Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Delta losing Delta Shuttle to RJ's >

Delta losing Delta Shuttle to RJ's

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Delta losing Delta Shuttle to RJ's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-09-2008, 05:33 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,918
Default

Originally Posted by buzzpat
I think our business travelers would beg to differ...
Obviously sarcasm is hard to read here...
aa73 is offline  
Old 12-09-2008, 06:01 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 564
Default

To me the bigger question is, are they parking the MD88's or are they moving them elsewhere in the system? If they are moving them then it is not such a big deal!
buffalopilot is offline  
Old 12-09-2008, 07:02 AM
  #23  
Underboob King
 
Superpilot92's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: Guppy Commander
Posts: 4,412
Default

Originally Posted by buffalopilot
To me the bigger question is, are they parking the MD88's or are they moving them elsewhere in the system? If they are moving them then it is not such a big deal!
Thats what i am wondering also.
Superpilot92 is offline  
Old 12-09-2008, 07:27 AM
  #24  
Weekend and Holiday Pilot
 
Doug Masters's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Sippin' at the Troubadour
Posts: 1,142
Default

Originally Posted by buffalopilot
To me the bigger question is, are they parking the MD88's or are they moving them elsewhere in the system? If they are moving them then it is not such a big deal!
I flew with a check airmen in July (yea, they all claim to be "in the know"), but this is exacty what he said would happen. I'll paraphrase: "The loads on the shuttle are around 35%. The MD-88 is too big for that route and in order to keep hourly service, DAL needs a smaller jet. The shuttle -88s will return to the mainlin fleet to replace RJs on routes with more demand and /or routes losing RJ frequency but being replaced by mainline jets."

So it appears those -88s will rotate back into the mainline fleet. Lets hope that holds true.
Doug Masters is offline  
Old 12-09-2008, 08:53 AM
  #25  
Need More Callouts
 
757Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Unbridled Enthusiasm
Posts: 2,143
Default

Originally Posted by JungleBus
Yes, I believe all 70+ flying should stay at mainline. It's an issue a whole lot bigger than what happens to me or any other regional pilot flying them. I'd take my chances applying to fly it at the major...

Why not cap it at 50 like we did?

For once, I can say that we have something vastly superior to Delta in our contract.

Mind you, its probably the only thing that is better.
757Driver is offline  
Old 12-09-2008, 08:55 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
KC10 FATboy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Legacy FO
Posts: 4,105
Default

DAL and DALPA signed a LOA increasing the block hours on the MD-88 FOs in NYC. This was the result of losing part of the Shuttle flying. We now have increased 3 and 4 day trips. For the Jan bid, our ALV is 82:00. We are quite busy here.

So to answer all of the questions, so far, the flying has been picked up with "see America" trips.

-Fatty
KC10 FATboy is offline  
Old 12-09-2008, 08:56 AM
  #27  
Underboob King
 
Superpilot92's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: Guppy Commander
Posts: 4,412
Default

Originally Posted by Doug Masters
I flew with a check airmen in July (yea, they all claim to be "in the know"), but this is exacty what he said would happen. I'll paraphrase: "The loads on the shuttle are around 35%. The MD-88 is too big for that route and in order to keep hourly service, DAL needs a smaller jet. The shuttle -88s will return to the mainlin fleet to replace RJs on routes with more demand and /or routes losing RJ frequency but being replaced by mainline jets."

So it appears those -88s will rotate back into the mainline fleet. Lets hope that holds true.
Today in the investors webcast they talked alot about up gauging aircraft in specific markets and that the DC9s were now a very helpful tool in the puzzle. "yesterdays trash is todays treasure" was the exact quote. Context of the discussion was in regards to higher fuel and now low fuel. fwiw

I think we will see alot of md80s and dc9s put on old rj routes. This will allow them to move the same amount of seats with less frequency.
Superpilot92 is offline  
Old 12-09-2008, 09:08 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tinpusher007's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 330 B
Posts: 1,629
Default

Originally Posted by 757Driver
Why not cap it at 50 like we did?

For once, I can say that we have something vastly superior to Delta in our contract.

Mind you, its probably the only thing that is better.
Here's the question though...I'd be willing to bet CAL needs an aircraft smaller than the 73G and certainly bigger than the E145 (and other than the Q400). Kudos to you guys for holding scope at 50 seat jets. But is it likely that they will approach you guys to fly larger RJ's at mainline?
Tinpusher007 is offline  
Old 12-09-2008, 11:42 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Permanently scarred
Posts: 1,707
Default

Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy
DAL and DALPA signed a LOA increasing the block hours on the MD-88 FOs in NYC. This was the result of losing part of the Shuttle flying. We now have increased 3 and 4 day trips. For the Jan bid, our ALV is 82:00. We are quite busy here.

So to answer all of the questions, so far, the flying has been picked up with "see America" trips.

-Fatty
Jan's bid package already reflects the reduction of DCA shuttle trips. By my count the number of trips that checked in at LGA and had landings in DCA for Dec was 107; for Jan it's down to 58. Yet, as Fatty points out the ALV for and F/O there is 82 for Jan. Hopefully this is a good indicator that parking aircraft is not planned. On a negative note, the loads could be better--just did a LGA-TPA leg and only had 60 on board. Haven't done one of these lately so maybe it's not indicative of that flight.
GunshipGuy is offline  
Old 12-09-2008, 11:55 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
KC10 FATboy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Legacy FO
Posts: 4,105
Default

I have noticed that our mainline loads weren't booked full as they were during the previous months -- especially the last flights of the night.

The Shuttle Trips are hit or miss. But more than likely, they are very undersold.

-Fatty
KC10 FATboy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dragon
Major
60
12-06-2008 04:43 PM
vagabond
Major
46
09-02-2008 01:07 PM
JetFlyer06
Regional
34
09-01-2008 11:26 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 09:14 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices