New Delta scope thread
#1
Can't abide NAI
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,037
New Delta scope thread
To keep from infecting other threads with a decades long scope fight, lets make a new thread.
Everyone crap in their hands and go for a Pitcher's wind up.
If Joe Merchant shows up, everyone will know where to aim
Everyone crap in their hands and go for a Pitcher's wind up.
If Joe Merchant shows up, everyone will know where to aim
Last edited by Bucking Bar; 02-25-2009 at 02:27 PM.
#2
While talk is cheap, it is a beginning. But, eventually after there is nothing left to say or plan, there must be action.
I think what will get managements attention is if we elect "new" leaders. And by "new" I mean somewhat more radical. You know, like how George Washington and John Adams were....
New K Now
#4
Bucking, i sent the resolution package to my reps for them to read over along with my take on things, Again. I also sent it to everyone i know for them to get educated and educate others. Spread the word. keep up the good work.
#5
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Ok, let me start. Historically, we have sucked. But, that does not mean that we should continue to suck. We need to elect leaders who refuse to go about things differently with a different mindset.
I think what will get managements attention is if we elect "new" leaders. And by "new" I mean somewhat more radical. You know, like how George Washington and John Adams were....
New K Now
I think what will get managements attention is if we elect "new" leaders. And by "new" I mean somewhat more radical. You know, like how George Washington and John Adams were....
New K Now
UAL? Nope. They've now got a court order hanging over them.
APA? Nope. How many are still on furlough since 2001?
AAA? Nope. They've got a busted union, double bankruptcy payrates, and no hope in sight.
How about the not so radicals? The ones that conduct business.
CAL? Gone through the least pain of the majors post 2001.
SWAPA? Industry leading rates and a new contract (even though they're shrinking next year).
DAL/NWA? Payraises to merge, equity distribution, signficant retirement enhancements, all while losing money.
I think I'd stick with the businessmen.
#6
Help me out here. Can you show me a single example in recent memory of "radical leadership" at a company losing money producing positive results?
DAL/NWA? Payraises to merge, equity distribution, signficant retirement enhancements, all while losing money.
I think I'd stick with the businessmen.
DAL/NWA? Payraises to merge, equity distribution, signficant retirement enhancements, all while losing money.
I think I'd stick with the businessmen.
But hey - the last Delta pilot will be very well paid as he watches that Mesaba 787 depart for Tokyo.
I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice!
And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.
Barry Goldwater
Last edited by Check Essential; 02-25-2009 at 03:45 PM.
#7
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
I guess you've never been the recipient of a PID petition, nor had your union "brothers" refuse to sign a mutual support resolution (non union Skywest pilots did, however), or oppose the hiring of furloughed ALPA pilots unless they resigned their seniority.
Did all those guys "get it?"
Now a few on here want to make the problem worse by adding Compass to the NWA/DAL list. Sailingfun went through the litany of problems with that idea, so it's not necessary to rehash in detail, but answer his primary concern: What prevents whipsawing new mainline Delta pilots (former CPZ) against lower cost regional 76 feeder carriers?
For extra credit you can answer what happens to the flowdown expense/protection when those guys are added to our list, how it impacts the Ford-Cooksey settlement restrictions, and what the legal rights of the other wholly owned carriers would be. Then we can get warmed up with the consequences of your proposed "solution."
Scope is important. CPZ to mainline isn't the answer. It's a feelgood emotional response to scope.
#8
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Maybe you can point to an example in the US Airline industry of great scope that worked for a network carrier.
AAA? Two bankruptcies later it doesn't appear that it did.
UAL? At least the BAE 146's are gone.
NWA? Again, at least the BAE 146's are gone. They did bring a larger percentage of large RJ's versus fleet size to the new operation with Compass.
AMR? How are those nearly 2000 furloughed guys doing? But they've got scope...
CAL? Probably the most effective clause out there so far.
I lived the dream with Delta Express. All aircraft that size were on a single payscale, but it was substantially below the per seat cost of the next largest mainline airframe. We had to buy the payraise for the airplane out of our total contract, and within three years they were all gone.
lather, rinse, repeat...
#9
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Posts: 354
I think integrating Compass could be a good thing if it is paired with change in the scope language. All future 51+ seat (or 71+ if you'd prefer) flying is flown by Delta pilots on the Delta seniority list. As contracts expire they are flown by Delta pilots.
Delta already has 153 DC-9-10 equivalent "RJ"s flying for them. That could mean an eventual 1500 more Delta pilots.
Delta already has 153 DC-9-10 equivalent "RJ"s flying for them. That could mean an eventual 1500 more Delta pilots.
Last edited by mynameisjim; 02-25-2009 at 04:02 PM. Reason: addition
#10
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
DALPA then changed or loosened scope in 2001 and four other times since then.
Removing the cap on 50 seat jets, raising the block hr cap on DCI from 27-32% to 42% now to 62% of all DAL flying (There is no cap now), Allowing 70 seat jet, allowing 76 seat jets, raising the amount of 76 seat jets allowed, and finally allowing the increased gross weight on the CPZ jets.
Removing the cap on 50 seat jets, raising the block hr cap on DCI from 27-32% to 42% now to 62% of all DAL flying (There is no cap now), Allowing 70 seat jet, allowing 76 seat jets, raising the amount of 76 seat jets allowed, and finally allowing the increased gross weight on the CPZ jets.
That merger is what increased your job security and gave you personally increased furlough protection.
Where did these pilots on DCI's list come from? Well the paragraph above illustrates it. They are flying routes that were flown by mainline. That is an outsourcing of 4000 jobs. If we were able to hold this line on scope I would be looking at upgrade instead of 10 year at a min in the right seat.
Whether you think of me as management or not, it is immaterial. I am here to add to the constructive dialogue on APC. It is a point of view. Anything that is of an NDA nature is left off the boards. I am a champion of our company. It is a great place to work, but it is ok to recognize that the walls might need repainting, or the chairs in the crew lounge need a re do. Point is that I and many other colleagues on here want to improve the quality of the career. I bet that you fell the same way. I am not willing to accept status quo. You should not either. I apologize if somewhere that got lost in the translation.
And I do feel the same way regarding improving the quality of the career. The last word is yours, as I fly early tomorrow.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post