Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
I smell a merger brewing with AA/ US Airways >

I smell a merger brewing with AA/ US Airways

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

I smell a merger brewing with AA/ US Airways

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-08-2009, 03:08 PM
  #21  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by AAflyer
Eaglefly,

While I feel I have a fairly solid understanding of our SCOPE clause, I am not sure. I am hesitant to say something and it be incorrect. I posed the question to a few others at AA that can hopefully reference the contract.

What about Eagle?

AA
Boy, that's a tough one.

Depends on what AA wants to keep on the U feed side and whom. They could sell or transfer a part of our ops to say RAH (Wexford ?) and set up a complex whipsaw scenario against any feeder that wants to continue suckling the AMR nipple, including us.

The possibilities are numnerous and the plan could be complex, with Eagle coming out fairly well or gutted. Our CBA (and us) are small potatoes in any wedding like this and it would be the mainline difficulties (or benefits) IMO that would carry the concept.

Of course, I'd have bet my flightkit that AMR would have never bought TWA and I was wrong.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 09-08-2009, 03:09 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
AAflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 652
Default

Originally Posted by texaspilot76
By using the US Airways operating certificate, they are subject to the current labor contract for that certificate, which allows scope to other regional carriers. They can use the RJ's already in use at Airways to fly routes.
I did not realize you had our CBA in hand and know this for fact.. I am trying to find the "language".

AA
AAflyer is offline  
Old 09-08-2009, 03:11 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
AAflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 652
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
Boy, that's a tough one.



Of course, I'd have bet my flightkit that AMR would have never bought TWA and I was wrong.
NO kidding, that is what scares me... I would say this would be a good time for our two groups to get together and brainstorm, or we may be picked off one at a time.

AA
AAflyer is offline  
Old 09-08-2009, 03:12 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2008
Posts: 131
Default

Originally Posted by texaspilot76
I'm not an advocate of US Airways by any means. I'd much rather be working at AMR. However, before making comments regarding the "toxicity" and poor asset of US Airways, keep in mind that they are the only legacy to turn a profit last quarter.
I see what you are saying, there isn't much choice left. If UAL and CO get together, well, guess what Aprey- you're stuck with the ugly chick. I do think the labor situation wouldn't be that hard to deal with by purchasing pieces of the company, perhaps avoiding even taking a single pilot with the transaction. BTW, LCC only had a paper profit, operationally it was a loss last quarter.
Puros is offline  
Old 09-08-2009, 03:15 PM
  #25  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by texaspilot76
By using the US Airways operating certificate, they are subject to the current labor contract for that certificate, which allows scope to other regional carriers. They can use the RJ's already in use at Airways to fly routes.
Maybe or maybe not, but would they WANT to ?

IMO, U has too many players that overcomplicate their feed and many of them aren't pirticularly desirable. Many of them operate 50-seaters as well. I'd bet at least SOME of them would survive and I would think Eagle would to, but might be whipsawed or partially transferred into a much smaller provider.

I'd look for a final solution should this whole possibility occur, that would include 2 or at most 3 feeders, each handling feed at every hub and forced to beg for scraps every 4 years.

AMR acts in its own best interest and yearns for the days of yesteryear (the '90's) where regional carriers were forced to live on their knees to see the next contract.

In order to use U's certificate, wouldn't that have to be the survivng carrier ?

I can't see AMR dumping the AA brand name, no matter how bad they want scope relief.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 09-08-2009, 03:16 PM
  #26  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by AAflyer
NO kidding, that is what scares me... I would say this would be a good time for our two groups to get together and brainstorm, or we may be picked off one at a time.

AA
Our guys have been pitching that for years to the APA with unmentionable results..................I'm not holding my breath there.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 09-08-2009, 03:17 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
texaspilot76's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Right Seat
Posts: 1,458
Default

Originally Posted by AAflyer
I did not realize you had our CBA in hand and know this for fact.. I am trying to find the "language".

AA
Your scope does not cover US Airways' contract. They will use the Airways certificate to operate the flights.
texaspilot76 is offline  
Old 09-08-2009, 03:21 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
texaspilot76's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Right Seat
Posts: 1,458
Default

Originally Posted by Puros
I see what you are saying, there isn't much choice left. If UAL and CO get together, well, guess what Aprey- you're stuck with the ugly chick. I do think the labor situation wouldn't be that hard to deal with by purchasing pieces of the company, perhaps avoiding even taking a single pilot with the transaction. BTW, LCC only had a paper profit, operationally it was a loss last quarter.
Profit is profit, no matter which way you look at it. Anyway that is a whole different subject.
texaspilot76 is offline  
Old 09-08-2009, 03:28 PM
  #29  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by texaspilot76
Your scope does not cover US Airways' contract. They will use the Airways certificate to operate the flights.
So you're hypothisizing that AMR is buying U almost STRICTLY for their feeders ?

Buy U mainline assets and merge that into AA mainline (AA certificate) and sell Eagle to U to operate an independant domestic carrier operating large RJ's on the U certificate (maybe run by Parker) ?

Hmmmmmm............................

I would think most of U mainline would likely disappear over a few years along with most of their uncompatable aircraft and the surviving feeders under U (those with larger RJ's) would merge together (perhaps with Eagle) to expand into a seperate domestic carrier with hundreds of E-190 type aircraft. AA becomes a smaller (then post U merger) International, transcon, long range domestic and "special market" player and U becomes a short/medium and some long range domestic behemoth with wildly profitable 100-seaters ?

In theory, I can see how that would make AMR drool as that way AMR controls both carriers seperately and reaps the rewards for domination and competitivness in both markets, but I'm not sure what the obstacles are ?
eaglefly is offline  
Old 09-08-2009, 03:28 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
AAflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 652
Default

Originally Posted by texaspilot76
Your scope does not cover US Airways' contract. They will use the Airways certificate to operate the flights.
Then it will operated as a separate company. The second one Usairways flight is operated as an AA flight, or under codeshare it falls under our SCOPE clause.

I do not see AMR purchasing Usairways to operate them as a separate company. The whole concept in acquiring and or merging is to grow the companies and expand on the synergies of each carrier. ie Delta and NWA.

Considering the cost and outcome of TWA, I do not see an outright purchase. Asset purchase potentially.

In all this the company will do what it wants and in the end we will grieve what we feel is a breach of our contract.

AA
AAflyer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Frisky Pilot
Regional
20
01-01-2022 05:02 PM
whoareyou310
Piedmont Airlines
59
08-21-2009 05:59 AM
Splanky
Regional
11
09-17-2008 02:52 PM
Sir James
Major
0
03-15-2005 08:35 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
03-07-2005 11:04 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices