Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-20-2009, 12:19 PM
  #12941  
Gets Weekends Off
 
brakechatter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2009
Posts: 404
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
I've commuted enough in my life and I currently do not need to nor want to commute until I retire BUT I know full well I could be commuting at any time so I always support better commuter policies. People who, at any airline mind you, say "live in your base" annoy me and I do live in base. So I as an ATL live in base guy will support better commuter policies.
Another in base guy here who supports commuting issues.
brakechatter is offline  
Old 08-20-2009, 12:28 PM
  #12942  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,619
Default

Originally Posted by NuGuy
Heyas RVR,

With the current MOU 7 debacle, I seriously doubt we're going to see any unity any time soon.

After hearing what I heard today, this issue has elevated north/south relations to "crisis". If left to stand as is, there will be a rift that will take years, if not decades to heal.

Nu
I am sorry, but the DAL-N guys tend to be just a little bit melodramatic. Every issue that comes up is a "crisis". Every dispute is a life or death decision. It's like dealing with teen age girls.

We are talking about which DAL-N guys get to bid which DAL-N seats. You make it sound like some huge crisis when in fact it is mostly an old Red Book-Green Book issue.
alfaromeo is offline  
Old 08-20-2009, 12:32 PM
  #12943  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by CVG767A
Okay, I just looked at MOU 7 on the DALPA site. It looks like it provides for a transition from the NWA way of filling vacancies to the DAL way. Am I understanding that correctly?

Crisis? Rift? Years to heal? C'mon, that sounds a little melodramatic.
I agree. It's definitely PI$$ING in some guys Cheerios, buts it's far from a Crisis.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 08-20-2009, 12:41 PM
  #12944  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NWA320pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 737 Capt
Posts: 1,166
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
I agree. It's definitely PI$$ING in some guys Cheerios, buts it's far from a Crisis.
Guess that depends on who you speak too......
NWA320pilot is offline  
Old 08-20-2009, 12:48 PM
  #12945  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by NWA320pilot
Guess that depends on who you speak too......
A Crisis? Really? I can understand if people are upset, but a crisis? Seems a little Drama Queenish.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 08-20-2009, 12:55 PM
  #12946  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NWA320pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 737 Capt
Posts: 1,166
Default

Go and read the ALPA web boards and see what guys say that are in the top 10% of the company, have been held out of WB aircraft and now the rules are changing and they are again held out..... Can you say lawsuit.
NWA320pilot is offline  
Old 08-20-2009, 01:09 PM
  #12947  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Default

Originally Posted by NWA320pilot
Go and read the ALPA web boards and see what guys say that are in the top 10% of the company, have been held out of WB aircraft and now the rules are changing and they are again held out..... Can you say lawsuit.
Sure I can. Just like Tanksley, et. al. Anybody can sue. To win you generally have to have a case.

The tempest in a teapot brewing over there is over the perceived change in rolling of the cards for the APA process. A bunch of folks think that it is somehow related to the Anchorage base closure. It isn't. It's about PRIP.

As far as filling of vacancies, how many vacancies does a 15% systemwide reduction in block hours create? How many vacancies does a base closure create? How many vacancies does parking the entire fleet of 747-200's create? How many vacancies does parking 4 of 16 747-400 create?

Easy answer. Each creates displacements. No advancements. Those guys "held out" don't have vacancies to bid into. The results using the APA process would have been the same with or without MOU-7. The results of the PRIP would have been far different. Only 2 of 26 747-400 Captains that took the PRIP are leaving before December. Absent MOU-7 and their ability to hit their milestones, how many of the remaining 24 would have opted to stay?

The MEC directed that each pre-merger group benefit from its own PRIPS. It directed that each pilot be allowed to hit milestones. That's what MOU-7 does.

Some crisis. The misrepresentation to heat this teapot is ridiculous.
slowplay is offline  
Old 08-20-2009, 01:13 PM
  #12948  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,619
Default

Originally Posted by NWA320pilot
Go and read the ALPA web boards and see what guys say that are in the top 10% of the company, have been held out of WB aircraft and now the rules are changing and they are again held out..... Can you say lawsuit.
Before they talk about lawsuits, they may want to read the contract they signed last June. Section 22.
alfaromeo is offline  
Old 08-20-2009, 01:15 PM
  #12949  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
Sure I can. Just like Tanksley, et. al. Anybody can sue. To win you generally have to have a case.

The tempest in a teapot brewing over there is over the perceived change in rolling of the cards for the APA process. A bunch of folks think that it is somehow related to the Anchorage base closure. It isn't. It's about PRIP.

As far as filling of vacancies, how many vacancies does a 15% systemwide reduction in block hours create? How many vacancies does a base closure create? How many vacancies does parking the entire fleet of 747-200's create? How many vacancies does parking 4 of 16 747-400 create?

Easy answer. Each creates displacements. No advancements. Those guys "held out" don't have vacancies to bid into. The results using the APA process would have been the same with or without MOU-7. The results of the PRIP would have been far different. Only 2 of 26 747-400 Captains that took the PRIP are leaving before December. Absent MOU-7 and their ability to hit their milestones, how many of the remaining 24 would have opted to stay?

The MEC directed that each pre-merger group benefit from its own PRIPS. It directed that each pilot be allowed to hit milestones. That's what MOU-7 does.

Some crisis. The misrepresentation to heat this teapot is ridiculous.
Well thought out and logical explaination... however laced with your typical condescending tone and contempt of people that question the way things are done.

...And you wonder why people so veraciously question what is done by the union...

Last edited by 80ktsClamp; 08-20-2009 at 01:26 PM.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 08-20-2009, 01:24 PM
  #12950  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,716
Default

Lets change 85-90% of the way you do things, change how you control your life (PBS),how you get to work-or not, your sick leave, your insurance, your vacation, moving 800-1200 pages in Jepps, getting new books....and change how you get paid, you may be a tad upset.
iceman49 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices