Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Delta Payscale For Crj900? >

Delta Payscale For Crj900?

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Delta Payscale For Crj900?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-02-2009, 04:18 PM
  #141  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,037
Default

Compass has a larger, heavier, type that is a family of aircraft up to 122 seats that is a direct DC9 replacement.

Mesaba doesn't have a unlimited flow up / down, or representation within the Delta MEC. Mesaba does not have a training agreement.

There is also some history there. Probably best to get the story from the Mesaba MEC.

Last edited by Bucking Bar; 02-02-2009 at 04:30 PM.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 02-02-2009, 04:20 PM
  #142  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Fly4hire's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Left, left, left right left....
Posts: 911
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
What does compass have?
E175's. DAL *may* want to do 195/175 mix at some point. So because you have a modified flow, and possibly an aircraft DAL does not want, all of XJ should be stapled together with CPZ?

As I stated it has to with what you bring. Say hypothetically (it all is) that they want the CRJ900, what do you do with the pilots flying the Saab? This is about getting 76 seat plus flying at the mainline for mainline pilots, not about getting feeder pilots jobs at DAL.

If you come with a 76 seat plus aircraft, the more the merrier. If you don't you have no claim to a DAL seat in my book.
Fly4hire is offline  
Old 02-02-2009, 04:27 PM
  #143  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Compass has a larger, heavier, type that is a family of aircraft up to 130 seats that is a direct DC9 replacement. Mesaba doesn't have a unlimited flow up / down, or representation within the Delta MEC. Mesaba does not have a training agreement.

Mesaba does have a type that is part of a family going down to 40 seats, in operation at Comair.

It is also what Compass doesn't have. I have not read nearly as much about Compass pilots in the news.
No, the E 195 is max 106 seats in a twin cabin config. The E 175 carries only a few extra hundred pounds of payload over the crj900. The E175 is almost a foot wider, which is a big difference, i'll give you that. The CRJ 1000 competes directly with the E190.
Mesabah is offline  
Old 02-02-2009, 04:32 PM
  #144  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

Originally Posted by Fly4hire
E175's. DAL *may* want to do 195/175 mix at some point. So because you have a modified flow, and possibly an aircraft DAL does not want, all of XJ should be stapled together with CPZ?

As I stated it has to with what you bring. Say hypothetically (it all is) that they want the CRJ900, what do you do with the pilots flying the Saab? This is about getting 76 seat plus flying at the mainline for mainline pilots, not about getting feeder pilots jobs at DAL.

If you come with a 76 seat plus aircraft, the more the merrier. If you don't you have no claim to a DAL seat in my book.
I'm a CRJ 900 captain. I don't understand the argument. Are you saying 50 seat scope should not be at the mainline? Shouldn't all flying be at the mainline?

For every Compass airplane that goes to the mainline, delta can buy three more 76 seat jets to operate at another DCI carrier. You either take all the 76 seat scope or you don't take any scope.
Mesabah is offline  
Old 02-02-2009, 04:34 PM
  #145  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,037
Default

Mesabah,

Refer to Fly4Hire's post. In addition, Mesaba burned a few bridges. It makes more sense to merge Comair and Mesaba and spin the whole lot off to SkyWest. SKYW takes pride in operating the largest fleet of the type and saving a bunch of money due to economies of scale.

... and you did not address the other issues that build a bridge to Compass. Mesaba did not want Delta pilots flowing down. They only want something that benefits them.

Last edited by Bucking Bar; 02-02-2009 at 04:43 PM.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 02-02-2009, 04:39 PM
  #146  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,037
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
For every Compass airplane that goes to the mainline, delta can buy three more 76 seat jets to operate at another DCI carrier.

You either take all the 76 seat scope or you don't take any scope.
You are dictating scope terms?

The number of permitted aircraft above 70 seats will not change. For one thing, Delta can always just buy an E195 and put it on mainline. Nobody says the airplanes change Certificates even if the pilots do.

Also, you have a lot of mainline jets coming out of the fleet.

Last edited by Bucking Bar; 02-02-2009 at 04:53 PM.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 02-02-2009, 04:41 PM
  #147  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Fly4hire's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Left, left, left right left....
Posts: 911
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
I'm a CRJ 900 captain. I don't understand the argument. Are you saying 50 seat scope should not be at the mainline? Shouldn't all flying be at the mainline?

For every Compass airplane that goes to the mainline, delta can buy three more 76 seat jets to operate at another DCI carrier. You either take all the 76 seat scope or you don't take any scope.
That remains to be seen if a 76 seater would count against the 3:1 just because it's at the mainline. If it did this could all just be a ruse to expand outsourcing in which case it will go nowhere.

I don't think there is any will to go after 50 seat flying right now - then you have to deal with every DCI carrier. Limited 76 seat flying may be attainable - we have to start somewhere. CPZ and the E175/195 is the place to start.

You say there should be no difference in what 76 seat acft we bring on - but you still have not addressed the fact the DAL Inc. may not want CRJ900's.

Should DALPA risk the ability to get this done to make it inclusive for everyone?
Fly4hire is offline  
Old 02-02-2009, 04:45 PM
  #148  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,037
Default

Eventually returning all flying to mainline is a great goal. Right now we aren't even sure DALPA even wants Compass. On the D ALPA board the Captains were against the idea.

Last edited by Bucking Bar; 02-02-2009 at 04:52 PM.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 02-02-2009, 05:31 PM
  #149  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tinpusher007's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 330 B
Posts: 1,623
Default

Originally Posted by Fly4hire
You say there should be no difference in what 76 seat acft we bring on - but you still have not addressed the fact the DAL Inc. may not want CRJ900's.
It appears that DALPA doesn't want the 900's but the opposite seems true of DAL. Say what you will about the 900 but it burns less fuel than an E175. If DAL was so interested in the 175 then why didn't they strictly order them for their 76-seat lift needs?
Tinpusher007 is offline  
Old 02-02-2009, 05:34 PM
  #150  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tinpusher007's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 330 B
Posts: 1,623
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Mesabah,

Refer to Fly4Hire's post. In addition, Mesaba burned a few bridges. It makes more sense to merge Comair and Mesaba and spin the whole lot off to SkyWest. SKYW takes pride in operating the largest fleet of the type and saving a bunch of money due to economies of scale.
I think thats easier said than done. DL obviously couldn't offload Comair to Skywest, how do you suppose they would be able to do it by combining us and Comair?
Tinpusher007 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rotorhead
Major
0
01-27-2009 06:50 AM
dragon
Major
60
12-06-2008 04:43 PM
vagabond
Major
46
09-02-2008 01:07 PM
JetFlyer06
Regional
34
09-01-2008 11:26 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 09:14 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices