Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
UAL going out of business? >

UAL going out of business?

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

UAL going out of business?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-27-2008, 04:46 PM
  #111  
Gets Weekends Off
 
buzzpat's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Urban chicken rancher.
Posts: 6,070
Default

At this rate, we'll all be working for Saudi Air or Air Emirates. Let's all hope (pray) that never comes to pass. For those of you who believe the war in Iraq is all about Halliburton, the Bushes, and oil...there you go. For those of you who believe we shouldn't be drilling in Anwar...there you go.

I know the Dems are supposed to be "industry friendly" but they ain't helping us out at the moment.
buzzpat is offline  
Old 05-27-2008, 07:10 PM
  #112  
Gets Weekends Off
 
newKnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 765-A
Posts: 6,844
Default

Originally Posted by buzzpat
At this rate, we'll all be working for Saudi Air or Air Emirates. Let's all hope (pray) that never comes to pass. For those of you who believe the war in Iraq is all about Halliburton, the Bushes, and oil...there you go. For those of you who believe we shouldn't be drilling in Anwar...there you go.

I know the Dems are supposed to be "industry friendly" but they ain't helping us out at the moment.
We already do. Have you seen the national debt? (Add Air China to the list)
newKnow is offline  
Old 06-01-2008, 07:00 AM
  #113  
Retired
 
DYNASTY HVY's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: whale wrangler
Posts: 3,527
Default

UAL can survive with a little paring back of the unprofitable rtes and they will be around a lot longer than some in here tend to think ,some years back they did exactly this so I would expect them to do it again also .
If she can hang for 2 years than she schould be ok for the long haul ,just remember this is cyclical always has been and always will be .
BTW some of those UAL crews have a lot of high time so who do you think gets the openings first at other carriers if she did fold ?

You can teach monkeys to fly !
DYNASTY HVY is offline  
Old 06-01-2008, 07:32 AM
  #114  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by There is line
I think UAL and NWA are the 2 domestic airlines that are both financially vulnerable and have an attractive route system.

Well I think AA and UAL are the most financially vunerable Legacies, but like your opinion, mine doesn't mean a thing.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 06-01-2008, 09:38 AM
  #115  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: CA 767
Posts: 402
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
Well I think AA and UAL are the most financially vunerable Legacies, but like your opinion, mine doesn't mean a thing.
AMR has over 5 BILLION in Cash/securites, over double UAL's 2.5 Billion.

I wouldn't AMR in a "most vunerable category"-
Nashmd11 is offline  
Old 06-01-2008, 10:07 AM
  #116  
Gets Weekends Off
 
fireman0174's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: Retired 121 pilot
Posts: 1,033
Default

Originally Posted by Nashmd11
AMR has over 5 BILLION in Cash/securites, over double UAL's 2.5 Billion.

I wouldn't AMR in a "most vunerable category"-
AMR also has a higher cost structure as I recall. But I agree, United is more "vulnerable", but I see other airlines failing before either of these two legacies.
fireman0174 is offline  
Old 06-01-2008, 10:34 AM
  #117  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Posts: 224
Default

Foreign carriers flying domestically is probably not going to happen. Why? Because the POTUS can't order the Froggies and Krauts back to work if they want to strike (which the Froggies are fond of). The US can't turn over its domestic system to the whims of foreign Railway Labor Act-free pilots.
RogAir is offline  
Old 06-01-2008, 11:13 AM
  #118  
Gets Weekends Off
 
newKnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 765-A
Posts: 6,844
Default

Originally Posted by RogAir
Foreign carriers flying domestically is probably not going to happen. Why? Because the POTUS can't order the Froggies and Krauts back to work if they want to strike (which the Froggies are fond of). The US can't turn over its domestic system to the whims of foreign Railway Labor Act-free pilots.
What the POTUS wants to do depends on who the POTUS is.
newKnow is offline  
Old 06-01-2008, 12:07 PM
  #119  
Gets Weekends Off
 
joel payne's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: B767A[ret.]
Posts: 593
Default

Maybe the airlines will do what the cruise lines do-
Incorporate offshore
Hire 3rd world crews
Now that's scary!
joel payne is offline  
Old 06-01-2008, 01:09 PM
  #120  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
Default

Originally Posted by joel payne
Maybe the airlines will do what the cruise lines do-
Incorporate offshore
Hire 3rd world crews
Now that's scary!
That'd be a pay raise for pilots flying in the US.
The airline and cruise line industries have nothing in common with respect to skill level required for the bulk of their labor. Where did you come up with that comparison?
Andy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
palgia841
Major
9
12-07-2007 07:11 PM
Low & Slow
Major
37
08-23-2007 05:07 PM
LAfrequentflyer
Hangar Talk
2
02-01-2006 05:39 AM
HSLD
Major
14
01-30-2006 01:08 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
08-25-2005 09:11 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices