Latest on Midwest Airlines
#11
They put the 25 B717s up for sale, only a couple of airlines showed any interest. Mexicana needed to replace their aging Fokker-100 fleet, I think they agreed to take the B717s.
Sad what happened to Midwest, flew them a couple of times, best service, nicest F/As. truly a shame
Sad what happened to Midwest, flew them a couple of times, best service, nicest F/As. truly a shame
#12
I rather hope Republic gets it. If memory serves correctly, this is what Independence tried to do and got the royal shaft. If Republic got the 717, they could no longer fly for DAL, that would be a great way to downsize a significant number of RJs in the system.
The airline graveyard is littered with companies that leave their core product and try and become something they're not.
The airline graveyard is littered with companies that leave their core product and try and become something they're not.
#13
I rather hope Republic gets it. If memory serves correctly, this is what Independence tried to do and got the royal shaft. If Republic got the 717, they could no longer fly for DAL, that would be a great way to downsize a significant number of RJs in the system.
The airline graveyard is littered with companies that leave their core product and try and become something they're not.
The airline graveyard is littered with companies that leave their core product and try and become something they're not.
#14
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: Bebe Bus De L'Air Assistant Aerial Conveyance Facilitator
Posts: 351
I rather hope Republic gets it. If memory serves correctly, this is what Independence tried to do and got the royal shaft. If Republic got the 717, they could no longer fly for DAL, that would be a great way to downsize a significant number of RJs in the system.
The airline graveyard is littered with companies that leave their core product and try and become something they're not.
The airline graveyard is littered with companies that leave their core product and try and become something they're not.
They got around that by starting Republic Airways and creating Republic Airways Holdings (RAH), which then "owned" Chautauqua and Republic (they have since add Shuttle America). Chautauqua continued to do all 50-seat and less flying under their certificate while Republic and SA did all the 50+ flying under their certificates. In essence, RAH operates three separate airlines, although their pilots can bid across certificates.
The point is that it got around the AA scope issue because Chautauqua does not operate anything above 50 seats. I'm not familiar enough about our scope clause to know if they can do a similar runaround, especially if they add another certificate (Midwest) to their portfolio.
As much as I hate what RAH is doing to our profession, I have to give them kudos for being pretty savvy when it comes to stuff like this.
#15
I rather hope Republic gets it. If memory serves correctly, this is what Independence tried to do and got the royal shaft. If Republic got the 717, they could no longer fly for DAL, that would be a great way to downsize a significant number of RJs in the system.
The airline graveyard is littered with companies that leave their core product and try and become something they're not.
The airline graveyard is littered with companies that leave their core product and try and become something they're not.
Airtran and Hawaiian showed no interest in those B717s, either a foreign airline takes them, or its straight to the desert.
#16
I don't know about that. Republic Holdings, nee Chautauqua, has a good track record for getting around scope. They did this with AA, which has a restriction that an AA regional can't fly anything larger than 50 seats, even if it's in another airline's colors (Eagle being the exception with their CRJ700s).
They got around that by starting Republic Airways and creating Republic Airways Holdings (RAH), which then "owned" Chautauqua and Republic (they have since add Shuttle America). Chautauqua continued to do all 50-seat and less flying under their certificate while Republic and SA did all the 50+ flying under their certificates. In essence, RAH operates three separate airlines, although their pilots can bid across certificates.
The point is that it got around the AA scope issue because Chautauqua does not operate anything above 50 seats. I'm not familiar enough about our scope clause to know if they can do a similar runaround, especially if they add another certificate (Midwest) to their portfolio.
As much as I hate what RAH is doing to our profession, I have to give them kudos for being pretty savvy when it comes to stuff like this.
They got around that by starting Republic Airways and creating Republic Airways Holdings (RAH), which then "owned" Chautauqua and Republic (they have since add Shuttle America). Chautauqua continued to do all 50-seat and less flying under their certificate while Republic and SA did all the 50+ flying under their certificates. In essence, RAH operates three separate airlines, although their pilots can bid across certificates.
The point is that it got around the AA scope issue because Chautauqua does not operate anything above 50 seats. I'm not familiar enough about our scope clause to know if they can do a similar runaround, especially if they add another certificate (Midwest) to their portfolio.
As much as I hate what RAH is doing to our profession, I have to give them kudos for being pretty savvy when it comes to stuff like this.
They had to get a new certificate to operate those aircraft around scope, but because it was seen as a direct threat to DAL mainline flying we dropped them. Again, I don't remember the exact specifics so I'm talking from a shady memory. But I do recall that we dropped them over this as they were now competing against mainline not flying for them. If Republic does the same thing in MKE with Midwest, don't you think DAL may have some serious heartburn with this. They are already trying to find a way to get rid of significant numbers of 50 seaters and this could accomplish that.
The reason no one challenged them with AA is that AA was supportive of their lift and wanted them for the regional feed. The game changes when you go head to head with the hand that feeds you.
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 119
It's been a few years so I truly forget the specifics but as I recall, ACA was doing our DO-Jet flying. When they fought UAL during the bankruptcy I believe they saw an opening at Dulles. With the LCCs being all the rage and no one could do anything wrong, ACA management made their fatal error and thought that as a low cost regional unit they could take the same infrastructure, get some Airbus aircraft and compete like JBLU.
They had to get a new certificate to operate those aircraft around scope, but because it was seen as a direct threat to DAL mainline flying we dropped them. Again, I don't remember the exact specifics so I'm talking from a shady memory. But I do recall that we dropped them over this as they were now competing against mainline not flying for them. If Republic does the same thing in MKE with Midwest, don't you think DAL may have some serious heartburn with this. They are already trying to find a way to get rid of significant numbers of 50 seaters and this could accomplish that.
The reason no one challenged them with AA is that AA was supportive of their lift and wanted them for the regional feed. The game changes when you go head to head with the hand that feeds you.
They had to get a new certificate to operate those aircraft around scope, but because it was seen as a direct threat to DAL mainline flying we dropped them. Again, I don't remember the exact specifics so I'm talking from a shady memory. But I do recall that we dropped them over this as they were now competing against mainline not flying for them. If Republic does the same thing in MKE with Midwest, don't you think DAL may have some serious heartburn with this. They are already trying to find a way to get rid of significant numbers of 50 seaters and this could accomplish that.
The reason no one challenged them with AA is that AA was supportive of their lift and wanted them for the regional feed. The game changes when you go head to head with the hand that feeds you.
Also, RAH was challenged by AA (actually, I believe APA brought the legal action), and was forced to acquire a new certificate to operate the >50 seat aircraft separate from CHQ, who does the AA 145 flying.
#18
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: Bebe Bus De L'Air Assistant Aerial Conveyance Facilitator
Posts: 351
It's been a few years so I truly forget the specifics but as I recall, ACA was doing our DO-Jet flying. When they fought UAL during the bankruptcy I believe they saw an opening at Dulles. With the LCCs being all the rage and no one could do anything wrong, ACA management made their fatal error and thought that as a low cost regional unit they could take the same infrastructure, get some Airbus aircraft and compete like JBLU.
They had to get a new certificate to operate those aircraft around scope, but because it was seen as a direct threat to DAL mainline flying we dropped them. Again, I don't remember the exact specifics so I'm talking from a shady memory. But I do recall that we dropped them over this as they were now competing against mainline not flying for them. If Republic does the same thing in MKE with Midwest, don't you think DAL may have some serious heartburn with this. They are already trying to find a way to get rid of significant numbers of 50 seaters and this could accomplish that.
The reason no one challenged them with AA is that AA was supportive of their lift and wanted them for the regional feed. The game changes when you go head to head with the hand that feeds you.
They had to get a new certificate to operate those aircraft around scope, but because it was seen as a direct threat to DAL mainline flying we dropped them. Again, I don't remember the exact specifics so I'm talking from a shady memory. But I do recall that we dropped them over this as they were now competing against mainline not flying for them. If Republic does the same thing in MKE with Midwest, don't you think DAL may have some serious heartburn with this. They are already trying to find a way to get rid of significant numbers of 50 seaters and this could accomplish that.
The reason no one challenged them with AA is that AA was supportive of their lift and wanted them for the regional feed. The game changes when you go head to head with the hand that feeds you.
Again, RAH could possibly start up Midwest without triggering the scope clause. Whether that will trigger a similar ACA-type response from DL remains to be seen. It all depends on the details of the agreements we have with RAH. There may not be anything in there that would allow us to end the contract without encurring significant penalties. Look at the trouble we're having trying to get rid of Freedom. Knowing RAH's track record, they probably have a pretty ironclad deal that prevents DL from just ending the contract.
#19
Perhaps that's why there is such the holdup on the 90+ seat pay at RAH???? This time it would matter since a 90+ seat plane is actually on the verge of reality and the company has planned a certain pay below what is being asked for to make all this work...
#20
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: e190
Posts: 929
The difference is ACA or ExpressJet was trying go it alone on a new brand. RAH would have the infrastructure in place to use the MidEx brand, and I doubt they would keep the 9 717s around. It would be an Embraer product, presumably 190/195s. Not saying its guaranteed success, but they would be acquiring a well established airline that has been marginally successful in the past in spite of all the efforts of Hokesema et al to hinder it. Also, DAL might even love to have RAH operating 170/190s as Midwest...bring them on as a codeshare and have a pseudo-regional that easily gets around DAL scope with their DCI partners.
Also, RAH was challenged by AA (actually, I believe APA brought the legal action), and was forced to acquire a new certificate to operate the >50 seat aircraft separate from CHQ, who does the AA 145 flying.
Also, RAH was challenged by AA (actually, I believe APA brought the legal action), and was forced to acquire a new certificate to operate the >50 seat aircraft separate from CHQ, who does the AA 145 flying.
I work at xjt and even though branded failed a lot of our guys had a lot of pride in what we were doing and it gave a lot of people a glimmer of hope through a difficult time. It was definitly a cool experience but as far as operationally it is going to suck. Management will be pre-ocuppied with the new flying, all monetary resources will be going towards it, and there wil be hiccups in the operation.... its a PIA
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post