Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Delta Payscale For Crj900? >

Delta Payscale For Crj900?

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Delta Payscale For Crj900?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-03-2009, 04:14 PM
  #291  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Fly4hire's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Left, left, left right left....
Posts: 911
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
The conversation was friendly until it was mentioned that I don't deserve to be stapled because the airplane I fly doesn't have adaquet overhead bin space. In fact NuGuy wanted the 76 CRJ operators shut down and the E-Jet guys given mainline seniority. I took offense to that.
I don't think that was the point. I think you should have a staple proportional to the seats brought to the mainline. If DAL does not want CRJ900's - no seats - if they do include them I'm all for the number of seats they represent, which would not include Saabs seats. It's up to DAL Inc if they decide to bring any of these acft to the mainline, and then for DALPA to sort out the SL.
Fly4hire is offline  
Old 02-03-2009, 04:20 PM
  #292  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Avroman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: FIRE ALPA
Posts: 3,097
Default

Originally Posted by satchip
DAL, I think this statement is how we got in this mess in the first place. If DCI had a jet with 76 seats and the range to go coast to coast, don't you think that they would use it on that route? The new RJs will do just that. Scope should be any ticket sold as a Delta ticket should be flown by a Delta pilot on a Delta jet. I am afraid that genie is out of the bottle so we should limit leg segment. Any leg over 1 hour or 150 miles should be mainline.

ACL pointed out that flying belongs to mainline. He's right as long as it has a Delta code. If Skywest/Mesaba/Mesa/et al want flying, let them fly under thier own brand and their own routes. We must recapture our brand because it is being destroyed by DCI. Before all the regional guys get thier dander up, honestly answer this question. If two companies fly the same route at the same time, one in a CRJ and one in a MD/73/320, which one will people choose?

Bringing Compass onto our list and under our certificate is the first step to recapturing our brand.
Simple, whichever ticket is cheaper. Very few people have any clue other than when and how much, and since you just ruled out when that leaves how much. Granted some of the regular business travelers would pay a FEW $ more to go on the larger planes the typical Trailerpark Timmy won't care about anything but cost.
Avroman is offline  
Old 02-03-2009, 04:28 PM
  #293  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

Originally Posted by Fly4hire
I don't think that was the point. I think you should have a staple proportional to the seats brought to the mainline. If DAL does not want CRJ900's - no seats - if they do include them I'm all for the number of seats they represent, which would not include Saabs seats. It's up to DAL Inc if they decide to bring any of these acft to the mainline, and then for DALPA to sort out the SL.
No, my point is, it's either all or nothing. If you staple compass to the list, Delta buys more RJ's and gets rid of larger airplanes. The career has not improved, it has gone farther south.

Last edited by Mesabah; 02-03-2009 at 04:34 PM.
Mesabah is offline  
Old 02-03-2009, 04:53 PM
  #294  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

There will be 255 76 seat jets either way. Better have them at mainline.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 02-03-2009, 05:01 PM
  #295  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
There will be 255 76 seat jets either way. Better have them at mainline.
The ones at mainline don't count. 255 is the max number of outsourced flying. By moving the E-jets to mainline it allows them to replace them with 900's which delta is borderline over the limit. You are adding more mainline jets which is a good thing, however, it is not a scope recapture as is being said.
Mesabah is offline  
Old 02-03-2009, 05:07 PM
  #296  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Like I said, this loop hole needs to be closed too.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 02-03-2009, 05:18 PM
  #297  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DAL4EVER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: 88B - Loud Pipes Save Lives
Posts: 1,597
Default

Originally Posted by satchip
DAL, I think this statement is how we got in this mess in the first place. If DCI had a jet with 76 seats and the range to go coast to coast, don't you think that they would use it on that route? The new RJs will do just that. Scope should be any ticket sold as a Delta ticket should be flown by a Delta pilot on a Delta jet. I am afraid that genie is out of the bottle so we should limit leg segment. Any leg over 1 hour or 150 miles should be mainline.

ACL pointed out that flying belongs to mainline. He's right as long as it has a Delta code. If Skywest/Mesaba/Mesa/et al want flying, let them fly under thier own brand and their own routes. We must recapture our brand because it is being destroyed by DCI. Before all the regional guys get thier dander up, honestly answer this question. If two companies fly the same route at the same time, one in a CRJ and one in a MD/73/320, which one will people choose?

Bringing Compass onto our list and under our certificate is the first step to recapturing our brand.
I agree with you. My Scope comment was meant to relate to more to the old 33 seat or less Saabs and Brasilias. Higher than that and two 50 seat a/c can replace a DC9, two 70 seaters replace an MD88 and so on.

I disagree that they would go with a 70 seater coast to coast. The cost per seat mile would be to prohibitive. Not to say that wouldn't be a threat however. I do agree that the fight needs to begin somewhere and I feel the battle should begin with Compass. We can fight subsequent battles but if we aren't victorious with Compass, the subsequent battles will be a moot point.
DAL4EVER is offline  
Old 02-03-2009, 05:23 PM
  #298  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by Xray678
yes, the contract. Read it, then call ALPA and ask them questions. I asked this very question of one of the ATL LEC reps. The company can add three 76 seat RJs for every one mainline plane that is added. If the number of mainline aircraft subsequently decreases, the company does not have to get rid of any 76 seat RJs, they just can't add any more until they are above the old number of mainline aircraft.

This is one of the reasons I voted no when we first got this scope and I voted no again to the JCBA.
There is a limit on large RJs. They cannot add RJs, and then remove mainline planes without removing RJs. We didn't just give them the green light to order all the RJs they want. We are also parking planes which will adjust the fleet size.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 02-03-2009, 05:28 PM
  #299  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,037
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
The ones at mainline don't count. 255 is the max number of outsourced flying. By moving the E-jets to mainline it allows them to replace them with 900's which delta is borderline over the limit. You are adding more mainline jets which is a good thing, however, it is not a scope recapture as is being said.
Hence the reason why my proposed resolution is to analyze and evaluate, then act.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 02-03-2009, 05:33 PM
  #300  
Underboob King
 
Superpilot92's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: Guppy Commander
Posts: 4,412
Default

Originally Posted by Xray678
yes, there is. I am talking about the number of 76 seaters the company can add.

I think the total number of 70 and 76 seat Rjs the company can operate is now capped at 255. With the right number of mainline aircraft all 255 could be 76 seat jets.
The way I read it there is a cap on 76 seaters as well. Don't have the number in front of me but isn't the 255 total for 70 and 76 seats with a max of 120 76 seaters? That cap has't been reached yet.
Superpilot92 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rotorhead
Major
0
01-27-2009 06:50 AM
dragon
Major
60
12-06-2008 04:43 PM
vagabond
Major
46
09-02-2008 01:07 PM
JetFlyer06
Regional
34
09-01-2008 11:26 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 09:14 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices