Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Rnav/gps/rnp

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-20-2009, 03:56 PM
  #1  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 31
Default Rnav/gps/rnp

What is the consensus among the airline community? Are these in your eyes good, bad, or are you indifferent to them? Should the FAA be getting slammed right now for working too fast to add these?
imatworkallday is offline  
Old 08-20-2009, 04:14 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
2Co2Fur1EXwife's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 314
Default

Originally Posted by imatworkallday
What is the consensus among the airline community? Are these in your eyes good, bad, or are you indifferent to them? Should the FAA be getting slammed right now for working too fast to add these?
Uhhh, we already use them......
2Co2Fur1EXwife is offline  
Old 08-20-2009, 04:18 PM
  #3  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,050
Default

This guy sounds like a possible media troll...

But those systems are already in widespread use, have been for years.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 08-20-2009, 05:03 PM
  #4  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 31
Default

I am NOT a media troll. I am a CFII (and fairly new) and am familiar with the approaches themselves. In fact I think they are a great addition to some of these small podunk airports. I am writing a term paper about the RNAV/GPS/RNP as a response to this article in aviation week FAA Criticized Over RNAV/RNP Strategy | AVIATION WEEK. I am looking for input from the airline pilots themselves. In this article is seems that it is airline management that is complaining about the new procedures. I am trying to get the pilots perspective and any insight about the program.
imatworkallday is offline  
Old 08-20-2009, 05:09 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
goaround2000's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Position: ERJ145 Captain
Posts: 473
Default

Originally Posted by imatworkallday
I am NOT a media troll. I am a CFII (and fairly new) and am familiar with the approaches themselves. In fact I think they are a great addition to some of these small podunk airports. I am writing a term paper about the RNAV/GPS/RNP as a response to this article in aviation week FAA Criticized Over RNAV/RNP Strategy | AVIATION WEEK. I am looking for input from the airline pilots themselves. In this article is seems that it is airline management that is complaining about the new procedures. I am trying to get the pilots perspective and any insight about the program.


BTW...I HATE the news media.
Sorry about the cynicism, but our segment of the industry is currently under media scrutiny...I'm sure you understand.

To answer your question, we already use them at my airline to some degree, and they work just fine. I can certainly see them being adopted eventually in lieu of certain non-precision approaches further down the line as the resources are allocated.
goaround2000 is offline  
Old 08-20-2009, 05:14 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
1Seat 1Engine's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: 737 Right
Posts: 1,385
Default

I'm actually amazed by the number of airline pilots who think they already fly RNP approaches who actually don't know what it is.

My opinion is the FAA isn't moving fast enough on RNP.

BTW, RNAV/LNAV and RNP are not the same thing. Very few airlines use actual RNP approaches. I think Alaska, and WestJet do. Not sure about the others. There's very few RNP approaches approved.
1Seat 1Engine is offline  
Old 08-20-2009, 05:15 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TPROP4ever's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: none ya...
Posts: 1,154
Default

My Airline is currently certifying all pilots at their PC's, so currently we can only shoot the approaches if Both pilots are qualified. I have flown them for years in GA, and they work very well, no complaints so far. We fly the dep procedures at the airline and they work very well.

Last edited by TPROP4ever; 08-20-2009 at 05:29 PM.
TPROP4ever is offline  
Old 08-20-2009, 05:17 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
unemployedagain's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: Non flying, pays better than any front seat, home every night, not missing the crashpad/
Posts: 133
Wink

Originally Posted by imatworkallday
What is the consensus among the airline community? Are these in your eyes good, bad, or are you indifferent to them? Should the FAA be getting slammed right now for working too fast to add these?

You need to read up on the Nextgen program. It is all about Rnav,Gps, and digital data. Some good stuff. They have a lot of work to do. This is to be in place sometime in 2016. The kicker will be for the airlines, there is equipment that has to be purchased for the aircraft and that will cost. Some airlines have signed up, others I wonder if they even know what expense is ahead.
unemployedagain is offline  
Old 08-20-2009, 05:17 PM
  #9  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 31
Default

I understand about the media thing. I think that it is sad that the news media would even consider using the forums to dig up dirt.

That being said. Have you noticed any differences? Shorter flight times? Less fuel? Better routing/handling? Is this article another item that management has decided to add to their "why-we-are-not-making-any-profit" list? Is RNP a problem for the airline too? What I know of RNP is you have to have a GPS and be able to meet certain climb gradients and airspeed requirements. Is this all that RNP consists of or is this 'new CFII all you need to know is...' answer?

I know I am asking a BUNCH of questions, I am just trying to get a better understanding of how the system works.
imatworkallday is offline  
Old 08-20-2009, 05:18 PM
  #10  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 31
Default

Originally Posted by unemployedagain
You need to read up on the Nextgen program. It is all about Rnav,Gps, and digital data. Some good stuff. They have a lot of work to do. This is to be in place sometime in 2016. The kicker will be for the airlines, there is equipment that has to be purchased for the aircraft and that will cost. Some airlines have signed up, others I wonder if they even know what expense is ahead.
I assume this is on the FAA website correct?
imatworkallday is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices