Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Training Contracts?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-03-2009, 12:02 PM
  #1  
On Reserve
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 15
Default Training Contracts?

If anyone knows a little about training contracts, I could use some insight.

The last time I heard about training contracts was about ten years ago. Back then it seemed like most companies didn't go after the pilots, monetarily, who quit early and were liable to pay the company back for "training costs" that were agreed on prior to employment. I heard from a friend a few years ago that World would actually pursue a pilot for training costs stated in their training contract.

There seems to be at least one company that is hiring here in the states, that has a training contract for a duration of one year, prorated monthly.

I've read about a lot of speculation, already, so I'm just checking to see if anyone has any personal experience with this sort of thing.

Thanks.
DustyBottoms is offline  
Old 08-03-2009, 02:06 PM
  #2  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Posts: 48
Default

Originally Posted by DustyBottoms
If anyone knows a little about training contracts, I could use some insight.

The last time I heard about training contracts was about ten years ago. Back then it seemed like most companies didn't go after the pilots, monetarily, who quit early and were liable to pay the company back for "training costs" that were agreed on prior to employment. I heard from a friend a few years ago that World would actually pursue a pilot for training costs stated in their training contract.

There seems to be at least one company that is hiring here in the states, that has a training contract for a duration of one year, prorated monthly.

I've read about a lot of speculation, already, so I'm just checking to see if anyone has any personal experience with this sort of thing.

Thanks.
Training contracts are legal documents. If the company wants to enforce them they can and some will. If you get a good lawyer and have deep pockets then you can see what happens in court some win some don't. The companies that enforce them seem to update the contract after each court case to make them more enforceable. They will have two witnesses and one of them is usually a notary watching you sign it. Most of these companies are selective in who's contract get's enforced and who's does not. The big question is why do they feel they need a contract.
Freedom421 is offline  
Old 08-03-2009, 03:40 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: R U Serious?
Posts: 261
Default

I paid my Mesa contract because it would have cost me more to fight it, which I would have won on a technicality only. Other than that I hear there are others that have training contracts, again some who will go after you, and others that just use it as a scare tactic.
powrful1 is offline  
Old 08-03-2009, 03:54 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MatthewAMEL's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 751
Default

Training contracts are legal documents if...

They are signed, counter-signed and witnessed. If you signed your contract and never saw it again, or were given a copy of it after it was signed by someone else, then it was never properly executed.

In addition, 'legal document' does not mean 'legally enforceable'.

Any decent attorney can get you out of a training agreement (depending on your state) by using several options. For example...in Florida if the training they company gives you is required for your job and they know you don't have it prior to hiring you, then you cannot be required to pay for it.

In several other states, you can use the prohibition against indentured servitude to defeat training agreements.

Now...legal certainly only has a passing acquaintance with moral. If you agreed to pay in exchange for training/job why are you trying to get out of it?
MatthewAMEL is offline  
Old 08-03-2009, 03:54 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
bryris's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2008
Position: Hotel
Posts: 714
Default

Funny that this training is a requirement for the position in the first place, yet some try to stick it to the pilots to hedge against their potential training losses. Regardless of a pilot's background, typed on the company equipment or not, ALL must go through the company training for the job.

I think the chances of any given instance being enforced is slim based on the hear say that I've come across. YMMV.
bryris is offline  
Old 08-03-2009, 04:03 PM
  #6  
Administrator
 
vagabond's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: C-172
Posts: 8,024
Default

Here's an old thread discussing training contracts. I think the lesson we all learned from this was simple - don't sign on to any training contract if you can possibly avoid it.

http://www.airlinepilotforums.com/re...-but-crap.html
vagabond is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Nevets
Regional
80
07-30-2009 07:57 AM
forgot to bid
Major
485
04-03-2009 07:34 PM
RVSM Certified
Flight Schools and Training
23
02-28-2009 08:58 PM
JungleBus
Major
121
12-20-2008 04:13 PM
ChillBillPilot
Major
32
10-09-2008 04:35 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices