More Great News for you SWA poolies!
#52
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: 777 Cap
Posts: 199
Riddle me this Kevin, Why did it not make financial sense for SWA to furlough after 9-11 when all the other carriers did. Answer: It was a huge financial burden to not only keep us all on the payroll but also to pay us as if we were flying even when they shutdown the airspace. We are currently carrying 250-300 extra pilots right now. If SWA did not care about them, they would be on the street. OOps, I guess that shoots down your theory. Sorry you are so bitter and cynical. If I had $5 for every pilot that told me I was crazy for wanting to go to SWA, I'd be rich ... oh ya, I forgot that I am. I planned accordingly and still own my retirement funds and have not taken a pay cut. Sorry things did not work out for you, perhaps you should have planned accordingly. So do I still "crack you up"?
Don't drink the cyanide!
Don't drink the cyanide!
That's why they didn't have to furlough.
#54
If you have read the Company's earnings release today you clearly saw where our CEO announced zero planned growth for 2009 and 2010. That news is a significant setback for our pilot group. The Company will take delivery of 9 new aircraft in 2009 and as of this writing will retire older classic aircraft to end the year with 535 aircraft, down from 537 in 2008. Additionally, 2010 and 2011 delivery schedules have been modified with 2010 now down to 10 aircraft delivery. Unfortunately, the Company is planning 10 retirements in 2010.
Welcome to the new southwestern airways, Herb is gone, and GK is in full control
Welcome to the new southwestern airways, Herb is gone, and GK is in full control
#55
#56
Line Holder
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Posts: 82
Facts please. Or is this just conjecture on your part? I'm sure the junior FO's would love to hear what you know.
SWA is one of the only airlines around that hasn't declared bankruptcy or taken a taxpayer bailout. Yes, hard times are here for everyone....but if SWA is hurting, what about everybody else??
I'm playing the odds that SWA will still be standing when everything is said and done. Pretty sure the rest of the guys in the pool and the junior FO's feel the same way.
SWA is one of the only airlines around that hasn't declared bankruptcy or taken a taxpayer bailout. Yes, hard times are here for everyone....but if SWA is hurting, what about everybody else??
I'm playing the odds that SWA will still be standing when everything is said and done. Pretty sure the rest of the guys in the pool and the junior FO's feel the same way.
Article in the Fort Worth Stat Telegram business section about SWA, Gary Kelly is quoted saying, "the airline will shrink by 4% by the end of 2009." If you google I'm sure you can find it. The whole article is posted on the SWAPA forum.
#57
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 74
Experience, or speculation?
A 4% shrink translates into about 20 to 24 airplanes less. That's about 200 to 250 pilots. I think a furlough is coming at SWA, your're right it's not Herb's airline anymore, Mr. Kelly has turned into American Airlines. Going to be a a few new Captains going back to the FO seat from the way it looks.
Ha, ha, ha... you guys crack me up!
If I had $5 for every pilot who told me in 1991 I'd never be furloughed from Delta I'd be rich!
Your company doesn't care about you, you're only an hourly wage-earner. If it makes financial sense for them to furlough, they will.
Don't drink the Kool-Aide!
Plan accordingly...
Kevin
If I had $5 for every pilot who told me in 1991 I'd never be furloughed from Delta I'd be rich!
Your company doesn't care about you, you're only an hourly wage-earner. If it makes financial sense for them to furlough, they will.
Don't drink the Kool-Aide!
Plan accordingly...
Kevin
Oh, and to play by my own rules...
In the pool.
#58
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 128
You're entitled to your opinion, certainly, but I'd venture to guess you don't have any experience with, and you don't actually work for Southwest. There are about 35,000 employees there who have a culture, which includes things like "We won't furlough," and it's got a fair bit of inertia to it. So I'm not sure GK privately disregards this idea, but even if he did, I'm not sure the other 35,000 would actually lay down and let it happen. It could happen, anything could happen, but if you think GK and SWA are indistinguishable from any and every other airline in their mentality, well again, you have your opinion. Choose accordingly.
I don't even have to ask.
Oh, and to play by my own rules...
In the pool.
I don't even have to ask.
Oh, and to play by my own rules...
In the pool.
#59
A little update from our union pres:
SWAPA has indeed asked the Company to hire pilots several times in our history because the Company had in every instance grossly undermanned the operation resulting in significant quality of life issues for our pilot group including extremely high JA and on line reroutes. If you've been her any time at all, you know exactly what I'm talking about. The most recent request for the Company to hire pilots came from SWAPA about one year ago and it was in response to excessive JA and reroutes among our pilot group. There was concurrently very high reserve utilization which contributed to the JA problem. Flight Operations agreed and scheduled several classes to alleviate the shortage. Unfortunately it took several months for those classes to come on line due to growth we were experiencing and the resultant hiring for those additional aircraft.
As we were moving close to optimal staffing in the summer of 2008, senior management made a decision to cut capacity by approximately 4.5% beginning in December 2008 with the bulk of the reduction occurring in early January this year. Unfortunately nobody in senior management told Flight Operations, specifically Capt. Chuck Magill, so the hiring continued. That hiring continued until the news of the schedule reduction became public. You will recall that that Capt. Magill found out about the reduction the same way all of us did and that was an article in the Dallas paper. As soon as the capacity was confirmed, SWAPA requested that the Company immediately cease all hiring to mitigate the effect on our pilots in 1Q09. Capt. Magill agreed and suspended hiring. But the problem for 1Q09 was already set. We are estimated to be around 250+ pilots extra right now. With a given pool of flying, the excess of pilots right now has driven trip totals well below normal even for February. The good news is that trip totals should move towards normal levels beginning in March and continue through at least the summer. Beginning in September, Flight Operations is set to begin phase two of the RNP transition training which will require several hundred of our group to be in training each week. This will keep trip totals near the normal range through completion of RNP training sometime in 2Q10.
So what's the solution to over manning situations such as this one? One word...communication. If senior management had brought Flight Operations into the capacity reduction discussion at all, the over manning situation could have been greatly reduced if not completely mitigated. That's the quick history of "SWAPA asking the Company to hire" pilots. But that is old news now and we've got the extra pilots (I'm glad every one of you are here!). All of us feel the pinch in our wallets because of the lack of communication in the headquarters. Please don't misunderstand me; I fully support the Company reducing grossly unprofitable flights in January. In fact, I was shocked at the amount of money we were losing on these flights and why it took so long to cut them. My beef is with poor inter-departmental communication creating a hardship on our group (and our Flight Attendants). The problem didn't have to occur. The follow on questions and rumors about furlough because of the overstaffing are just that, rumors. I have heard nothing from management about any talk of furloughs and don't expect to. So when/if you hear talk about it, please dismiss it out of hand.
SWAPA has indeed asked the Company to hire pilots several times in our history because the Company had in every instance grossly undermanned the operation resulting in significant quality of life issues for our pilot group including extremely high JA and on line reroutes. If you've been her any time at all, you know exactly what I'm talking about. The most recent request for the Company to hire pilots came from SWAPA about one year ago and it was in response to excessive JA and reroutes among our pilot group. There was concurrently very high reserve utilization which contributed to the JA problem. Flight Operations agreed and scheduled several classes to alleviate the shortage. Unfortunately it took several months for those classes to come on line due to growth we were experiencing and the resultant hiring for those additional aircraft.
As we were moving close to optimal staffing in the summer of 2008, senior management made a decision to cut capacity by approximately 4.5% beginning in December 2008 with the bulk of the reduction occurring in early January this year. Unfortunately nobody in senior management told Flight Operations, specifically Capt. Chuck Magill, so the hiring continued. That hiring continued until the news of the schedule reduction became public. You will recall that that Capt. Magill found out about the reduction the same way all of us did and that was an article in the Dallas paper. As soon as the capacity was confirmed, SWAPA requested that the Company immediately cease all hiring to mitigate the effect on our pilots in 1Q09. Capt. Magill agreed and suspended hiring. But the problem for 1Q09 was already set. We are estimated to be around 250+ pilots extra right now. With a given pool of flying, the excess of pilots right now has driven trip totals well below normal even for February. The good news is that trip totals should move towards normal levels beginning in March and continue through at least the summer. Beginning in September, Flight Operations is set to begin phase two of the RNP transition training which will require several hundred of our group to be in training each week. This will keep trip totals near the normal range through completion of RNP training sometime in 2Q10.
So what's the solution to over manning situations such as this one? One word...communication. If senior management had brought Flight Operations into the capacity reduction discussion at all, the over manning situation could have been greatly reduced if not completely mitigated. That's the quick history of "SWAPA asking the Company to hire" pilots. But that is old news now and we've got the extra pilots (I'm glad every one of you are here!). All of us feel the pinch in our wallets because of the lack of communication in the headquarters. Please don't misunderstand me; I fully support the Company reducing grossly unprofitable flights in January. In fact, I was shocked at the amount of money we were losing on these flights and why it took so long to cut them. My beef is with poor inter-departmental communication creating a hardship on our group (and our Flight Attendants). The problem didn't have to occur. The follow on questions and rumors about furlough because of the overstaffing are just that, rumors. I have heard nothing from management about any talk of furloughs and don't expect to. So when/if you hear talk about it, please dismiss it out of hand.
#60
You mention that you haven't taken a pay cut. All of the line totals are down for Dec, Jan and Feb with very little discretionary flying available to make up the difference. That is a pay cut.
And before I'm labeled as a malcontent or told "if you're not happy leave" - let me be clear; I'm very happy at SWA and don't want to work anywhere else. But I feel a little truthful perspective was in order.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post