SWA CAT III Question
#32
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: A320
Posts: 321
#33
Clutch,
There's nothing I've ever seen that restricts Cat-3b to autoland only(company opspecs might but not FAR or ICAO type rules). It allows use of a DH (less than 50') which implies see to land operations (like in some of the CDG approaches). How you get to that DH in order to see something (w/ approval from on high) seems to be irrelevant (although, if I was riding on that aircraft, it would be HIGHLY relevant to me!!).
Last edited by Adlerdriver; 12-28-2008 at 01:11 PM.
#34
#35
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: SLC ERB
Posts: 467
When I tell people at my new airline that this little regional has been flying hand flown Cat III approaches in a turboprop since the mid '90's, they don't believe me!
SW, DL, AS, and QX all use various models of the Flight Dynamics HGS system. All Cat III certified HGS's have flare guidance that will take you right down to touchdown on the runway. Though you are required to see the runway to go below the 50' DH, its still a very precise system. At QX we used to fly HGS approaches to 0/0 in the sim. After landing we would bring the vis back up only to find the plane right on centerline. Definately helps build confidence.
The Fed's really like the HGS system. They allowed QX to use 1800 RVR at many 2400 RVR runways, Cat II as low as 1000 RVR, and single engine Cat III. Autoland is a great system, but is expensive and systems intensive.
#36
As an FO at QX, I got to do CATIII approaches in the sim during training from the left seat. That was by far the easiest approach to fly. As Dash8widget said, it could be a 600RVR morning in Seattle and still a legal takeoff alternate.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post