Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Why is it unacceptable to criticize SWA? >

Why is it unacceptable to criticize SWA?

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Why is it unacceptable to criticize SWA?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-29-2008, 05:56 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
328dude's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: SWA/FO
Posts: 309
Default

Same thing happened at American in LIT. They however, didn't elect to go missed. We all know the outcome of that.
328dude is offline  
Old 10-29-2008, 06:28 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
KC10 FATboy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Legacy FO
Posts: 4,105
Default

Side question ... does the flaps on a Boeing 737 "blow up" if the max extended airspeed is exceeded?

I only ask because I was on a SWA flight sitting right behind the wing ... and the flaps kept moving up, then back down, then back up ... this happened all the way down to final. I only noticed it because I was qual'd on the DC10 at the time and it has flap overspeed protection up to 220knots, and I was surprised to hear the hydraulics kick on and off.

-Fatty
KC10 FATboy is offline  
Old 10-29-2008, 08:54 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
wingnutC-17's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 116
Default

Yes, the 737 does have flap load relief or "blow-up" as you say, in the landing settings only. Flaps 30 or 40.
wingnutC-17 is offline  
Old 10-29-2008, 09:43 PM
  #14  
Avoiding Memphis
 
pilot141's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2005
Position: Intl Feeder Jet
Posts: 504
Default

Originally Posted by 328dude
Same thing happened at American in LIT. They however, didn't elect to go missed. We all know the outcome of that.
Yeah, but there were several more things involved there including a Chief Pilot, duty day limits, an F/O on probation and afraid to speak up, etc.

Are you defending the SWA practice of diving into an airport that everyone else considers closed? Or are you saying the only thing the AA guys did wrong was NOT go missed?

This is, I think, the crux of the OPs point - the perception (at least among the the other pilots groups) that SWA guys are ready to hang it out there, and ATC is willing to comply.

This might not be a bad thing - sometimes you have to say "I'm going in". The question is where does the lean forward attitude meet the unsafe attitude? Or does it?

Of course I could be way off base and this should just become another SWA bashfest or lovefest.
pilot141 is offline  
Old 10-29-2008, 09:55 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 712
Default

Originally Posted by Pelican
Fortl-
I appreciate and respect your post, it was respectful and was a great counter-argument to that specific story. I agree that the 3rd person revision of the story does not hold as much water as if it were 1st person. That is why I said upfront that it was indeed 3rd person.

As far as equipment on-board the aircraft, I don't know what they all had. However, if I saw an aircraft abort a takeoff due to some weather warning system they had, I would probably think twice before I blasted off myself.

As far as AA's decision to abort or taxi clear and SWA's decision to continue and takeoff.....I'm not condemming either, it just seems like a bi-polar outlook on safety vs mission.

Again, this is ALL 3rd person, I was not there, I did not see the weather, I'm just using this as an example.
Pelican,

I have seen your posts before and am wondering why you continue to pick at swa? Either you have too much time on your hands or there is some jealousy going on. Just my opinion, but seems like your grasping for anything that puts some negative spin on swa. Don't you have anything better to do?
Herkulesdrvr is offline  
Old 10-29-2008, 11:13 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
flaps 9's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2005
Position: 737 F/O
Posts: 500
Default

I think the reason why SWA guys get a little bent when folks talk about us is because of all the lies and half truths.

Do u realize that WN has a FDAP program? It's on all of our -700's and on quite a few of the -300's. Basically the company sets parameters and we have to follow them. Explanations are sought for non compliance. All approaches are to be "stabilized" at 1000 ft agl, if not it's a mandatory go around. We fly the -700's using MASI speeds for flap settings. No speed brakes with flaps extended and the list goes on. It's not your fathers SWA.

We operate at cost index of 20, so if anything we're flying slower than others unless it's required by a SID/STAR. We will of course honor an ATC request for a speed increase.

The motto of SWA is "we work hard and we play harder" Nowhere in that phrase does it say "we break the rules and bend airplanes"

If you have some honest questions about how we operate, feel free to ask.
flaps 9 is offline  
Old 10-29-2008, 11:51 PM
  #17  
Avoiding Memphis
 
pilot141's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2005
Position: Intl Feeder Jet
Posts: 504
Default

Originally Posted by flaps 9
I think the reason why SWA guys get a little bent when folks talk about us is because of all the lies and half truths.

Do u realize that WN has a FDAP program? It's on all of our -700's and on quite a few of the -300's. Basically the company sets parameters and we have to follow them. Explanations are sought for non compliance. All approaches are to be "stabilized" at 1000 ft agl, if not it's a mandatory go around. We fly the -700's using MASI speeds for flap settings. No speed brakes with flaps extended and the list goes on. It's not your fathers SWA.

We operate at cost index of 20, so if anything we're flying slower than others unless it's required by a SID/STAR. We will of course honor an ATC request for a speed increase.

The motto of SWA is "we work hard and we play harder" Nowhere in that phrase does it say "we break the rules and bend airplanes"

If you have some honest questions about how we operate, feel free to ask.
Hey, I agree with you - I think most of the SWA hate is from ignorance.

I think what we are getting at here is a cultural thing, which is hard to nail down, especially with a lot of new hires.
pilot141 is offline  
Old 10-30-2008, 01:20 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: C47 PIC/747-400 SIC
Posts: 2,100
Default

SWA,best culture of any airline,bar none,all my personal experiences with them have been pleasant ones, I sense a lot of envy among those stuck in airlines with cultures that are less than employee friendly,the energy that goes into negatively posting on these boards may be better used to clean ones own house. my.02.
727C47 is offline  
Old 10-30-2008, 02:00 AM
  #19  
Avoiding Memphis
 
pilot141's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2005
Position: Intl Feeder Jet
Posts: 504
Default

Nice Drnka post. I've done those myself.

It's the culture we are talking about - that of "push it" or not. No pleasantness or envy involved.

Anyway, I'm done - I've got no dog in this fight.

I'll let some SWA guys in here to defend themselves if they feel they need to.
pilot141 is offline  
Old 10-30-2008, 04:00 AM
  #20  
HOSED BY PBS AGAIN
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,713
Default

Originally Posted by pilot141
.............- I think most of the SWA hate is from ignorance.

...........
Who says anyone HATES SWA? I think a lot of pilots on this forum are just tired of the "we are the best, so get over it" mantra. SWA IS a great airline, but the continual bragging about how great they are is getting old too. Not everyone wants to fly the B737 domestically their whole career. Some here don't understand that.....................
ewrbasedpilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DWN3GRN
Major
81
11-17-2008 01:04 PM
Redwood
Major
73
09-06-2008 06:06 AM
Pelican
Major
68
08-21-2008 07:23 PM
flybynuts
Major
55
08-19-2008 08:35 AM
Pelican
Major
8
08-11-2008 02:51 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices