Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
ATA airlines attempting to start charging to jumpseat? >

ATA airlines attempting to start charging to jumpseat?

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

ATA airlines attempting to start charging to jumpseat?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-26-2009, 03:17 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
7576FO's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: 737 CA MIA
Posts: 1,042
Default

You do know I was joking about ATA?
7576FO is offline  
Old 01-26-2009, 04:26 PM
  #12  
Snakes & Nape
 
Phantom Flyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: B-767 Captain
Posts: 775
Question Sorry...I Missed Something.

Originally Posted by ArcticDog
"I just flew in on AA XXXX from XXX to XXX. The Captain pulled myself and three (other airline) pilots aside and informed us that their Union just got word from their management that AA, along with all the airlines that belong to the ATA, have decided to push through a $25.00 jumpseat fee for all jumpseaters, no matter if you are in a jumpseat or seat in the back.
Lets see you commute to work 5 times a month that adds up to $250.00 a month. When I asked the Captain what he had heard from the his Union he stated that they were trying to fight it but need to get everybody and their Unions on board to fight this. If my figures are correct then this would add up to nearly $3000.00 a year."
In the subject line, ArticDog says "ATA airlines attempting to start charging for jumseats." I thought ATA was out of business. I must have missed something. Then you mention an American flight that apparently the Captain mentioned charging for a J/S.

I don't think that will flush with most carriers. First of all, American pilots would be left out in the cold with little jumpseat options of their own and secondly, it opens up Pandora's Box from some legal issues. In a previous life, we were told, in no uncertain terms, that if a Captain ever even accepted the equivalent of a "pass fee" from a jumpseater, he would be terminated ! Period.

I think this Captain was either pulling your chain or delusional...or both.

BTW, ArticDog, your math is correct and you get a 100%.

G'Day Mates
Phantom Flyer is offline  
Old 01-26-2009, 04:30 PM
  #13  
Rubber dogsh#t out of HKG
 
Radials Rule's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: Senior Seat Cushion Tester Extraordinaire
Posts: 625
Default

Originally Posted by Phantom Flyer
In the subject line, ArticDog says "ATA airlines attempting to start charging for jumseats." I thought ATA was out of business. I must have missed something. Then you mention an American flight that apparently the Captain mentioned charging for a J/S.
I believe what the OP meant by ATA airlines is the member airlines of the industry group, the Air Transport Association.
Radials Rule is offline  
Old 01-26-2009, 05:09 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
ArcticDog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: On the aluminum Arctic snow sled
Posts: 127
Default

Okay folks. I'm sorry I didn't realize my question was going to come under such attack.

First, yes, I was referring to the Air Transport Association. This is the "trade organization" the airlines belong too. This was metioned in my quote. Maybe I should have worded the titile to the thread better. Sorry.

Second, I am only quoting a reliable source from my own airlines union board. I do believe the quoted exchange did in fact take place, however it is quite possible the AA pilot didn't have his facts straight or the quoted pilot misunderstood. Thus, why I posted this here to see if any pilots out had heard this or this was just bad information.

Third, what right do you have to have my post removed! If there was some truth to this at all don't you think we would want to be informed so we could take a stand and stop it? I am getting displaced soon and will be commuting and just like the next guy I don't want to be charged for using the jumpseat.

I'm not trying to rip on AA pilots, APA, ALPA, jumpseaters, captains, fo's, math teachers or anyone else! For god sakes, I just heard something and I thought I could come here to see if some of my professional peers had heard anything of this. Not to get my head ripped off.

Mods, if you think I am way off base, by all means remove the thread and we can be done with all this!
ArcticDog is offline  
Old 01-26-2009, 05:13 PM
  #15  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,047
Default

Sounds like you had good reason to come ask the question, I would have too.

Hopefully no one else has heard the same thing...anyone who thinks the ATA has not contemplated or discussed something like this is probably in fantasy-land. Hopefully they would decide it would not be worth the backlash.

I would personally attempt to organize a commuters-stay-home protest...for the month of Dec 2009.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 01-26-2009, 07:51 PM
  #16  
Need More Callouts
 
757Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Unbridled Enthusiasm
Posts: 2,143
Default

Originally Posted by ArcticDog
Second, I am only quoting a reliable source from my own airlines union board. I do believe the quoted exchange did in fact take place, however it is quite possible the AA pilot didn't have his facts straight or the quoted pilot misunderstood.
Heard the same thing from one of CAL's Jumpseat committee guys so its got some legs. AA management suggested it and supposedly the Union hasn't blinked yet. Don't shoot the messenger but this is coming from some fairly reliable sources.
757Driver is offline  
Old 01-26-2009, 08:03 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Green Banana's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 162
Default

Originally Posted by 7576FO
I'm 104% positive ATA went out of business in March 2008
That made the whole post worth it. I spit my beer out with that one Everything else is BAL BAL BLA!
Green Banana is offline  
Old 01-27-2009, 03:25 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
7576FO's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: 737 CA MIA
Posts: 1,042
Default

Thanks GB,
There is some discussion on our APA message board about this. Sort of sounds like another "something AA wants" What else is new?

While I do not commute or jumpseat often, i'd have to seriously add "over my dead body" to this happening.
7576FO
7576FO is offline  
Old 01-27-2009, 04:12 AM
  #19  
Feeling blessed.
 
HalinTexas's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2005
Position: Was I finally in the right place at the right time?
Posts: 540
Default

Actually it was April 3, but the joke taken.......well, sorta well.
HalinTexas is offline  
Old 01-27-2009, 04:12 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,599
Default

A few years back AirTran charged 25 dollars to jumpseat if you could not ride in the cockpit. It would be up to individual airlines to decide if they want to charge or not. I have heard rumors of charges. Most of this is coming about with the inclusion of flight attendants in jumpseat agreements. The number of jumpseaters carried has soared. ATA really has nothing to do with it. In most cases if a airline decideds to charge it would put them in violation of their recipricol jumpseat agreements and they would be terminated. Airlines are looking for every source of revenue so you never know what management will try and do.
sailingfun is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PicF16
Major
55
08-29-2018 06:29 PM
USMC3197
Major
9
02-07-2010 02:05 AM
HuronIP
Major
57
11-20-2008 09:18 AM
vagabond
Major
15
10-12-2008 12:07 PM
DLax85
Cargo
3
08-30-2008 07:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices