Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
SWA looking to buy unnamed domestic carrier >

SWA looking to buy unnamed domestic carrier

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

SWA looking to buy unnamed domestic carrier

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-15-2009, 07:03 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sniper's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,001
Default

Originally Posted by JDFlyer
Not being familiar with the current version of their temporary agreement would this newly acquired company be blended in the seniority list with SWA? Put at the bottom? Or would they just be a separate company whose corporate shares are owned by SWA.
It'd likely be the first option. Obviously, both sides want what's best for their group. An ideal way would be a blended list. Sometimes this goes relatively smoothly (Delta and Northwest). Other times, it doesn't (US Airways and AmericaWest). It essentially boils down to DOH (date of hire) vs. relative seniority in the merger (painting with broad strokes here). If it were say, Alaska that was the partner, you'd likely see 'fences' as well (protecting slots for WN pilots in say, Texas, and Alaska jobs in say, the Pacific Northwest). I don't think SWAPA would even consider a 'staple' (put the other group under all WN pilots), and I doubt the other side would either.

If the new company pilots are put at the bottom of the SWA seniority list, does that mean us poolies will go onto the seniority list BELOW the newly acquired company pilots? (I would assume the answer is yes)
No matter how the respective pilot groups are merged, those pilots without seniority #'s or any history of work with either company as a pilot would be placed below any active pilot (surely), and almost surely below any furloughed pilot too. Being a 'poolie', the best case scenario for you is that your 'poolie' status is still honored @ the end of the merger.
Sniper is offline  
Old 04-15-2009, 07:16 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sniper's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,001
Default

Originally Posted by CHQ Pilot
My guess would be Alaska....

The TA basically spells out the aquisition of a carrier that owns a regional codeshare. The union said the language was built around a specific airline.
I never even thought about sneaking a regional into WN buy buying Alaska and getting Horizon too. Q-400's are great aircraft for some of the shorter routes that WN flies (LGA-BWI would be a great place for a Q-400). How many slots does Alaska have @ slot restricted airports?

If the scope and merger sections of the new WN TA weren't important before, they certainly could be considered important now.

Alaska would be a great companion for WN for all the reasons 'CHQ Pilot' stated. Spirit, while a totally different fleet, might be an option too (lots of international, flies out a a current WN 'focus city'). AirTran, JetBlue . . . I don't think any airline could not be improved by joining up with Southwest, honestly. Who's the lucky one?
Sniper is offline  
Old 04-15-2009, 07:20 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CHQ Pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: FO
Posts: 179
Default

I don't think there can be a staple with the McCaskill-Bond Amendment and the way the scope reads (and this is a very simplified version) that SWA cannot codeshare domestically with a regional carrier, unless it is through aquisition of another airline that owns a regional airline. If that were to happen then all pilots, both the acquired airline and the regional feed would be with SWAPA pilots (taking away a whipsaw type situation). Again very simplified and if it were to actually happen, then it would get extremely complicated with integration issues. Too many variables to even go into at this point. Gives me a headache to try and think about it.
CHQ Pilot is offline  
Old 04-15-2009, 07:27 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: MD88A
Posts: 310
Default

Originally Posted by JDFlyer
If this rumor, and we know how rumors in aviation tend to go, but if this rumor is true AND does actually happen before those of us in the pool actually go into ground school . . . I have just a few questions (that may not have answers yet).

Not being familiar with the current version of their temporary agreement would this newly acquired company be blended in the seniority list with SWA? Put at the bottom? Or would they just be a separate company whose corporate shares are owned by SWA. (Like Skywest, Inc. owns Skywest and ASA but they are run separately, no common seniority list, etc.)
This depends on how the company would structure an acquisition. If the newly acquired company is merged the only those who are on the active pilot list are considered for a new seniority list.

However, if the company is purchased and run as a separate acquired company, separate seniority list are kept and anyone in the respective pool is only part of the separate company.

Time will tell which avenue SWA takes if any at all.


If the new company pilots are put at the bottom of the SWA seniority list, does that mean us poolies will go onto the seniority list BELOW the newly acquired company pilots? (I would assume the answer is yes)

Yes, unless you have a SWA seniority number. normally, anyone in a pool is NOT considered in a merger/acquisition because they are not yet employees.



(Professional responses only please, I am not asking these questions to provoke anyone or start anything negative. Thanks)
see above for the answer
sevenfiveseven is offline  
Old 04-15-2009, 07:44 AM
  #25  
Doesn't Get Weekends Off
 
RockyBoy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,598
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Buying Alaska would be a good way to kick Delta in the nuts, hard. Delta's feed into the Pacific system on the west coast is heavily dependent on Alaska.
If SWA attempts to buys Alaska, you would see Delta launch a bid for them as well because of the plans for the Pacific system from the west coast. I think AF/KLM would be willing to pony up some cash for the bidding war as well. They had a couple billion they were going to put into the merger with NWA, but Delta said they didn't need it. I think DAL/AF/KLM could win in a bidding war against SWA for Alaska. Delta has 4.6B in cash plus the resources of AF/KLM to SWA's 1.4B. Delta would also have less overlap with Alaska than SWA does making it easier to get DOJ approval.

Last edited by RockyBoy; 04-15-2009 at 07:54 AM.
RockyBoy is offline  
Old 04-15-2009, 07:54 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
flaps 9's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2005
Position: 737 F/O
Posts: 500
Default

Originally Posted by SkyHigh
Didn't SWA buy Morris Air with all their MD-80's. I could see them buying a carrier with a different aircraft type and getting rid of them all. In addition, it is Possibly time for SWA to diversify into a second type anyway. If a systemic mechanical problem were to ground the entire 737 fleet SWA would be in big trouble.

Skyhigh
Morris Air flew 737's. You must be thinking of Muse Air which WN purchased in the 80's. They flew the Douglas birds
flaps 9 is offline  
Old 04-15-2009, 07:58 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ClipperJet's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 284
Default

Dudes...take a deep breath. It aint gonna happen.

If it was going to happen, it already would have, and the news would have read, "Southwest announces the purchase of..." You don't announce you're looking to buy something because the price immediately goes up. They'll keep quiet until a deal is done.

Besides "looking to" is very, very vague. I'll bet SWA said something more like, "If we stumbled onto a great deal, we wouldn't dismiss it..."

Finally, right now cash is king. Debt is really, really bad. I doubt SWA is going to use up all their cash or take on huge debt right now.

But I could be wrong....
ClipperJet is offline  
Old 04-15-2009, 08:04 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
tomgoodman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: 767A (Ret)
Posts: 6,248
Default Muse purchase

Originally Posted by flaps 9
Morris Air flew 737's. You must be thinking of Muse Air which WN purchased in the 80's. They flew the Douglas birds
That deal may have been partially due to special factors. As I recall, Lamar Muse was the founder of SWA, and the Board later replaced him with the company's lawyer, Herb Kelleher. Muse then started another airline.
tomgoodman is offline  
Old 04-15-2009, 08:16 AM
  #29  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,038
Default

Originally Posted by RockyBoy
If SWA attempts to buys Alaska, you would see Delta launch a bid for them as well because of the plans for the Pacific system from the west coast. I think AF/KLM would be willing to pony up some cash for the bidding war as well. They had a couple billion they were going to put into the merger with NWA, but Delta said they didn't need it. I think DAL/AF/KLM could win in a bidding war against SWA for Alaska. Delta has 4.6B in cash plus the resources of AF/KLM to SWA's 1.4B. Delta would also have less overlap with Alaska than SWA does making it easier to get DOJ approval.
And that is how greenmail is played.

Look at how AirTran was the unwitting beneficiary of the MidWest fiasco.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 04-15-2009, 08:43 AM
  #30  
Line Holder
 
letsfly's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: New Hire
Posts: 48
Default

Originally Posted by Sniper
Being a 'poolie', the best case scenario for you is that your 'poolie' status is still honored @ the end of the merger.
I agree with Sniper...we need to remember the 2009 outlook letter we poolies received in January:

"Also, we want to remind you that the interview/hiring process is ongoing. While you are currently in a pool for a future class date at Southwest Airlines your pool status is not an offer for employment."

If something like this acquisition happens, hell even if it doesn't happen, I'd be happy to still be in the pool:

"Your pool status is good for 18 months from your interview date, after which time you could be subject to a background update, further flight records request through the PRIA Act, reference check, and possible re-interview."

Good luck to all of us poolies, I can't decide what helps or what hurts our chances of flying 737s for Southwest. What I do know is after August I'll have a lot more time to work on my short game. Yes!
letsfly is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mxaexm
Hangar Talk
146
01-03-2013 01:19 AM
Runner
Hangar Talk
16
06-01-2009 09:34 AM
TPROP4ever
GoJet
322
11-24-2008 08:45 AM
DWN3GRN
Major
81
11-17-2008 01:04 PM
Redwood
Major
73
09-06-2008 06:06 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices