Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
WSJ - Another 6mth Delay To 787 >

WSJ - Another 6mth Delay To 787

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

WSJ - Another 6mth Delay To 787

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-04-2008, 09:31 PM
  #1  
On Reserve
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 16
Default WSJ - Another 6mth Delay To 787

Full WSJ story in this link here:

Boeing Jet Faces Delays in the Wake of Walkout - WSJ.com

A program update is also due soon. (link)

In a recent interview, Virgin Atlantic Airways Chief Executive Steve Ridgeway voiced customers' growing frustration. "We're pretty fed up," he said. "We've got no clarity from Boeing."

Virgin was originally due to receive its first Dreamliner in 2011, but "we don't know how long the delay is now," Mr. Ridgeway said. He referred to the Dreamliner as "the world's rarest airplane."
FBEDCOM is offline  
Old 12-05-2008, 03:02 AM
  #2  
Weekend and Holiday Pilot
 
Doug Masters's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Sippin' at the Troubadour
Posts: 1,142
Default

Geez...I had plastic airplanes as a kid in the 70s. They can't be that hard to make.
Doug Masters is offline  
Old 12-05-2008, 04:31 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
alvrb211's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,045
Default

Originally Posted by Doug Masters
Geez...I had plastic airplanes as a kid in the 70s. They can't be that hard to make.
Boeing and Airbus have both stated publicly that the market is big enough for both manufacturers. Yet, both mismanage their programs and make promises they cant keep.
The 787 was marketed as the aircraft that would burn 20% less fuel. Neither the Rolls Royce nor the GE engines will provide that. This is very slippery marketing indeed and may present more problems ahead.

AL
alvrb211 is offline  
Old 12-05-2008, 04:48 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ottopilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,576
Default

I just heard that the 787 is heavier than planned, which means more fuel burn and less range. They are still trying to get back to planned weights. First few planes might be heavier than planned.
Ottopilot is offline  
Old 12-05-2008, 05:43 AM
  #5  
HOSED BY PBS AGAIN
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,713
Default

Just finished my yearly PC in IAH, and word is that Larry would rather wait for the 787 vs getting more B777's due to the substantial fuel savings of the 787. Will be interesting to see what happens. I hope Boeing gets their act together soon since now it seems they're promising things they can't deliver, are are starting to mimic Airbus in the delay arena. Once the dollar starts getting stronger, then Airbus will be more cost advantageous, and Boeing will be looking like the big three automakers. I smell another corporate bailout headed this way ........
ewrbasedpilot is offline  
Old 12-05-2008, 05:45 AM
  #6  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 44
Default

I have a feeling that someday the history books will show that these program delays led to the rise of China's AVIC as a major player in the aircraft manufacturing industry. They're years away from that now, but it will happen. You heard it hear first.

Skyward80
skyward80 is offline  
Old 12-05-2008, 06:44 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ebl14's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: 73N
Posts: 862
Default

Boeing is paying for all of its outsourcing. When you build all the main components of the aircraft in completely different parts of the world by the cheapest bidder this is what you get, an really expensive erector-set airplane that doesn't quite fit. The machinists struck because thier new contract had little to no protection from outsourcing thier jobs. I find it ironic that boeing blames delays on the machinists when it was the outsourcing in the first place that caused the delay.

Last edited by ebl14; 12-05-2008 at 06:44 AM. Reason: missing a T
ebl14 is offline  
Old 12-05-2008, 06:46 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DAL4EVER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: 88B - Loud Pipes Save Lives
Posts: 1,597
Default

Originally Posted by skyward80
I have a feeling that someday the history books will show that these program delays led to the rise of China's AVIC as a major player in the aircraft manufacturing industry. They're years away from that now, but it will happen. You heard it hear first.

Skyward80
Hopefully not. But you may be right. The main reason for these delays is that Boeing decided to contract out much of the component manufacturing to the lowest bidder rather than doing it in-house. The contract suppliers it seems made Boeing some very nice promises. The salesman told Boeing "Oh yeah, we can build that no problem. We've got tremendous experience in doing what you want and we do it cheaper than anyone else." Truth is, they didn't have the experience or know what they were doing. Now Boeing is paying the price in a mis-managed program whose health relies on a bunch of inexperienced suppliers.

Back to China, if you think this is bad for Boeing could you imagine a rice farmer riding to work on a rickshaw then trying to assemble a complex plane? That plane would frighten me.
DAL4EVER is offline  
Old 12-05-2008, 09:40 AM
  #9  
On Reserve
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 16
Default

Originally Posted by Ottopilot
I just heard that the 787 is heavier than planned, which means more fuel burn and less range. They are still trying to get back to planned weights. First few planes might be heavier than planned.
At one of the prior media briefings, Shanahan mentioned that the block point weight improvements would emerge from LN20/LN21.

Given the strenuous tests the first test 787's will go through, coupled with the delays, I'm sure Boeing will compensate those customers handsomely, ANA especially!
FBEDCOM is offline  
Old 12-05-2008, 10:31 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 945
Default

Originally Posted by DAL4EVER
Hopefully not. But you may be right. The main reason for these delays is that Boeing decided to contract out much of the component manufacturing to the lowest bidder rather than doing it in-house. The contract suppliers it seems made Boeing some very nice promises. The salesman told Boeing "Oh yeah, we can build that no problem. We've got tremendous experience in doing what you want and we do it cheaper than anyone else." Truth is, they didn't have the experience or know what they were doing. Now Boeing is paying the price in a mis-managed program whose health relies on a bunch of inexperienced suppliers.
While you may be right about the "mechanics" of the delay problem, the blame, IMHO, still rests with Boeing. For something this important, they should have done their homework a little more thoroughly regarding the capabilities of their suppliers.

At this rate, 787 will be out on the street about the same time as A350EX (or whatever it's called).
Mink is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sailingfun
Mergers and Acquisitions
46
12-07-2008 10:38 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices