Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

SWA CAT III Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-27-2008, 03:19 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Jack Bauer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,357
Default

Originally Posted by KLM pilot
Hi cgtpilot, I'm confused. I take it jb means jet blue, which flies airbus and E190. Both airplanes (I thought) are cat III certified anyways. What's the advantage of HUD v. the inherent capacity of the airplane. I thought a HUD is a customer prefered option. Why get it if the a/c is already capable of cat III?

Thanks
The reason given to me at Delta is to give another option with low vis for Cat III if the A/P or Autoland is OTS.
Jack Bauer is offline  
Old 12-27-2008, 03:28 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: Some Hotel
Posts: 1,617
Default

Another question for the SW folks. What is the max tailwind on landing for the 737. I was surprised to see a WN 737 land in PHL the other day on Runway 35 (about 5400 feet) with a 10kt. tailwind.
CRJDriver is offline  
Old 12-27-2008, 04:48 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: A320
Posts: 321
Default

Originally Posted by KLM pilot
Hi cgtpilot, I'm confused. I take it jb means jet blue, which flies airbus and E190. Both airplanes (I thought) are cat III certified anyways. What's the advantage of HUD v. the inherent capacity of the airplane. I thought a HUD is a customer prefered option. Why get it if the a/c is already capable of cat III?

Thanks
Yes JetBlue. You are correct that both airplanes are cat III airframes. However (speaking of the E190 only), for the airplane to be cat III the company has to buy the 2nd autopilot which we did not. We did however buy dual HUDs which can substitute for the 2nd AP allowing cat IIIb ops. Hence the hand-flown cat III approaches (it won't arm unless the AP is off by 500 RA). Apparently the bean counters went for the HUDs instead of 2 APs. The HUDs also allow us to do RVR 3/3/3 Low Vis T/Os. The HUDs give us a graphical depiction of the runway centerline (deviation indicator) to make it safe Not sure what the autothrottles pay in the picture...we do have the autothrottles as well.
cgtpilot is offline  
Old 12-27-2008, 06:32 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 456
Default

SWA has been CAT III for several years.
It has been more than several years. SWA started doing CAT III in 1995, the paperwork process was something that Morris started that SWA was smart enough to follow through on.

Another question for the SW folks. What is the max tailwind on landing for the 737.
The max tailwind is 10 knots, unless the braking action is poor. Then it drops to 5 knots.
tanker is offline  
Old 12-27-2008, 06:40 PM
  #15  
Line Holder
 
GoGators85's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 34
Default

Originally Posted by remlap
Let me ask a quick question of the SWA folks. Is SWA now doing CAT III approaches? We went into JAX the other night and it was CAT III. SWA followed us in. I was surprised, I understood that SWA was CAT I.

Thanks
Last night... God what a mess that was. That must have been before the approach lights went out. That little mishap turned a 50 min flight into a 4hr ordeal. Big thanks to the airtran crew who got me home.
GoGators85 is offline  
Old 12-27-2008, 07:03 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Adlerdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 767 Captain
Posts: 3,989
Default

So what are the mins for a Cat-3 hand flown w/ HUD?
I would assume it's got to be "see to land" in some form rather than what's allowable with a Cat-3 autoland.

It would be interesting to see what the cost difference is between HUD/hand-flown ops and maintaining A/Ps to cat-3 standards.
Adlerdriver is offline  
Old 12-27-2008, 07:12 PM
  #17  
*********
 
paxhauler85's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,068
Default

Originally Posted by Adlerdriver
So what are the mins for a Cat-3 hand flown w/ HUD?
I would assume it's got to be "see to land" in some form rather than what's allowable with a Cat-3 autoland.

It would be interesting to see what the cost difference is between HUD/hand-flown ops and maintaining A/Ps to cat-3 standards.
Hand flown mins are 50 feet, if I remember correctly.
paxhauler85 is offline  
Old 12-27-2008, 07:18 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Dash8Pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Dreamniner
Posts: 352
Default

I don't know about Southwest, but Horizon's Dash 8's were RVR 600/600/600 with a 50 ft DH. I think they mentioned in training that the Q400 and CRJ-700s were 600/600/400, though I never flew them so I'm not positive on that.
Dash8Pilot is offline  
Old 12-27-2008, 11:12 PM
  #19  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: B747 FO
Posts: 45
Default

Thanks, it's clear.
KLM pilot is offline  
Old 12-28-2008, 07:23 AM
  #20  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Posts: 82
Default

Originally Posted by James Bond
Cat III are hand flown? Why?
You did not know? Southwest Airlines has the best pilots in the world. If you don't believe me just ask SWAPA. LOL!!
River6 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
eprn1n2
Aviation Law
3
12-22-2008 06:36 PM
DWN3GRN
Major
81
11-17-2008 01:04 PM
Redwood
Major
73
09-06-2008 06:06 AM
USN C9B
Major
10
08-26-2008 01:36 PM
30 From Bottom
Cargo
23
08-24-2008 11:45 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices