Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
UAL going out of business? >

UAL going out of business?

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

UAL going out of business?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-24-2008, 03:21 PM
  #71  
Gets Weekends Off
 
fireman0174's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: Retired 121 pilot
Posts: 1,033
Default

Originally Posted by PicklePausePull
United does indeed have some crown jewels. Best of all are their coveted overseas routes to Asia. Yet, they recently announced they cannot take advantage of the newly awarded routes from San Francisco to Guanghou due to $$$. Pretty sorry state of affairs when an airline cannot afford to increase revenue by expanding into a lucrative international market due to stagnation in the domestic market.
Virtually every new market loses money in the beginning. With that huge lose for their last quarter ($500+ million?), it's not hard for me to understand why they would want to delay it's startup.

That may very well be the first time I've "supported" a UAL management decision here.
fireman0174 is offline  
Old 05-24-2008, 03:51 PM
  #72  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: MD-11 F/O
Posts: 244
Default

Originally Posted by blastoff
Show us where there was an infusion of cash from the US treasury going to the airlines (Related to Ch 11). Chapter 11 is a law, not a tax code. If you're complaining about taxpayers paying for court proceedings themselves...there are a hell of a lot more wasteful things the government funds than the courts. If we are a society of laws, you have to fund courts.

The Bankruptcy Courts telling creditors to "take a hike" is not a subsidy.

By your same reasoning, the retail furniture industry is "Government Subsidized."
in 1990 Standard & Poor's Corp. put airport revenue bonds from Cleveland, Houston and Denver -- all major Continental hubs -- the ratings were lowered due to Continental's bankruptcy. The city didn't get back all of their money... just like the state of Minnesota is taking a hit from nwa. Minnesota gave tax breaks and supported building a maint facility in Minnesota. That was funded by tax dollars, and nwa walked away from it in bankruptcy. Ultimately, this is a form of government assistance that carriers like AA haven't taken advantage of.
cessnapilot is offline  
Old 05-24-2008, 06:47 PM
  #73  
Gets Weekends Off
 
captjns's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Posts: 5,995
Default

Originally Posted by cessnapilot
in 1990 Standard & Poor's Corp. put airport revenue bonds from Cleveland, Houston and Denver -- all major Continental hubs -- the ratings were lowered due to Continental's bankruptcy. The city didn't get back all of their money... just like the state of Minnesota is taking a hit from nwa. Minnesota gave tax breaks and supported building a maint facility in Minnesota. That was funded by tax dollars, and nwa walked away from it in bankruptcy. Ultimately, this is a form of government assistance that carriers like AA haven't taken advantage of.
Lets not forget the city of Indianapolis' contribution to UAL when they built a MX facility with a jetway to boot, which was never used.
captjns is offline  
Old 05-24-2008, 07:57 PM
  #74  
Gets Weekends Off
 
blastoff's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 1,531
Default

Originally Posted by captjns
Lets not forget the city of Indianapolis' contribution to UAL when they built a MX facility with a jetway to boot, which was never used.
Originally Posted by cessnapilot
in 1990 Standard & Poor's Corp. put airport revenue bonds from Cleveland, Houston and Denver -- all major Continental hubs -- the ratings were lowered due to Continental's bankruptcy. The city didn't get back all of their money... just like the state of Minnesota is taking a hit from nwa. Minnesota gave tax breaks and supported building a maint facility in Minnesota. That was funded by tax dollars, and nwa walked away from it in bankruptcy. Ultimately, this is a form of government assistance that carriers like AA haven't taken advantage of.
Which is not to say municipalities haven't done the same types of things for other industries to keep business in town. The original poster was implying direct government subsidy as a result of CH. 11 that isn't given to anyone else. Well Chapter 11 has been used by a variety of Corporations...don't forget that its purpose is to make a company more valuable to its creditors if it is successfully re-structured than it would be in a Ch 7 Liquidation.

The best examples you can come up with is the government getting screwed as a creditor, which isn't the same thing.
blastoff is offline  
Old 05-25-2008, 08:30 AM
  #75  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
Default

Originally Posted by Oldfreightdawg
My sister is a director over at EXO (now called world headquarters). They held a senior staff meeting yesterday. She called my father in tears this morning, they're planning 25% management layoff, and if things don't improve by summer, UAL will be out of business.

This is no let's scare the employees into more givebacks strategy, there's nothing left to give back...
$2.9B and $3B in unencumbered assets, yet going out of business by summer? Not likely.
Do some simple math. Let's say UAL borrows 50 cents on the dollar against assets - that'd be $1.5B. 2.9 + 1.5 = 4.4B.
Lets say that at $1B is the point where UAL's insolvent and going chap 7.
That would leave $3.4B starting 1 April to burn through. So lets say that we're talking about going out of business in 150 days to keep with your summer rumor. That'd be a daily cash burn rate in excess of $22M. Not likely; even during the worst times post-911, UAL was losing around $10M daily.
I'm not buying it.
Andy is offline  
Old 05-25-2008, 09:07 AM
  #76  
Gets Weekends Off
 
cma2407's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: Row well and live...
Posts: 494
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
That'd be a daily cash burn rate in excess of $22M. Not likely; even during the worst times post-911, UAL was losing around $10M daily.
I'm not buying it.
Oh, that's much better.





Hope they make it and this whole mess stabilizes.
cma2407 is offline  
Old 05-25-2008, 09:25 AM
  #77  
A moment please...
 
JetPiedmont's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: Just passin' thru
Posts: 769
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
$2.9B and $3B in unencumbered assets, yet going out of business by summer? Not likely.
Do some simple math. Let's say UAL borrows 50 cents on the dollar against assets - that'd be $1.5B. 2.9 + 1.5 = 4.4B.
Lets say that at $1B is the point where UAL's insolvent and going chap 7.
That would leave $3.4B starting 1 April to burn through. So lets say that we're talking about going out of business in 150 days to keep with your summer rumor. That'd be a daily cash burn rate in excess of $22M. Not likely; even during the worst times post-911, UAL was losing around $10M daily.
I'm not buying it.
You better pray for that loan, Andy! BTW, UAL went Chapt 11 with 2 billion in cash last time. Their unrestricted cash now is 2.4 billion. Are there banks willing, in this credit environment, to loan an airline losing over 8 million a day 50 cents on the dollar?
JetPiedmont is offline  
Old 05-25-2008, 11:39 AM
  #78  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
Default

Originally Posted by JetPiedmont
You better pray for that loan, Andy! BTW, UAL went Chapt 11 with 2 billion in cash last time. Their unrestricted cash now is 2.4 billion. Are there banks willing, in this credit environment, to loan an airline losing over 8 million a day 50 cents on the dollar?
I don't worry about the fate of United or any other airline; there are far more important things in life to concern myself with.
Chapter 11 is a far different fate than chapter 7, as has been implied by this thread.
Very reminscent of 2003-2005; lotsa pilots licking their chops over United's route structure. Maybe this time you'll be right?

Where are you pulling out $2.4B? The standard metric is cash, equivalents and short term investments.
But if you're going to use the $2B number as the chap 11 number, which included $344M in restricted cash and $612M in short term investments, you should at least do the same for UAL's current position. You're making an apples to oranges comparison.
Now, let's do apples to apples:
30 Sep 2002 (United filed Dec 02): Cash = $1.1011B, Short term investments = $612M, restricted cash = $344M.
31 Mar 2008: Cash = $2.438B, short term investments = $486M, restricted cash = $348M.


But again, the topic of this thread was not United declaring chap 11; it was specifically about United going chap 7. So you've now changed the threshold to less than chap 7 and distorted the numbers to prove that United's minutes away from filing chap 11. Cool.
Andy is offline  
Old 05-25-2008, 12:00 PM
  #79  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,597
Default

Originally Posted by JetPiedmont
Are there banks willing, in this credit environment, to loan an airline losing over 8 million a day 50 cents on the dollar?
Better question is are they willing to let the most profitable frequent flier program (with 45 million members worth over 15 billion dollars) die out.

Of all the airlines to lend money to, I think UAL has one of the best shots of getting outside financing. You can always replace bad management. But your going to have a lot harder time growing an airline with so much going for it as United currently has. The frequent flier program is just one example.

I really want to see the 2nd quarter results before I make any decisions about legacy carriers and the possibility of Ch.11. I think every airline is going to have a real tough time come fall. If United goes into Ch.11 come fall, they won't be the only one there (not even the only legacy).
iahflyr is offline  
Old 05-25-2008, 12:22 PM
  #80  
A moment please...
 
JetPiedmont's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: Just passin' thru
Posts: 769
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
I don't worry about the fate of United or any other airline; there are far more important things in life to concern myself with.
Chapter 11 is a far different fate than chapter 7, as has been implied by this thread.
Very reminscent of 2003-2005; lotsa pilots licking their chops over United's route structure. Maybe this time you'll be right?

Where are you pulling out $2.4B? The standard metric is cash, equivalents and short term investments.
But if you're going to use the $2B number as the chap 11 number, which included $344M in restricted cash and $612M in short term investments, you should at least do the same for UAL's current position. You're making an apples to oranges comparison.
Now, let's do apples to apples:
30 Sep 2002 (United filed Dec 02): Cash = $1.1011B, Short term investments = $612M, restricted cash = $344M.
31 Mar 2008: Cash = $2.438B, short term investments = $486M, restricted cash = $348M.


But again, the topic of this thread was not United declaring chap 11; it was specifically about United going chap 7. So you've now changed the threshold to less than chap 7 and distorted the numbers to prove that United's minutes away from filing chap 11. Cool.
You were speculating that UAL would go Ch 7 with 1 billion, I was simply recalling UAL going Ch 11 w/2.0 billion as matter of fact, which was accurate by your own numbers. I also stated that UAL has 2.4 billion unrestricted cash at the end of Q1, which is accurate. I did nor attempt to distort or change your argument at all. You can make any argument about Ch 7 or UAL's condition you want. Allow me the same.

I too have many friends at UAL and do not wish to see them on the street. If I touched a nerve in you through my comments I appoligize.
JetPiedmont is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
palgia841
Major
9
12-07-2007 07:11 PM
Low & Slow
Major
37
08-23-2007 05:07 PM
LAfrequentflyer
Hangar Talk
2
02-01-2006 05:39 AM
HSLD
Major
14
01-30-2006 01:08 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
08-25-2005 09:11 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices