Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Is there a safe future for Pilots? My Son's Question >

Is there a safe future for Pilots? My Son's Question

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Is there a safe future for Pilots? My Son's Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-08-2007, 09:22 AM
  #71  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
KW10001's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 58
Default

Here, i need to leave here in a minute, got a flight out of midway here, i love this run....

Anyways, i dont have much time, but thank you guys for all your invaluable advice, ive got some other lefties that i work with who went through the Service, so ill have a go with them, appreicate it guys..... See You All In Oakland

Tim
KW10001 is offline  
Old 10-08-2007, 09:55 AM
  #72  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: undefined
Posts: 328
Default

Originally Posted by RobLAX
Are the low-time pilots of today any more dangerous than the low-time pilots of the 60s and 70s at the majors?

YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I think it hysterical and Ironic that the guy raising the safety flag has an avatar of a guy holding onto his parachute with one hand in freefall!
pilotc90a is offline  
Old 10-08-2007, 11:55 AM
  #73  
Gets Weekends Off
 
The Chow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 1st year pay for the 3rd time
Posts: 1,434
Default

Originally Posted by KW10001
328Dude, ill see you there, save me a cold one

Huggy Bear, YES!!! that was my point. I am not worried about safety, because even though we see younger and younger kids taking to the skies, the market will adapt after the first 3 crashes and it will all work out. However, you brought up the point i was worried about, because when SWA's "Fuel Hedging" deal times out, SWA will be at a level playing field with all the other currier's, and all of us pilots will have the self security of our jobs snatched from under us. Its apparent to me at least, that the security of all our jobs are obscured by a dark cloud, that i hope, my son will be able to navigate through to find financial security. Just hope he can fill that void with something else if the airline industry cuts large amounts of workers off the payroll. Just want whats best for him.....

So, what do you guys think, he is 15 now, he is a sophomore, hes getting A's and B's, should i wait it out until i fully endorse his pilot dreams? or do you guys think it is safe enough right now for him to start looking to the future as being a pilot. I asked him last night that if he was offered a job as a C210 pilot, would he like to take it? He told me as long as he gets to fly and gets a steady income. Needless to say it was good to hear, given the unfortunate circumstances.

Oh well, ill stop yapping and let you guys answer. Im Back on shift tomorrow morning

Boy, i need to make my own account


Take it for what its worth...I came into the game late but I always wanted to fly. One day I took the plunge. Don't have your son waste time that should be used to getting him towards his dream. I wish I hadn't. But it is also great advice to make sure you have a fallback plan.

FWIW

The Chow
The Chow is offline  
Old 10-08-2007, 03:13 PM
  #74  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
KW10001's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 58
Default

Ahh, welcome to Oakland

Well, along with loving his Flight Simulator, he loves computers, and PC Games, now i told him to go ahead and get a degree in what you love other than Aviation so hes basically decided something in computers. I think that is a fairly good fallback given that Computers do not have an deadly spot like the aviation industry (oil, terrorism, etc)....

Ok,I have another Question for you guys. As im sure we all believe, the airline industry will never end, just because of the "I need to get there, and i need to get there fast!" type people i see every Monday with the briefcases. One of the things ive always thought, was we would absolutely find a alternative source of energy to power our jets too keep the industry going because it has to. Do you guys think that is relatively accurate? Just want your opinion on that...

See you guys tomorrow morning...

Tim
KW10001 is offline  
Old 10-08-2007, 04:11 PM
  #75  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,050
Default

Originally Posted by KW10001
Ok,I have another Question for you guys. As im sure we all believe, the airline industry will never end, just because of the "I need to get there, and i need to get there fast!" type people i see every Monday with the briefcases. One of the things ive always thought, was we would absolutely find a alternative source of energy to power our jets too keep the industry going because it has to. Do you guys think that is relatively accurate? Just want your opinion on that...

See you guys tomorrow morning...

Tim
I'm sure we will eventually. Unfortunately, Kerosene has almost all the perfect properties for powering turbine aircraft...

High energy density.
Good specific volume.
Low volatility.
Relatively low flamability (compared to other high-energy fuels like gasoline and Hydrogen).
Non-corrosive.
Stable between 100 C and - 40 C.
Easy to handle and transport.
Infrastructure already exists.

The only thing is doesn't have going for it is low emissions, although engine design changes can make some headway here.

Long term, we may be able to use kerosene created by artificial means (the Air Force is testing this on various aircraft with good results so far). The big issue here is emissions...any fuel that is similar enough to kerosene to work in existing aircraft will probably be chemically close enough to produce similar pollution levels...not good.

If environmental concerns force us to use some other fuel it may well necessitate a drastic redesign of our airliners, and the performance cost may severly limit range. Hydrogen is the only thing that comes even close, but it has numerous disadavantages...low specific volume, extremely volatile and corrosive, explosive, cryogenic storage and handling. NASA used kerosene to power the the Saturn V moon rocket because hydrogen was too dangerous to deal with! Obviously they forget this when they designed the shuttle...think Challenger and Hindenberg
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 10-08-2007, 04:15 PM
  #76  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 584
Default

I've heard about a cheap, lower emission jet fuel made from COAL that the USAF was testing.
MikeB525 is offline  
Old 10-08-2007, 04:58 PM
  #77  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
KW10001's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 58
Default

i also heard NASA was testing a highly volatile material. its made of small metal shavings, that are "Sprinkled" into the engine, kinda like how an S.O.S. pad can be used to light fires in survival situations... well, these shaving's, once lit, transfer energy easily because of how they are condensed together.... oh well, just something i heard...

Tim
KW10001 is offline  
Old 10-08-2007, 06:17 PM
  #78  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,050
Default

Originally Posted by KW10001
i also heard NASA was testing a highly volatile material. its made of small metal shavings, that are "Sprinkled" into the engine, kinda like how an S.O.S. pad can be used to light fires in survival situations... well, these shaving's, once lit, transfer energy easily because of how they are condensed together.... oh well, just something i heard...

Tim
Some of the earliest combustion engines used powered solids (often coal dust) as a fuel. But I'm not sure what sort of emissions you'd get from burning metal.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 10-08-2007, 06:24 PM
  #79  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,050
Default

Originally Posted by MikeB525
I've heard about a cheap, lower emission jet fuel made from COAL that the USAF was testing.
It's been tested (50/50 mix with military Jet A) on a B-52, worked fine. They are moving on to other aircraft for more testing. The COS of the AF appears quite serious about achieving a massive reduction in petroleum dependence in the near future. Presumably the other services will follow right along.

However, the emissions reduction will be minor...the fuel produced is chemically similar to kersosene, but probably with fewer contaminants. This project is about ensuring fuel for the military in the event of an embargo. The US has VAST coal reserves...if we can just use it cleanly.

At this point the stuff is pretty expensive, the process requires a lot of energy in addition to the coal.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 10-10-2007, 02:52 AM
  #80  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
KW10001's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 58
Default

Ok Guys.... looks like this post has gone the way of the dodo, so i will review all the great informationa i got from my fellow pilot, and print out what i feel is important....

Thanks Again

See you in the Skies
KW10001 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices