Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
UAL going out of business? >

UAL going out of business?

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

UAL going out of business?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-27-2008, 07:12 AM
  #101  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SabreDriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: The Right One
Posts: 588
Default

Originally Posted by fireman0174
From Aviation Week:

United Airlines' share price is down more than 75% since the start of the year. UBS Investment Research analyst Kevin Crissey forecast this morning that United's parent company will lose a staggering $15.22 a share this year, up nearly 50% from his last estimate.

I guess that just proves that Kevin Crissey's last forecast really wasn't very good to start with, wonder what makes this one any better?

So sad to see a former giant cowering, a mere shadow of it's former self.
SabreDriver is offline  
Old 05-27-2008, 07:25 AM
  #102  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DAL4EVER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: 88B - Loud Pipes Save Lives
Posts: 1,597
Default

Originally Posted by Lambourne
What were the fuel predictions from DAL, NWA and US Air at their BK exits? Who was predicting 135bbl oil in financial reorganizations?
No one. According to ALPA's EF&A department, SWA can be profitable to $150/barrel. All U.S. carriers lose above $120. DAL was able to maintain profitability to $120/barrel. The same report had AA losing money at $90-95 and UAL was lower than that I believe.

The only hope anyone has is that your airline has enough cash on hand to be the last player at the dance. Cutting free snacks, charging for the first checked bag is a moot point right now. I believe this is how cabotage will become our reality. The legacies will all go bankrupt, because there is no access to the liquidity markets this time around there will be no way to restructure. Faced with the liquidation of the entire industry, the government will find it suitable to allow Air France, Lufthansa and BA to come in and buy the carriers to preserve the U.S. transportation system.

Global carriers will be the reality and the once shining star of the world's airline network (U.S. airlines) will be erased.
DAL4EVER is offline  
Old 05-27-2008, 07:40 AM
  #103  
I have shiny jet syndrome
 
RJtrashPilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: ELACS, FACs and SECs. Who doesn't love 'em?
Posts: 984
Default

Originally Posted by DAL4EVER
No one. According to ALPA's EF&A department, SWA can be profitable to $150/barrel. All U.S. carriers lose above $120. DAL was able to maintain profitability to $120/barrel. The same report had AA losing money at $90-95 and UAL was lower than that I believe.

The only hope anyone has is that your airline has enough cash on hand to be the last player at the dance. Cutting free snacks, charging for the first checked bag is a moot point right now. I believe this is how cabotage will become our reality. The legacies will all go bankrupt, because there is no access to the liquidity markets this time around there will be no way to restructure. Faced with the liquidation of the entire industry, the government will find it suitable to allow Air France, Lufthansa and BA to come in and buy the carriers to preserve the U.S. transportation system.

Global carriers will be the reality and the once shining star of the world's airline network (U.S. airlines) will be erased.
Very interesting perspective. While I think it may be a bit radical and extreme, it is a very sobering way of viewing the industry as a whole. Very well put!
RJtrashPilot is offline  
Old 05-27-2008, 08:41 AM
  #104  
Gets Weekends Off
 
IADBLRJ41's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2008
Position: 756 FO
Posts: 319
Default

Didn't UAL exit plan from CHP 11 include $55 oil? I kinda remember that but they were able to post a profit with oil much higher.

I think UAL will have some bumpy days ahead with the cost of oil but what airline does not have its challenge. Something has got to give in order for this whole industry to make it through.

My money is on UAL to pull through somehow.
IADBLRJ41 is offline  
Old 05-27-2008, 08:41 AM
  #105  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 62
Default

DAL4EVER has a good point but I doubt it will be the European carriers s/he mentioned. AF has lost a lot of money on this year's 1st quarter cting high fuel price as the chief reason. LH and BA are still profitable but won't be at 150$/bbl.
Sadly the Middle Eaestern carriers don't have to worry about the price of fuel. Some Asian ones have so much cash on hand that they will be well positioned to buy a failing US major or take over its route system or part of it.
Unless things change, within the next 2 years I can see Singapore Airlines with a major hub in IAD and Emirates or Etihad with one in MSP.
Just my 2 cents.

Last edited by There is line; 05-27-2008 at 08:47 AM.
There is line is offline  
Old 05-27-2008, 08:44 AM
  #106  
I have shiny jet syndrome
 
RJtrashPilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: ELACS, FACs and SECs. Who doesn't love 'em?
Posts: 984
Default

Originally Posted by There is line
DAL4EVER has a good point but I doubt it will be the European carriers s/he mentioned. AF has lost a lot of money on this year's 1st quarter and LH and BA are still profitable but won't be at 150$/bbl.
Sadly the Middle Eaestern carriers don't have to worry about the price of fuel. Some Asian ones have so much cash on hand that they will be well positioned to buy a failing US major or thake over its route system or part of it.
Unless things change within the next 2 years I can see Singapore Airlines with a major hub in IAD and Emirates or Etihad with one in MSP.
Just my 2 cents.

That's an interesting thought. Just curious, why do you say MSP of all places?
RJtrashPilot is offline  
Old 05-27-2008, 09:00 AM
  #107  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 62
Default

I think UAL and NWA are the 2 domestic airlines that are both financially vulnerable and have an attractive route system.
There is line is offline  
Old 05-27-2008, 09:40 AM
  #108  
Gets Weekends Off
 
newKnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 765-A
Posts: 6,844
Default

Originally Posted by There is line
I think UAL and NWA are the 2 domestic airlines that are both financially vulnerable and have an attractive route system.
Why do you think that? Please. Details.
newKnow is offline  
Old 05-27-2008, 12:28 PM
  #109  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 55
Default

I read an article a few years back and two things always stuck out at me. #1 airlines have an unusually high barrier to exit. #2 Everbody makes money off the airline except for the airline i.e. labor, creditors, management etc...

IMO, airlines have become such a part of the national economy that we cannot really afford for one that size to fail. Furlough, downsize, pay cuts, mergers...yes. Liquidation unlikely. We cant even strike anymore! Liquidation, I think not.

And with a bunch of democrats and the possibility of a chicago politician as POTUS. United maybe the place to be!
Young Jack is offline  
Old 05-27-2008, 12:46 PM
  #110  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 744 CA
Posts: 4,772
Default

now that is an interesting thought....... they wont let a pilot group strike because of the disruption to the national economy.... will they let someone like UAL or USAIR go under ..... and even worse effect....... interesting.
HercDriver130 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
palgia841
Major
9
12-07-2007 08:11 PM
Low & Slow
Major
37
08-23-2007 06:07 PM
LAfrequentflyer
Hangar Talk
2
02-01-2006 06:39 AM
HSLD
Major
14
01-30-2006 02:08 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
08-25-2005 10:11 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices