Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Is there a safe future for Pilots? My Son's Question >

Is there a safe future for Pilots? My Son's Question

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Is there a safe future for Pilots? My Son's Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-06-2007, 04:20 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 116
Default

Originally Posted by seaav8tor
There should be doubt the Next Gen ATC system will be designed with commercial UAVs in mind. Perhaps not totally replacing a human monitor on passenger flights for 20-30 years, but cargo perhaps in 10-15.


Isn't that what we're doing now in a sense? I still find it rewarding. The regulatory environment we operate in will only get more complex as airspace gets more congested and fuel saving programs become more and more serious within our respective SOPs. Pilots also have the ability to "keep the operation moving" and make discretionary calls that no computer can.

I have no doubt that we have the technology NOW to make unmanned platforms. However, there is still some grace to flying and I believe there will continue to be. Although there's a lot less stick-and-rudder these days, there is satisfaction to be gained from thoroughly knowing a complex avionics suite (and all its idiosyncrasies) and being free from the "clerical" aspects of flight. Give me all the automation I can have so I can focus on decision-making.

From the guys I know flying the UAS platforms, it seems like a fairly interesting job as well, and one that requires aviators no less. If one entering the field keeps an open mind, there are many opportunities in aviation for years to come.

Heck, the DOD just requested RFPS for a next-generation MANNED bomber platform.

Also, no civil jury will accept "we did everything we could" after an unmanned airliner crashes for any reason.

Just adding my commentary - I appreciate your thoughts as well!
N5139 is offline  
Old 10-06-2007, 04:30 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Pilotpip's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2005
Position: Retired
Posts: 2,934
Default

Advice for him? Depending on if he's old enough, tell him to get a job!

Seriously, I had no family in the industry and didn't know much about it until I started flying. Getting a job at an FBO was the best thing I did. I spent hours yacking with mechanics and looking around open engine cowls, talking to pilots about how they got where they are, getting advice for how to fly. Lots of experience and mistakes to avoid, and a ton of business cards on my desk with the promise of "give me a call when you get xxxx hours". Worst case, you get to know some people who own planes and go for a ride once in a while.
Pilotpip is offline  
Old 10-06-2007, 05:35 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
328dude's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: SWA/FO
Posts: 309
Default

Tim,or whatever your name is:

Are you worried about the industry as a whole and finding work as a pilot, or following in your footsteps and following you at Southwest as many legacy's have done here.

Maybe post this on the SWAPA site. Might get additional info, but your real identity will be displayed if your trying to protect that which I don't blame you.
328dude is offline  
Old 10-06-2007, 05:37 PM
  #14  
Line Holder
 
RobLAX's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 81
Default

[quote=Pilotpip;243295]
Originally Posted by RobLAX

The accident rates would show quite contrary.

Didn't know accident rates showed experience and flight times! Lol. Can we say oooops!!! So unless you have done a study, I will take personal experience over what you think and say YES to your original question.

Additionally, you seem to forget planes today are much more reliable compared to the 60's and 70's. You put a current low time guy in the planes flown in the 60's (oh and include the pilot training back then) and your rates would go off the chart!!!

Last edited by RobLAX; 10-06-2007 at 05:50 PM.
RobLAX is offline  
Old 10-06-2007, 05:41 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 744 CA
Posts: 4,772
Default

FWIW....i wouldnt exactly consider pilots flying 50-80,000 pound jets ...commuter pilots....
HercDriver130 is offline  
Old 10-06-2007, 05:51 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Pilotpip's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2005
Position: Retired
Posts: 2,934
Default

[QUOTE=RobLAX;243334]
Originally Posted by Pilotpip


Didn't know accident rates showed experience and flight times! Lol. Can we say oooops!!! So unless you have done a study, I will take personal experience over what you think and say YES to your original question.
You're right, they don't take experience into consideration. Regardless, the airlines are far safer today than they were 30 years ago. At that time, United and others were hiring people with zero experience and throwing them in the right seat as soon as they got a commercial. Last time I checked, regionals aren't falling out of the sky.

What about companies still flying 727s and 135 operators using old Lears, Convairs and other aircraft from that generation? Their accident rates are lower today despite using this "less reliable" technology too.
Pilotpip is offline  
Old 10-06-2007, 05:55 PM
  #17  
Line Holder
 
RobLAX's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 81
Default

Never said they were. Read what I wrote. If you think a guy moving into a CA jet position after 9 months if safe, your crazy. Odds my son, odds.
RobLAX is offline  
Old 10-06-2007, 05:57 PM
  #18  
Line Holder
 
RobLAX's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 81
Default

Originally Posted by HercDriver130
FWIW....i wouldnt exactly consider pilots flying 50-80,000 pound jets ...commuter pilots....

Weight does not give you experience my friend. Sorry to burst your bubble.
RobLAX is offline  
Old 10-06-2007, 05:59 PM
  #19  
Line Holder
 
RobLAX's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 81
Default

[quote=Pilotpip;243340]
Originally Posted by RobLAX

What about companies still flying 727s and 135 operators using old Lears, Convairs and other aircraft from that generation? Their accident rates are lower today despite using this "less reliable" technology too.
Is pilot training the same as it was in the 60's? Don't think so. You are reaching bubba but your arms are not long enough.
RobLAX is offline  
Old 10-06-2007, 06:08 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Pilotpip's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2005
Position: Retired
Posts: 2,934
Default

It's very different, and there's a reason for that. Safety. Low timers weren't the ones causing accidents back in the day anyway. CRM was non-existient. F/Os were largely told not to touch anything unless told to do so. God forbid you question what was going on.

Please tell me long-armed one, where all these aircraft piloted by nine month captains are and where they're falling out of the sky.
Pilotpip is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices