Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
KCM/Random Screening Stats >

KCM/Random Screening Stats

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

KCM/Random Screening Stats

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-16-2024, 03:44 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,606
Default

Originally Posted by TiredSoul
Bringing up exceptional individuals doesn’t change the fact that in the big scheme of things those numbers are statistically insignificant and in themselves do not warrant KCM access.
With flight crew it’s at least 30%, not 0.03%
Pilots are no more deserving of KCM access than FAs. There are PLENTY of unstable pilots.
​​​​​​


​​​​​​
CBreezy is offline  
Old 04-16-2024, 04:34 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Big E 757's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: A320 Left seat
Posts: 2,594
Default

Originally Posted by TiredSoul
My personal experience is 50/50…it’s really like flipping a coin.
KCM should be pilots only…sorry not sorry.
We get the most stringent background checks, half of us are former military or active ANG.
FA’s…meh not so much.
My biggest argument is that we've all worked too hard and have way more to lose than a new hire FA, to mess around breaking the rules at KCM, but then one pilot gets caught with a weapon in his bag. (Or so the TSA says), so my argument blows up in my face.
Big E 757 is offline  
Old 04-16-2024, 04:49 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
QRH Bingo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2021
Position: We Need To Talk About Your Flare
Posts: 631
Default

Originally Posted by RAH RAH REE
Has anyone found or heard of any stats related to the KCM random screenings? i.e. number of randoms per approvals, amount of unallowed items found on random screenings, Pilot vs. FA stats?
Official stats would be nice to obtain but I wouldn't hold my breath waiting. I kept my own personal stats for a year and found I was selected for random screening at a rate of 34%. Months varried from 17% up to 55% with zero unallowed items, of course.
QRH Bingo is offline  
Old 04-16-2024, 07:33 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
Default

Originally Posted by QRH Bingo
Official stats would be nice to obtain but I wouldn't hold my breath waiting. I kept my own personal stats for a year and found I was selected for random screening at a rate of 34%. Months varried from 17% up to 55% with zero unallowed items, of course.
Interesting stats.

I'm convinced that things went downhill for me back when a screener found a bottle of water in my bag when I got secondaried out of uniform. /s

Seriously though, I trace the large increase in randoms to when a fellow United pilot brought a weapon down to Australia. It's my understanding that he found it in his bag down there and opted to bring it back to the US through security rather than dispose of it there. I don't know his fate, but one can only hope that he's doing hard time down under. Their weapons laws are very strict.
Andy is offline  
Old 04-17-2024, 07:07 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekend Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,792
Default

Plenty of FA's at SWA who are former military... and they are some of the easiest FA's to work with and yes, both male and female.

My bigger beef is with TSA themselves. I spoke with one of their supervisors after my entire crew got randomed because not once have I seen a TSA agent get randomly screened. Not once.

After talking with the supervisor, I am far more worried about TSA agents being potential bad players and security risk than flight crew... pilot or FA. That's why this whole KCM charade is just that.... a charade.
RJSAviator76 is offline  
Old 04-17-2024, 07:30 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2022
Posts: 699
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
Really? Post some actual data, please.
I don't believe I've ever met an FA who said they're former military.
And some also work for 3 letter agencies???? Which 3 letter agencies are those? Is the 3 letter agency job their side hustle?
A pilot threatening to shoot his captain as a carrying FFDO or another pilot in the jumpseat trying to shut down the engines mid flight are bigger threats than a FA can ever impose. I’m more worried about a weirdo pilot than a GGG FA for security reasons
170Till5 is offline  
Old 04-17-2024, 09:57 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,782
Default

Originally Posted by RJSAviator76
Plenty of FA's at SWA who are former military... and they are some of the easiest FA's to work with and yes, both male and female.

My bigger beef is with TSA themselves. I spoke with one of their supervisors after my entire crew got randomed because not once have I seen a TSA agent get randomly screened. Not once.

After talking with the supervisor, I am far more worried about TSA agents being potential bad players and security risk than flight crew... pilot or FA. That's why this whole KCM charade is just that.... a charade.
Never mind ground/SIDA badged employees.

When do they start giving them random?
John Carr is offline  
Old 04-17-2024, 10:27 AM
  #28  
Moderator
 
FangsF15's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,971
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy
Pilots are no more deserving of KCM access than FAs. There are PLENTY of unstable pilots.
​​​​​​


​​​​​​
What does being "unstable" have to do with what you might be found carrying through KCM? That seems like a different issue altogether.

I'd be very interested to see the breakout of 'violations' by Pilots and FA's, with their severity. While it's easy to think FA's should be in a different KCM risk pool than pilots, I'm not if the data supports that, or not... I suspect we might not like the answer.
FangsF15 is offline  
Old 04-18-2024, 03:33 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,382
Default

Originally Posted by FangsF15
What does being "unstable" have to do with what you might be found carrying through KCM? That seems like a different issue altogether.

I'd be very interested to see the breakout of 'violations' by Pilots and FA's, with their severity. While it's easy to think FA's should be in a different KCM risk pool than pilots, I'm not if the data supports that, or not... I suspect we might not like the answer.
the data is crucial to the argument. The Big 3 alone have over 50,000 pilots. If four guys got caught with [whatever] I would argue that it does not justify a pilot-wide 50%+ “random” selection rate for, what, the last several years now? (I think it has really gotten bad within the past couple years).

instead, it just seems punitive and deliberate harassment.
JTwift is offline  
Old 04-18-2024, 05:48 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2021
Posts: 466
Default

Originally Posted by TiredSoul
My personal experience is 50/50…it’s really like flipping a coin.
KCM should be pilots only…sorry not sorry.
We get the most stringent background checks, half of us are former military or active ANG.
FA’s…meh not so much.
terrible idea
golfandflows is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Boatbuilder
Delta
83
01-24-2023 09:50 AM
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
WatchThis!
Union Talk
11
11-15-2010 04:50 AM
applying
Foreign
7
10-05-2010 09:14 PM
vagabond
Cargo
49
10-15-2009 04:03 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices