UAL going out of business?
#71
United does indeed have some crown jewels. Best of all are their coveted overseas routes to Asia. Yet, they recently announced they cannot take advantage of the newly awarded routes from San Francisco to Guanghou due to $$$. Pretty sorry state of affairs when an airline cannot afford to increase revenue by expanding into a lucrative international market due to stagnation in the domestic market.
That may very well be the first time I've "supported" a UAL management decision here.
#72
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: MD-11 F/O
Posts: 246
Show us where there was an infusion of cash from the US treasury going to the airlines (Related to Ch 11). Chapter 11 is a law, not a tax code. If you're complaining about taxpayers paying for court proceedings themselves...there are a hell of a lot more wasteful things the government funds than the courts. If we are a society of laws, you have to fund courts.
The Bankruptcy Courts telling creditors to "take a hike" is not a subsidy.
By your same reasoning, the retail furniture industry is "Government Subsidized."
The Bankruptcy Courts telling creditors to "take a hike" is not a subsidy.
By your same reasoning, the retail furniture industry is "Government Subsidized."
#73
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Posts: 6,009
in 1990 Standard & Poor's Corp. put airport revenue bonds from Cleveland, Houston and Denver -- all major Continental hubs -- the ratings were lowered due to Continental's bankruptcy. The city didn't get back all of their money... just like the state of Minnesota is taking a hit from nwa. Minnesota gave tax breaks and supported building a maint facility in Minnesota. That was funded by tax dollars, and nwa walked away from it in bankruptcy. Ultimately, this is a form of government assistance that carriers like AA haven't taken advantage of.
#74
in 1990 Standard & Poor's Corp. put airport revenue bonds from Cleveland, Houston and Denver -- all major Continental hubs -- the ratings were lowered due to Continental's bankruptcy. The city didn't get back all of their money... just like the state of Minnesota is taking a hit from nwa. Minnesota gave tax breaks and supported building a maint facility in Minnesota. That was funded by tax dollars, and nwa walked away from it in bankruptcy. Ultimately, this is a form of government assistance that carriers like AA haven't taken advantage of.
The best examples you can come up with is the government getting screwed as a creditor, which isn't the same thing.
#75
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
My sister is a director over at EXO (now called world headquarters). They held a senior staff meeting yesterday. She called my father in tears this morning, they're planning 25% management layoff, and if things don't improve by summer, UAL will be out of business.
This is no let's scare the employees into more givebacks strategy, there's nothing left to give back...
This is no let's scare the employees into more givebacks strategy, there's nothing left to give back...
Do some simple math. Let's say UAL borrows 50 cents on the dollar against assets - that'd be $1.5B. 2.9 + 1.5 = 4.4B.
Lets say that at $1B is the point where UAL's insolvent and going chap 7.
That would leave $3.4B starting 1 April to burn through. So lets say that we're talking about going out of business in 150 days to keep with your summer rumor. That'd be a daily cash burn rate in excess of $22M. Not likely; even during the worst times post-911, UAL was losing around $10M daily.
I'm not buying it.
#76
#77
$2.9B and $3B in unencumbered assets, yet going out of business by summer? Not likely.
Do some simple math. Let's say UAL borrows 50 cents on the dollar against assets - that'd be $1.5B. 2.9 + 1.5 = 4.4B.
Lets say that at $1B is the point where UAL's insolvent and going chap 7.
That would leave $3.4B starting 1 April to burn through. So lets say that we're talking about going out of business in 150 days to keep with your summer rumor. That'd be a daily cash burn rate in excess of $22M. Not likely; even during the worst times post-911, UAL was losing around $10M daily.
I'm not buying it.
Do some simple math. Let's say UAL borrows 50 cents on the dollar against assets - that'd be $1.5B. 2.9 + 1.5 = 4.4B.
Lets say that at $1B is the point where UAL's insolvent and going chap 7.
That would leave $3.4B starting 1 April to burn through. So lets say that we're talking about going out of business in 150 days to keep with your summer rumor. That'd be a daily cash burn rate in excess of $22M. Not likely; even during the worst times post-911, UAL was losing around $10M daily.
I'm not buying it.
#78
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
Chapter 11 is a far different fate than chapter 7, as has been implied by this thread.
Very reminscent of 2003-2005; lotsa pilots licking their chops over United's route structure. Maybe this time you'll be right?
Where are you pulling out $2.4B? The standard metric is cash, equivalents and short term investments.
But if you're going to use the $2B number as the chap 11 number, which included $344M in restricted cash and $612M in short term investments, you should at least do the same for UAL's current position. You're making an apples to oranges comparison.
Now, let's do apples to apples:
30 Sep 2002 (United filed Dec 02): Cash = $1.1011B, Short term investments = $612M, restricted cash = $344M.
31 Mar 2008: Cash = $2.438B, short term investments = $486M, restricted cash = $348M.
But again, the topic of this thread was not United declaring chap 11; it was specifically about United going chap 7. So you've now changed the threshold to less than chap 7 and distorted the numbers to prove that United's minutes away from filing chap 11. Cool.
#79
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,610
Of all the airlines to lend money to, I think UAL has one of the best shots of getting outside financing. You can always replace bad management. But your going to have a lot harder time growing an airline with so much going for it as United currently has. The frequent flier program is just one example.
I really want to see the 2nd quarter results before I make any decisions about legacy carriers and the possibility of Ch.11. I think every airline is going to have a real tough time come fall. If United goes into Ch.11 come fall, they won't be the only one there (not even the only legacy).
#80
I don't worry about the fate of United or any other airline; there are far more important things in life to concern myself with.
Chapter 11 is a far different fate than chapter 7, as has been implied by this thread.
Very reminscent of 2003-2005; lotsa pilots licking their chops over United's route structure. Maybe this time you'll be right?
Where are you pulling out $2.4B? The standard metric is cash, equivalents and short term investments.
But if you're going to use the $2B number as the chap 11 number, which included $344M in restricted cash and $612M in short term investments, you should at least do the same for UAL's current position. You're making an apples to oranges comparison.
Now, let's do apples to apples:
30 Sep 2002 (United filed Dec 02): Cash = $1.1011B, Short term investments = $612M, restricted cash = $344M.
31 Mar 2008: Cash = $2.438B, short term investments = $486M, restricted cash = $348M.
But again, the topic of this thread was not United declaring chap 11; it was specifically about United going chap 7. So you've now changed the threshold to less than chap 7 and distorted the numbers to prove that United's minutes away from filing chap 11. Cool.
Chapter 11 is a far different fate than chapter 7, as has been implied by this thread.
Very reminscent of 2003-2005; lotsa pilots licking their chops over United's route structure. Maybe this time you'll be right?
Where are you pulling out $2.4B? The standard metric is cash, equivalents and short term investments.
But if you're going to use the $2B number as the chap 11 number, which included $344M in restricted cash and $612M in short term investments, you should at least do the same for UAL's current position. You're making an apples to oranges comparison.
Now, let's do apples to apples:
30 Sep 2002 (United filed Dec 02): Cash = $1.1011B, Short term investments = $612M, restricted cash = $344M.
31 Mar 2008: Cash = $2.438B, short term investments = $486M, restricted cash = $348M.
But again, the topic of this thread was not United declaring chap 11; it was specifically about United going chap 7. So you've now changed the threshold to less than chap 7 and distorted the numbers to prove that United's minutes away from filing chap 11. Cool.
I too have many friends at UAL and do not wish to see them on the street. If I touched a nerve in you through my comments I appoligize.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post