, 30 hours in seven days, or 8 hours between required rest periods. The regs also require a 24 hour break every seven days.

Have you attempted to staff an airline? Just for grins, lets do it, OK? First lets say that your airline will fly 100000 hours every 365 days. If you can fly every pilot up to the FAR flight time limits, you will need 100 pilots. Divided equally, you will fly 274 hours per day. 274 hours per day divided by exactly 8 flying hours per day per pilot shows a requirement of 35 pilots per day, BUT you can only work pilots out of 7 days so you have to adjust these numbers to reflect that, then you need to allow one week a year per pilot off for recurrent training, and another four days a year for left seat checkrides and another two days off per year per co-pilots for their checkrides. In short order, you find that you must hire a significantly higher number of pilots than you would think you need according to the simple math. BUT, the simple math, and business related adjustments did not include any adjustments for quality of life for the pilots. If times are good, the manager says OK, we'll actually give you your weekly 24 hour break in your base, or he says we'll give you a few guaranteed days off per month. All of which increase the staffing numbers from the purely mathematical requirement.

All of which brings me to this, a properly staffed airline will appear to a bookkeeper to be fat on pilots. PERIOD. No question about it. So, when times get a little tough, they money people decide that they've got to cut the fat, and their limited view of our world leads them to believe that pilot staffing is in fact, fat. Then they want pilots to fly more, so being generally supportive of our employers, we pitch in to help out. We burn the candle at both ends so to speak. Then the managers say to themselves, hey look at how much money we can save if we reach this production level all of the time. They ask for more and more OT. etc. Jetproppilot, you just can't burn that candle from both ends for perpetuity. We know that, our union knows that and most reasonable people know that; so we attempt to maintain some sort of balance. We don't like the abuse of OT by either company of our fellow pilots, because it leads to poor quality of life for us all.

It is my belief that you would be surprised at the amount of extra flying that happens on a daily basis by the average airline pilot. We are NOT a bunch of featherbedders who demand to be overstaffed so that one of us can be asleep in the break room at all times. We are a group of workers who spend between 16 and 20 days per month away from our families and who don't like it when our fellow pilots enable managements continued perception that we'll take anything. The abuse of OT is just such an action.

Now, don't get me started on the PFT pukes who will PAY to sit in an airliner cockpit.

skybolt
Thank you for your informative post.

This is rhetorical, since "the regs" are etched in stone, but it sounds to me the regs are, well, to regulatory. Do you guys like this regulation? Is it of personal benefit to you or is it stifling?

You can't fly more than thirty hours in seven days? That seems stifling.

Forgive me for the incessant comparison to medicine but, heh, thats the industry I know intimately and I consider flying airliners just as important/significant with just as much, if not more risk involved when things go awry.

Anyway, laws have recently changed (in the last few years) that limits the hours a resident can work. As you know, the term resident refers to a dude/dudette who has graduated from medical school, is now a "doctor" but still doesnt know s hit. Hence residency training during which a physician spends a certain amount of years to learn a trade. The number of years after med school to become whatever-kind-of-doctor depends on what you want to be when you grow up....

pediatrician: 3 years training after med school (i.e. a "three year residency")

general surgeon: 5 year residency

anesthesiologist: 4 year residency

etc etc

SO, to be a general surgeon, you spend 4 years getting a bachelor degree, 4 years getting an MD degree, and 5 years of residency learning how to be a general surgeon.

Anyway, back to my original point.

Residency hours are currently arduous, but tolerable, because of the recent laws limiting residents to eighty hours a week. Prior to these laws there were no limits, and it wasnt uncommon for residents to work 100 hour weeks.

Residency is indoctrination into the medical field, analagous to a regional airline job indoctrinating someone for the majors. The pay sucks....well I guess "sucks" is relative....a first year resident makes between 35-40 k a year with a cuppla grand increase per year of residency.

When residents become "senior residents" i.e. near the end of their training, they have alotta autonomy....a "chief" general surgery resident will do operations by himself. as an anesthesiology resident will, as a pediatric resident will, etc.

These doctors, still technically training for their specific specialty, are taking care of patients....I'm sure you'd agree this is a serious business....

and its been OKed for them to work eighty hours a week.

If you are a heart surgery fellow (a "fellow" is a dude subspecializing...heart surgery is 2 additional years after a general surgery), its OK to do heart surgery eighty hours a week.

So why can an airline pilot fly an airliner only 30 hours a week?
jetproppilot is offline  
Old 06-27-2006, 04:37 PM
  #12  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
jetproppilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 61
Default

IN OTHER WORDS,

30 hours of flying a week, as a set maximum, seems intuitively low.
jetproppilot is offline  
Old 06-27-2006, 04:37 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 973
Default

Originally Posted by jetproppilot
Thank you for your informative post.

and its been OKed for them to work eighty hours a week.

If you are a heart surgery fellow (a "fellow" is a dude subspecializing...heart surgery is 2 additional years after a general surgery), its OK to do heart surgery eighty hours a week.

So why can an airline pilot fly an airliner only 30 hours a week?
Of course the question should be...why is it OK for a heart surgeon to operate after an 80 hour week...oh SH1T I feel a heart pain......Ripper
reddog25 is offline  
Old 06-27-2006, 05:15 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 758
Default

Originally Posted by jetproppilot
IN OTHER WORDS,

30 hours of flying a week, as a set maximum, seems intuitively low.
I could easily fly 60 hours a week if all I did was fly. I usually work a twelve hour duty day just to fly five hours. As it is, I usually spend 250 or so hours away from base/on duty per month. If you subtract the 5 hours of sleep for the numerous reduced rest nights and 8 hours for normal nights, I still spend over forty hours a week doing my job. So while 30 hours of flying might seem intuitively low, forty to fifty hours a week of work doesn't seem so.

The reason the rules exist is simple, an accident happened sometime in the past and the cause was determined to be fatigue. AFTER the fact (as were the vast majority of the FAR's), a reg was written to prevent further loss of life. The old adage is "the FAR's are written in blood". The reason that you are not limited in duty time by the government and I am is that I can kill 198 paying passengers plus myself and five other crew members at a time. You can only kill one. That and the fact that the television news can't make any money by showing a medical mistake. If a doctor leaves a sponge inside a patient, the patient may die days later. That doesn't fit very well into the "if if bleeds, it leads" catagory. If I run out of brains and let a CFIT happen, it leaves a half mile long path of blood, guts, smoke, kerosine fumes and twisted metal for CNN to televise at a profit.
skybolt is offline  
Old 06-27-2006, 05:46 PM
  #15  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
jetproppilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 61
Default

Originally Posted by skybolt
I could easily fly 60 hours a week if all I did was fly. I usually work a twelve hour duty day just to fly five hours. As it is, I usually spend 250 or so hours away from base/on duty per month. If you subtract the 5 hours of sleep for the numerous reduced rest nights and 8 hours for normal nights, I still spend over forty hours a week doing my job. So while 30 hours of flying might seem intuitively low, forty to fifty hours a week of work doesn't seem so.

The reason the rules exist is simple, an accident happened sometime in the past and the cause was determined to be fatigue. AFTER the fact (as were the vast majority of the FAR's), a reg was written to prevent further loss of life. The old adage is "the FAR's are written in blood". The reason that you are not limited in duty time by the government and I am is that I can kill 198 paying passengers plus myself and five other crew members at a time. You can only kill one. That and the fact that the television news can't make any money by showing a medical mistake. If a doctor leaves a sponge inside a patient, the patient may die days later. That doesn't fit very well into the "if if bleeds, it leads" catagory. If I run out of brains and let a CFIT happen, it leaves a half mile long path of blood, guts, smoke, kerosine fumes and twisted metal for CNN to televise at a profit.
I guess whats screwed up is what counts as "flying". In other words, you guys are working hours that arent reimbursed.

Follow me through this and tell me the answer so I can understand.

And allow me to stay in local time for simplicity.

You arrive at MSY at 0800 to pick up your 737 for a 0915 departure (an hour and fifteen minutes seems like a reasonable amount of time for a pilot to check in, get the weather, expected passenger count, fuel burn, etc....by the way...this is an educated guess....I'm making this s hit up as I go in an attempt to understand...so roll with me...)......you depart MSY at 0930.....flight time to TPA about an hour and forty minutes...so you land around 1100....depart TPA at 1130, fly to LIT (hey its my airline I can fly wherever the hell I want)....land at 1330. Depart LIT at 1400, fly to SRQ...land at 1630. By the time you deboard the passengers, secure your plane, grab your stuff, paperwork, blah blah blah, it is 1730.

SO, you've logged 6 hours of flight time, but you've worked from 0800-1730....which is 9.5 hours.

According to the company, how much have you "worked"?

In other words, are your hours from when you arrive at the airport until you leave the airport?

If the answer is yes, it is a fair system, and 30 hours in one week is too low.

If the answer is no, we are only paid from plane-departure-from-gate-to-plane-arrival-to-gate then I understand the concept of the 30-hour-a-week rule.
jetproppilot is offline  
Old 06-27-2006, 05:49 PM
  #16  
On Reserve
 
Mach8Forest's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: Capt/(D/O)
Posts: 15
Default

There is an association of pilots that cannot stand the word SCAB. However, they are what they fear the Most, SCABS!
ASK A MEMBER OF THE APA? My best friend was an AA pilot and stated many times "We Stuffed the RENO guys to the bottom because they were all SCABS that stole AA jobs"
APA then stole the Jobs of TWA pilots in the name of so called unionism!
These pilots are in my opinion worse than a man that walks of the street and crosses a picket line for selfish and maybe personal financial reasons. The APA pilot instead hides behind a weak group of avaitors and crutches to slogans of unionism. The APA used thier Company's Corporate buying power to Exploit the TWA pilots. They did not use pilot Safety record, Geograhphic history, Date of hire, or culture to integrate pilots in a fair and equitable merger. They stole the jobs of an Elite 75 year + pilot group because they could. They are the true SCABS of the Airline industry.
Mach8Forest

Last edited by Mach8Forest; 06-27-2006 at 07:07 PM.
Mach8Forest is offline  
Old 06-27-2006, 06:51 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Roll Inverted and Pull's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Position: Retired 767 Captain
Posts: 548
Default

I did the airline pilot thing for thirty years. I know a little bit about how the pay system works. A pilot`s pay starts when the aircraft is pushed away from the gate, the pay stops when the plane comes to a stop at the gate. All of the other stuff that a pilot may do, such as planning, weather,eating crappy meals at some slop chute on the road, laying over at the old motel 6, whatever, isn`t pay time. It would be like, in the doctor example, when you are actually cutting open a patient, you are working, when the operation stops, the pay stops.
Roll Inverted and Pull is offline  
Old 06-27-2006, 06:53 PM
  #18  
On Reserve
 
Mach8Forest's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: Capt/(D/O)
Posts: 15
Default

Originally Posted by Mach8Forest
There is an association of pilots that cannot stand the word SCAB. However, they are what they fear the Most, SCABS!
ASK A MEMBER OF THE APA? My best friend was an AA pilot and stated many times "We Stuffed the RENO guys to the bottom because they were all SCABS that stole AA jobs"
APA then stole the Jobs of TWA pilots in the name of so called unionism!
These pilots are in my opionion worse than a man that walks of the street and crosses a picket line for selfish and maybe personal financial reasons. The APA pilot instead hides behind a weak group of avaitors and crutches to slogans of unionism. The APA used thier Company's Corporate buying power to Exploit the TWA pilots. They did not use pilot Safety record, Geograhphic history, Date of hire, or culture to integrate pilots in a fair and equitable merger. They stole the jobs of an Elite 75 year + pilot group because they could. They are the true SCABS of the Airline industry.
Mach8Forest
Wow this guy is a little bitter!

Last edited by Mach8Forest; 06-27-2006 at 06:58 PM.
Mach8Forest is offline  
Old 06-27-2006, 07:52 PM
  #19  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
jetproppilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 61
Default

Originally Posted by Roll Inverted and Pull
I did the airline pilot thing for thirty years. I know a little bit about how the pay system works. A pilot`s pay starts when the aircraft is pushed away from the gate, the pay stops when the plane comes to a stop at the gate. All of the other stuff that a pilot may do, such as planning, weather,eating crappy meals at some slop chute on the road, laying over at the old motel 6, whatever, isn`t pay time. It would be like, in the doctor example, when you are actually cutting open a patient, you are working, when the operation stops, the pay stops.
So now the 30 hour a week thing is making more sense.

Sounds like pilots are taking it in the beee hind, though, since it seems if you add up all the pre-flight, layover, post-flight, and delay stuff,


if you were getting paid from arrival-at-airport to leaving-airport,

you'd be getting more justifiable pay.

Uhhhhhhh,

SOMEONE NEEDS TO TELL THE CEOs/FAA THAT PILOTS ARE THE MOST IMPORTANT F UKKING PIECE OF THIS PIE.

Again,

what am I missing here?

Without doctors, there ARE no patients....no patients for the hospitals to provide rooms/lab work/xrays/CAT scans for

Without pilots, there are no passengers to fly around the country.

Of course, patients (medicine)/passengers (airlines) are the most important. And their safety is paramount.

But again, no pilot, no takeoff.

Why this position isn't reveled is making me wanna beat somebody up.
jetproppilot is offline  
Old 06-27-2006, 08:09 PM
  #20  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
jetproppilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 61
Default

Originally Posted by jetproppilot
So now the 30 hour a week thing is making more sense.

Sounds like pilots are taking it in the beee hind, though, since it seems if you add up all the pre-flight, layover, post-flight, and delay stuff,


if you were getting paid from arrival-at-airport to leaving-airport,

you'd be getting more justifiable pay.

Uhhhhhhh,

SOMEONE NEEDS TO TELL THE CEOs/FAA THAT PILOTS ARE THE MOST IMPORTANT F UKKING PIECE OF THIS PIE.

Again,

what am I missing here?

Without doctors, there ARE no patients....no patients for the hospitals to provide rooms/lab work/xrays/CAT scans for

Without pilots, there are no passengers to fly around the country.

Of course, patients (medicine)/passengers (airlines) are the most important. And their safety is paramount.

But again, no pilot, no takeoff.

Why this position isn't reveled is making me wanna beat somebody up.
And ya wanna know whats sad?

Know whats more powerful than pilot opinions/ALPA?

All it takes for you to get recognition is for a Tom Cruise/Angelina Jolie/Harrison Ford to be on a DC-10 emergency landed by Captain Haynes.

Some superficial deity of american life could bring your travesty to the forefront.
jetproppilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mike734
Alaska
42
01-12-2022 12:10 AM
Herc130AV8R
Military
25
03-22-2008 05:22 PM
ranch4x4
Flight Schools and Training
25
01-23-2007 05:37 PM
HSLD
Hiring News
2
11-14-2006 04:32 PM
HSLD
Flight Schools and Training
2
05-14-2006 09:07 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices