UAL going out of business?
#81
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
I got over the United deathwatch threads long ago. I've seen far too many of them to bother me anymore. I just want to make sure that we're speaking factually correct numbers.
I let your $8M/day loss number slide, as I have no idea what the daily loss at United is currently running. I suspect that you don't either, but are making an educated guess. However, you're making that number appear as if it's $8M/day in cash. A portion of the quarterly/daily loss is composed of depreciating assets. Depreciating assets aren't a hit to the bottom line.
Also, there was another fare hike initiated yesterday by United (they've initiated most of the fare hikes lately) and matched by both American and Delta. With AMR and DAL matching, it's got a very good chance of sticking. http://cbs11tv.com/local/airfares.in....2.731606.html
All of the fare hikes will help, but will also result in decreased passenger traffic. AMR made a good decision by reducing capacity. United previously announced the same. All airlines (with the exception of Southwest) are losing money in the current environment. Likely on just about every single flight. The only way to reduce the bleeding is to trim the flight schedule. Hopefully United will do it in a prudent manner, such as dumping all of the PHX-LAX RJs and upguaging with less frequency (that's one route; there are plenty of others that could be upguaged with less frequency). I think that the airlines who upguage with less frequency will end up being in the best shape when we emerge from the current downturn.
It's going to be bloody; I expect to see as many carriers file chap 11 as did post-911. How many go ch 7 is the unknown. I suspect more than a couple will be out of business. We're also likely to see more pilots on furlough than any previous peak. Scary times for all; this isn't limited to United.
I let your $8M/day loss number slide, as I have no idea what the daily loss at United is currently running. I suspect that you don't either, but are making an educated guess. However, you're making that number appear as if it's $8M/day in cash. A portion of the quarterly/daily loss is composed of depreciating assets. Depreciating assets aren't a hit to the bottom line.
Also, there was another fare hike initiated yesterday by United (they've initiated most of the fare hikes lately) and matched by both American and Delta. With AMR and DAL matching, it's got a very good chance of sticking. http://cbs11tv.com/local/airfares.in....2.731606.html
All of the fare hikes will help, but will also result in decreased passenger traffic. AMR made a good decision by reducing capacity. United previously announced the same. All airlines (with the exception of Southwest) are losing money in the current environment. Likely on just about every single flight. The only way to reduce the bleeding is to trim the flight schedule. Hopefully United will do it in a prudent manner, such as dumping all of the PHX-LAX RJs and upguaging with less frequency (that's one route; there are plenty of others that could be upguaged with less frequency). I think that the airlines who upguage with less frequency will end up being in the best shape when we emerge from the current downturn.
It's going to be bloody; I expect to see as many carriers file chap 11 as did post-911. How many go ch 7 is the unknown. I suspect more than a couple will be out of business. We're also likely to see more pilots on furlough than any previous peak. Scary times for all; this isn't limited to United.
#82
It's going to be bloody; I expect to see as many carriers file chap 11 as did post-911. How many go ch 7 is the unknown. I suspect more than a couple will be out of business. We're also likely to see more pilots on furlough than any previous peak. Scary times for all; this isn't limited to United.
I would say the only real savior besides fair/fee hikes (which I dont think will be enough) is code share partners with a vested interest. United better hope Lufthansa is willing to cough up some cash and Delta better hope AF/KLM throws some money their way. Its about outlasting the other guys this time. This time carriers will be allowed to die.
#83
United does indeed have some crown jewels. Best of all are their coveted overseas routes to Asia. Yet, they recently announced they cannot take advantage of the newly awarded routes from San Francisco to Guanghou due to $$$. Pretty sorry state of affairs when an airline cannot afford to increase revenue by expanding into a lucrative international market due to stagnation in the domestic market.
One of the nails in the coffins of TWA and Pan Am was the sale of their London-Heathrow routes to American and United respectively. This is more my point when referring to the crown jewels of United. United can generate cash through fire sales of routes and assets. Unfortunately, at TWA, our uncle, Carl Icahn did this quite masterfully. i.e Heathrow routes & Philly/Baltimore-Gatwick etc. etc.
"Happiness is Positive Cash flow" Carl Icahn circa 1988.
#84
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: MD-11
Posts: 395
Triple "P" (hope that's ok ?!?)
One of the nails in the coffins of TWA and Pan Am was the sale of their London-Heathrow routes to American and United respectively. This is more my point when referring to the crown jewels of United. United can generate cash through fire sales of routes and assets. Unfortunately, at TWA, our uncle, Carl Icahn did this quite masterfully. i.e Heathrow routes & Philly/Baltimore-Gatwick etc. etc.
"Happiness is Positive Cash flow" Carl Icahn circa 1988.
One of the nails in the coffins of TWA and Pan Am was the sale of their London-Heathrow routes to American and United respectively. This is more my point when referring to the crown jewels of United. United can generate cash through fire sales of routes and assets. Unfortunately, at TWA, our uncle, Carl Icahn did this quite masterfully. i.e Heathrow routes & Philly/Baltimore-Gatwick etc. etc.
"Happiness is Positive Cash flow" Carl Icahn circa 1988.
#85
I certainly won't disagree with you regarding their incompetent management, but UAL has only been in chapter 11 once. As of today,anyway.
#87
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: dogstyle
Posts: 375
Hi.
UAL:
The 1st problem that UAL had, was that their Strategic Plan, approved by an idiot judge, to get out of their former CH11 bankruptcy was based on $50/barrell of oil. The people who made the plan, and the judge who approved it were not realistic at all. Since coming out of bankruptcy, all their CEO has been thinking about was merging, when he should've update their strategic plan for very expensive oil.
Oil/Gasoline Pricing:
I believe that the amount of speculation, and weak US dollar in the current price are both negligible. It's all about supply and demand.
Squawk Box just (May 20) had an analyst on who said that gasoline will inevitably be $12-$15/barrel before it goes down (because of conservation and the rise of renewable fuels). I hope it doesn't go above $8-$10/barrel.
Here is what T. Boone Pickens just had to say.
Background: Pickens made a TON of money in oil. He just bought $2B worth of wind turbines, and wants the US to move to natural gas as a transportation fuel in the short term, until we can be mostly renewable fuels for transportation.
In the past, many guys have said Pickens is just working the doom and gloom to drive oil prices up to make more $. But, as you can see, he has basically abandoned oil as a long-term investment.
cliff
YIP
UAL:
The 1st problem that UAL had, was that their Strategic Plan, approved by an idiot judge, to get out of their former CH11 bankruptcy was based on $50/barrell of oil. The people who made the plan, and the judge who approved it were not realistic at all. Since coming out of bankruptcy, all their CEO has been thinking about was merging, when he should've update their strategic plan for very expensive oil.
Oil/Gasoline Pricing:
I believe that the amount of speculation, and weak US dollar in the current price are both negligible. It's all about supply and demand.
Squawk Box just (May 20) had an analyst on who said that gasoline will inevitably be $12-$15/barrel before it goes down (because of conservation and the rise of renewable fuels). I hope it doesn't go above $8-$10/barrel.
Here is what T. Boone Pickens just had to say.
Background: Pickens made a TON of money in oil. He just bought $2B worth of wind turbines, and wants the US to move to natural gas as a transportation fuel in the short term, until we can be mostly renewable fuels for transportation.
In the past, many guys have said Pickens is just working the doom and gloom to drive oil prices up to make more $. But, as you can see, he has basically abandoned oil as a long-term investment.
cliff
YIP
#88
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: MD-11
Posts: 395
#89
Here is the latest speculation about the possible merger with United and Airways.
The word is that United is in a serious hole and may be in BK by summer. It is believed that Doug Parker of Airways is sitting back waiting for United to go into BK so he can aquire them dirt cheap. He would get more airplanes, routes, etc., all at liquidation prices. At that point, it would be a buyout, not a merger, so he would retain his super cheap labor costs he has at Airways currently. As far as jobs, it looks like it would be good for Airways, and a disaster for the United folks.
The word is that United is in a serious hole and may be in BK by summer. It is believed that Doug Parker of Airways is sitting back waiting for United to go into BK so he can aquire them dirt cheap. He would get more airplanes, routes, etc., all at liquidation prices. At that point, it would be a buyout, not a merger, so he would retain his super cheap labor costs he has at Airways currently. As far as jobs, it looks like it would be good for Airways, and a disaster for the United folks.
#90
Here is the latest speculation about the possible merger with United and Airways.
The word is that United is in a serious hole and may be in BK by summer. It is believed that Doug Parker of Airways is sitting back waiting for United to go into BK so he can aquire them dirt cheap. He would get more airplanes, routes, etc., all at liquidation prices. At that point, it would be a buyout, not a merger, so he would retain his super cheap labor costs he has at Airways currently. As far as jobs, it looks like it would be good for Airways, and a disaster for the United folks.
The word is that United is in a serious hole and may be in BK by summer. It is believed that Doug Parker of Airways is sitting back waiting for United to go into BK so he can aquire them dirt cheap. He would get more airplanes, routes, etc., all at liquidation prices. At that point, it would be a buyout, not a merger, so he would retain his super cheap labor costs he has at Airways currently. As far as jobs, it looks like it would be good for Airways, and a disaster for the United folks.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post