Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
More sad Midwest news... >

More sad Midwest news...

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

More sad Midwest news...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-27-2009, 01:25 PM
  #141  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by Eric Stratton
The regionals may own their airplanes or crew rooms but they don't own the flying. It is contracted to them just like catering is. If they want to get new service when the contract runs out they are free to do so.

You are correct that the time to control this was years ago. When you have people at the mainline who believe regional flying is good because it allows them to have higher pay it's an uphill battle. If you ever talk to someone who doesn't care if they outsource smaller airplanes ask them if they would care if they outsourced the largest. I bet you will get a different response because it will affect them.
Mainline doesn't own its flying either, for if they did we wouldn't be have this discussion now, would we ?

There wouldn't BE any regionals flying outsourced former mainline flying. In the mean time, please drop another quarter into managements slot for a half hour of air.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 04-27-2009, 03:57 PM
  #142  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Eric Stratton's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,002
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
Mainline doesn't own its flying either, for if they did we wouldn't be have this discussion now, would we ?

There wouldn't BE any regionals flying outsourced former mainline flying. In the mean time, please drop another quarter into managements slot for a half hour of air.
Sorry if you don't like the word "own". Maybe "determines" is a better word for you to grasp.
Eric Stratton is offline  
Old 04-27-2009, 05:16 PM
  #143  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by Eric Stratton
Sorry if you don't like the word "own". Maybe "determines" is a better word for you to grasp.
Perhaps we're misunderstanding each other. Airlines (corporations that is) "determines" the flying they do. Pilot groups do not. I doubt any mainline pilot group has "determined" that hundreds of 70 seat jetliners (and now 90 seaters) should be flown by others. At least, not WILLINGLY.

No, OTHERS determined it for them by choosing to NOT contract it to them. You see, when you really look at it, we're ALL flying contracted work. But when one is the first to be contracted that work, there tends to be an assumption of "owned turf" (kinda like a pekinese ****ing on a lamp post).

Please deposit another quarter.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 04-27-2009, 06:20 PM
  #144  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: E-170 Airbender
Posts: 341
Default

Originally Posted by Eric Stratton
Don't you understand? If you are a pilot it's never your fault. It's always someone else's. We like to blame everyone and never ourselves. Kind of like airline managers always having an excuse of why they rarely make money.
ok........
RAHPilot5 is offline  
Old 04-27-2009, 11:05 PM
  #145  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sniper's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,001
Default

Originally Posted by MD80
I agree DAL (United, US Airways...) needs to take it ALL back. Then hirer more pilots with a "B scale" system in place for the aircraft under 100 seats. The regional pilots will be rehired and the whip-sawing will end.
Originally Posted by RAHPilot5
2nd this MD
A B-scale? Yeah, that'll end the whipsaw for sure. With one group of pilots on one payscale and another group on a different one, how will management ever create a fracture in that unified front?

Did we forget American Airlines' Robert Crandall and Don Carty in the late 1980's?

Originally Posted by Hard Landing p. 145
If you already worked for American Airlines, your job and salary were secure; indeed, you would continue getting salary increases. But for every person hired in the future . . . - the story would be different. Each would come in at lower starting wages and in some cases reduced benefits as well. Through the years, as they gained seniority, this second category of workers would receive raises, of course, but they would remain on a lower scale than the older, more established employees, those lucky enough to have been hired by the early 1980's. In fact the new hires would never catch up. They would be perpetually confined to a second-tier status that the unions would come to call the "b-scale".
A group of pilots, "perpetually confined to a second-tier status" - hey, we already have that today - it's called regionals. American and the APA got rid of the 'b-scale', and I doubt any union, least of all ALPA, would ever agree to it again.

PS- What about if mainline took it ALL back, and put all the narrow-body aircraft on a B-scale (you know, that's all the regionals fly anyway, right?)? Or what about if all the widebody drivers take a paycut to sweeten the deal of bringing everyone onto the same list? Are YOU willing to sacrifice some in the name of unity, or just willing to volunteer others for the task? It's a question each of us must ask ourselves if we ever expect things to change.
Sniper is offline  
Old 04-28-2009, 05:17 AM
  #146  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 737 Left
Posts: 828
Default

Originally Posted by RAHPilot5
So it's Republics fault for the decision that were made to relax scope in the past huh? Who do you work for? Just wondering since you like to throw mud. All the best
Not at all.

I'm just saying Republic guys would cross the line for more 175 or GOD FORBID 190's.

I'm furloughed from CAL.
DMEarc is offline  
Old 04-28-2009, 05:38 AM
  #147  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,075
Default

What "line?"
Hetman is offline  
Old 04-28-2009, 06:15 AM
  #148  
Line Holder
 
Invisible Man's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 75
Default

Originally Posted by Eric Stratton
Which airlines were forced to give up flying during a bankruptcy?

The regional pilots have no say in what airplanes they get to fly just like the majors. The majors didn't want them so someone had to fly them.

I think the regional guys wouldn't scream that loudly if it was Delta taking the flying vs. another regional. Better to have mainline take it than have it continuously swapped between regionals.
I think NWA was forced to give up some flying in bankruptcy. Compass?
IM
Invisible Man is offline  
Old 04-28-2009, 06:46 AM
  #149  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,857
Default

Originally Posted by DMEarc
Not at all.

I'm just saying Republic guys would cross the line for more 175 or GOD FORBID 190's.

I'm furloughed from CAL.
Well, I'm glad somebody has made that decision for me! It certainly frees me from having to make the choice.
If another airline strikes and RAH asks us to fly the routes, I'll just hop in the cockpit and say, "It's okay, DMEarc told me to!"
POPA is offline  
Old 04-28-2009, 07:00 AM
  #150  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Eric Stratton's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,002
Default

Originally Posted by Invisible Man
I think NWA was forced to give up some flying in bankruptcy. Compass?
IM
No they weren't forced. They signed a contract while in bankruptcy but were not forced by anyone to give up more 76 seat airplanes.
Eric Stratton is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ToiletDuck
Major
22
03-12-2009 12:01 PM
Learguy
Flexjet
34
02-02-2009 07:12 AM
Hal9000
Regional
111
01-22-2009 08:24 PM
BringDaFunk
In Memory Of
39
01-13-2009 02:28 PM
BoilerUP
Regional
110
09-06-2008 08:11 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices