Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Northwest SJ Details

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-26-2006, 08:19 AM
  #61  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ryane946's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: FO, looking left
Posts: 1,060
Default

It is clear that Northwest has the lowest pay scale already of any of the majors. My favorite is the 747-200 scale. My god, there are guys flying jets that hold 10 people making that kind of money.
ryane946 is offline  
Old 03-26-2006, 08:36 AM
  #62  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,598
Default

Originally Posted by ryane946
My favorite is the 747-200 scale.
Aren't those guys based in Alaska?
iahflyr is offline  
Old 03-26-2006, 09:46 AM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 973
Default

Originally Posted by duffrick
Reagrding point 1. Perhaps we could have done better. The jury is still out on that one.

Regarding point 2. You'll be hard pressed to find any pilot on the property with a higher seniority than 2500 that is going to want to strike on the scope language in this TA. The goal, I believe, was to protect the DC-9 flying and to the greatest extent possible protect the 51-76 seat flying. I think they accomplished that. The cat got out of the hat years ago with Delta caving on their scope, allowing the flying of up to 70 seats to be flown by ASA and Comair. All the other carriers dumb enough to have RJ flying quickly followed.

We didn't give anything in this TA that is not already in existence at the other legacy carriers already. Alright, I'll give you credit for CAL, they have no 70 seat or higher flying, but the others...
Actually we did give up something in this TA....The granting of NWA to create a seperate airline with a seperate certificate and a seperate seniority list is unlike Song or TED........Secondly I am around 2300 seniority and I'll be voting NO for that very reason. This goes beyond scope. If this TA is approved (and IMHO it won't be)This will be the beginning of end of NWA
reddog25 is offline  
Old 03-26-2006, 12:21 PM
  #64  
Line Holder
 
duffrick's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: A320
Posts: 71
Default

Originally Posted by reddog25
Actually we did give up something in this TA....The granting of NWA to create a seperate airline with a seperate certificate and a seperate seniority list is unlike Song or TED........Secondly I am around 2300 seniority and I'll be voting NO for that very reason. This goes beyond scope. If this TA is approved (and IMHO it won't be)This will be the beginning of end of NWA
It is my impression that the purchased Independence Air operating certificate will be used for a 51-76 seat category wholly owned airline. This isn't unlike any other wholly owned unit owned by NWA. It has been my understanding that we were trying to protect primarily the 77-110 seat flying, thus protecting DC-9 replacement flying. This TA does that, right?

It is certainly not my position to say that all guys with seniority will vote for this TA and you are a perfect example of a more senior guy voting against it. However, my very informal poll based on the pilots I have talked with still tells me that by and large, the more senior pilots at NWA will vote for this TA and the more junior against. There is no doubt that this will be a very tight vote.
duffrick is offline  
Old 03-26-2006, 12:28 PM
  #65  
Line Holder
 
duffrick's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: A320
Posts: 71
Default

Originally Posted by 757Driver
Didn't call you a scab but your diatribe certainly sounded like one. You aren't a scab until you actually cross a picket line so point taken.



Been there, done that. Have you ever been furloughed? I have and returned to greener pastures.





I hope you truly do mean this. This TA is a gigantic, unfinished Peice of Sh!t and should not be ratified period.

Best of luck with your decision.
You, my friend would make a good politician. You can confidently say the following without calling me scab: Lets hope there's never a strike at NWA or you'll have Duffrick and his buddies leaping across the picket line.

(PS, I know several NWA guys who will be voting "No" on this so I'm only directing this at Duffrick, not the others on here who will obviously reject this Piece of Sh!t)

I guess a spade's a spade.

I have been furloughed, not at NWA, but elsewhere.

I don't disagree with you that this TA has a very potent smell of manure to it. I am certainly not happy with it, but it beats UAL, AAA, AWA and it is not far behind CAL and AA.

Last edited by duffrick; 03-26-2006 at 12:47 PM.
duffrick is offline  
Old 03-26-2006, 01:09 PM
  #66  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 973
Default NWA Subsidiary

Originally Posted by duffrick
It is my impression that the purchased Independence Air operating certificate will be used for a 51-76 seat category wholly owned airline. This isn't unlike any other wholly owned unit owned by NWA. It has been my understanding that we were trying to protect primarily the 77-110 seat flying, thus protecting DC-9 replacement flying. This TA does that, right?

It is certainly not my position to say that all guys with seniority will vote for this TA and you are a perfect example of a more senior guy voting against it. However, my very informal poll based on the pilots I have talked with still tells me that by and large, the more senior pilots at NWA will vote for this TA and the more junior against. There is no doubt that this will be a very tight vote.
Not sure this TA does protect DC-9 flying....NWA does not have any wholly owned subsidiarys. Champion is a possible exception as it is owned by NWA Vacation group. Pinnacle and Mesaba are not owned by NWA, nor does NWA have a majority stock in those 2 companies. The TA allows NWA to fly up to 90 SJets if it is flown by the subsidiary and not by Mesaba or Pinnacle or Mesa aor COMAIR or etc...You are correct that the DC-9 replacement will increase as NWA adds additional jets to the SJet operation. However those jets will replace DC-9 flying at 8% less pay. There is nothing to prevent NWA from parking DC-9s. Please also remember that the TA allows NWA to purchase 51-76 seat jets certified for 86-90 seats...duhhhh....increasing the seating to 90 seats from 51-76 seat is just a sideletter away....VOTING NO
reddog25 is offline  
Old 03-26-2006, 07:29 PM
  #67  
Need More Callouts
 
757Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Unbridled Enthusiasm
Posts: 2,143
Default

Originally Posted by duffrick
I don't disagree with you that this TA has a very potent smell of manure to it. I am certainly not happy with it, but it beats UAL, AAA, AWA and it is not far behind CAL and AA.
Couldn't disagree with you more. This unfinished, fill in the blanks at NWA Managements discretion document, is the WORST T/A out there and doesn't even come close to the piece o' crap I find myself working under, (see CAL).

Make no mistake, accept this and you fall into dead last place with future give-backs to come at your managements whim. Your negotiating committee can and will do far better than this with your support.

Last edited by 757Driver; 03-26-2006 at 07:31 PM.
757Driver is offline  
Old 03-28-2006, 06:20 AM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: A350
Posts: 193
Default

some airline analysts believe nwa will be able to do 70-75% of all DC-9 flying with the CRJ-700 that mesa,pinnacle,mesaba or commair will obtain. nwa is on its way to becoming a virtual airline...no planes , no mechanics, no pilots = NO PROBLEMS. the present management at nwa just wants to be a big travel agency and collect 5% of all tickest sold...they have no viable business plan as of yet.
astrojet is offline  
Old 03-28-2006, 06:25 AM
  #69  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: A350
Posts: 193
Default

the other scenario is ala swissair...nwa buys independence air....nwa sells the cargo division to dasburg at DHL...nwa goes chapter 7...in a fire sale some assets are sold and the 319's(already on flyi cert) along with some 330's are transfered to independence air. now you have a lcc with some nice assets and highly experienced employees.
astrojet is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gordon C
Major
5
11-20-2018 11:58 PM
redbaron84
Major
1
12-25-2005 09:49 PM
captain_drew
Major
0
08-19-2005 03:16 PM
Sir James
Major
2
03-17-2005 04:35 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices