BA 777 Accident
04-13-2008, 01:57 PM
#1
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 609
BA 777 Accident
anybody else hear something about this????????????
>> Subject: [NBAA-pilots] British Airways 777
>>
>>
>> QBer's-
>>
>> This was sent to me with little background other than the below text, but
>> it appears that maybe
>>
>> the lower half text came from a NBAA discussion forum.
>>
>> If any of you corporate guys have access to NBAA "airmail", maybe you can
>> confirm.
>>
>>
>>
>> Gary J
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> See the article below.
>>
>>
>>
>> Time to rethink "fly by wire" technology. This would never have happened
>> in a Hawker. But you would have had to hand fly the Hawker after the GS
>> pitch up that would have occurred.
>>
>>
>>
>> It seems to me that we have more to worry about with increased aircraft
>> automation and daily worsening of normal radio interference plus the very
>> likely possibility that the bad guys will start using this vulnerability
>> against us when they figure out how easy it is to disrupt or bring down a
>> modern aircraft.
>>
>>
>>
>> Guess I'm about ready to go back to a twin Beech with coffee grinder
>> radios....naaaa
>>
>>
>>
>> JC
>>
>>
>>
>> p.s. The main reason the Russians stayed with vacuum tube technology long
>> after the rest of the world went with integrated circuitry is that the old
>> technology is so much more resistant to RMI (radio magnetic interference)
>> from virtually any source including nuclear EMI (electro magnetic
>> interference).
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> An unidentified source sent this concerning the Boeing 777 that crashed
>> short of the runway in London a few weeks ago.
>>
>> Well, the British aircraft accident investigation board has finally come
>> around to the conclusion that the event was RF-induced.
>>
>> Prime Minister Dr. Gordon Brown's motorcade was passing under the approach
>> path of BA038. His security system utilised a RF transmitter to block out
>> any cell-phone triggered devices. Apparently this system has a two mile
>> range, and it caused the Boeing 777 EEC's (electronic engine controls) to
>> sense a "overboost" situation, thereby commanding a reduced-thrust
>> situation for the engines, simultaneously. Most interesting.
>>
>> We'll see how Boeing and the BAA handle this one. This could be
>> potentially bad, in view of the simplicity of technology that the bad guys
>> could use to bring down an airliner.
>>
>> For more information about Air Mail, or to unsubscribe from this list,
>> please visit http://www.nbaa.org/airmail
>>
>
>
>> Subject: [NBAA-pilots] British Airways 777
>>
>>
>> QBer's-
>>
>> This was sent to me with little background other than the below text, but
>> it appears that maybe
>>
>> the lower half text came from a NBAA discussion forum.
>>
>> If any of you corporate guys have access to NBAA "airmail", maybe you can
>> confirm.
>>
>>
>>
>> Gary J
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> See the article below.
>>
>>
>>
>> Time to rethink "fly by wire" technology. This would never have happened
>> in a Hawker. But you would have had to hand fly the Hawker after the GS
>> pitch up that would have occurred.
>>
>>
>>
>> It seems to me that we have more to worry about with increased aircraft
>> automation and daily worsening of normal radio interference plus the very
>> likely possibility that the bad guys will start using this vulnerability
>> against us when they figure out how easy it is to disrupt or bring down a
>> modern aircraft.
>>
>>
>>
>> Guess I'm about ready to go back to a twin Beech with coffee grinder
>> radios....naaaa
>>
>>
>>
>> JC
>>
>>
>>
>> p.s. The main reason the Russians stayed with vacuum tube technology long
>> after the rest of the world went with integrated circuitry is that the old
>> technology is so much more resistant to RMI (radio magnetic interference)
>> from virtually any source including nuclear EMI (electro magnetic
>> interference).
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> An unidentified source sent this concerning the Boeing 777 that crashed
>> short of the runway in London a few weeks ago.
>>
>> Well, the British aircraft accident investigation board has finally come
>> around to the conclusion that the event was RF-induced.
>>
>> Prime Minister Dr. Gordon Brown's motorcade was passing under the approach
>> path of BA038. His security system utilised a RF transmitter to block out
>> any cell-phone triggered devices. Apparently this system has a two mile
>> range, and it caused the Boeing 777 EEC's (electronic engine controls) to
>> sense a "overboost" situation, thereby commanding a reduced-thrust
>> situation for the engines, simultaneously. Most interesting.
>>
>> We'll see how Boeing and the BAA handle this one. This could be
>> potentially bad, in view of the simplicity of technology that the bad guys
>> could use to bring down an airliner.
>>
>> For more information about Air Mail, or to unsubscribe from this list,
>> please visit http://www.nbaa.org/airmail
>>
>
>
04-13-2008, 02:23 PM
#2
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Posts: 5,726
Yeah and bigfoot was in the aft lav fighting with Elvis which caused the nose to pitch up which caused a nest of gremlins to come to life and they shut both engines off.
You are not actually taking this serious are you?
You are not actually taking this serious are you?
04-13-2008, 02:27 PM
#3
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: 7ER B...whatever that means.
Posts: 3,982
anybody else hear something about this????????????
>> An unidentified source sent this concerning the Boeing 777 that crashed
>> short of the runway in London a few weeks ago.
>>
>> Well, the British aircraft accident investigation board has finally come
>> around to the conclusion that the event was RF-induced.
>>
>> Prime Minister Dr. Gordon Brown's motorcade was passing under the approach
>> path of BA038. His security system utilised a RF transmitter to block out
>> any cell-phone triggered devices. Apparently this system has a two mile
>> range, and it caused the Boeing 777 EEC's (electronic engine controls) to
>> sense a "overboost" situation, thereby commanding a reduced-thrust
>> situation for the engines, simultaneously. Most interesting.
>>
>> We'll see how Boeing and the BAA handle this one. This could be
>> potentially bad, in view of the simplicity of technology that the bad guys
>> could use to bring down an airliner.
>>
>> For more information about Air Mail, or to unsubscribe from this list,
>> please visit
>> An unidentified source sent this concerning the Boeing 777 that crashed
>> short of the runway in London a few weeks ago.
>>
>> Well, the British aircraft accident investigation board has finally come
>> around to the conclusion that the event was RF-induced.
>>
>> Prime Minister Dr. Gordon Brown's motorcade was passing under the approach
>> path of BA038. His security system utilised a RF transmitter to block out
>> any cell-phone triggered devices. Apparently this system has a two mile
>> range, and it caused the Boeing 777 EEC's (electronic engine controls) to
>> sense a "overboost" situation, thereby commanding a reduced-thrust
>> situation for the engines, simultaneously. Most interesting.
>>
>> We'll see how Boeing and the BAA handle this one. This could be
>> potentially bad, in view of the simplicity of technology that the bad guys
>> could use to bring down an airliner.
>>
>> For more information about Air Mail, or to unsubscribe from this list,
>> please visit
04-13-2008, 02:31 PM
#4
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: Admiral's club lounge
Posts: 631
04-13-2008, 03:00 PM
#5
Day puke
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Out.
Posts: 3,865
EMI issues have been tossed around before. There are some folks who believe TWA 800's explosion was triggered by EMI.
http://cryptome.org/twa800-emi.htm
One thing is sure: EMI doesn't affect cables and hydraulics
http://cryptome.org/twa800-emi.htm
One thing is sure: EMI doesn't affect cables and hydraulics
04-13-2008, 03:02 PM
#6
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Jump
Posts: 276
Totally fake email, sent to scare unsuspecting people.
http://www.hoax-slayer.com/heathrow-777-crash.shtml
Just like the chemtrail conspiracy story from years ago...totally fake, yet thousands of gullible people still believe this nonsense.
http://www.anomalies-unlimited.com/C...Witness_1.html
http://www.hoax-slayer.com/heathrow-777-crash.shtml
Just like the chemtrail conspiracy story from years ago...totally fake, yet thousands of gullible people still believe this nonsense.
http://www.anomalies-unlimited.com/C...Witness_1.html
04-13-2008, 03:35 PM
#8
Banned
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Old Fart
Posts: 74
04-13-2008, 06:16 PM
#9
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 218
For what it's worth I had a BA 777 Capt'n jumping on us and told us that they have found the cause of the problem. I only caught some of what he was saying but something about the fuel being at -77C in cruise. Like I said I did not hear the whole story but that was the jist of it.
04-14-2008, 05:58 AM
#10
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: Admiral's club lounge
Posts: 631
For what it's worth I had a BA 777 Capt'n jumping on us and told us that they have found the cause of the problem. I only caught some of what he was saying but something about the fuel being at -77C in cruise. Like I said I did not hear the whole story but that was the jist of it.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bgmann
Foreign
25
01-30-2008 11:26 AM
