FAA unlikely to raise age 65
#61
#62
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2021
Posts: 339
Exactly, stop living vicariously through your job. Find a hobby (mind numbingly boring GA flying is not a hobby).
#63
This is definitely not a healthy occupation.
https://www.airlive.net/retired-pilo...he-population/
“60% of 282 retired airline pilots included in a recent study died within five years of leaving their jobs, according to an international pilots organization.”
https://www.airlive.net/retired-pilo...he-population/
#64
#65
Although SW doesn't fly redeyes, and the vast majority of the route structure covers only 4 time zones, they have been adding more and more flying to the "shoulders". It's not unusual for east coast push times around 5am local. For someone with a west coast domicile, that could mean a midnight wake up for a 2am push according to their body. Same on the other side of the clock with west coast arrivals at midnight or 1am - 3 or 4am for an east coast pilot.
While it lacks the true round the clock nature of global flying and pure redeyes, I think it is probably nearly as exhausting with similar health consequences.
#66
This is definitely not a healthy occupation.
https://www.airlive.net/retired-pilo...he-population/
“60% of 282 retired airline pilots included in a recent study died within five years of leaving their jobs, according to an international pilots organization.”
https://www.airlive.net/retired-pilo...he-population/
#67
Consider the source
This is definitely not a healthy occupation.
https://www.airlive.net/retired-pilo...he-population/
“60% of 282 retired airline pilots included in a recent study died within five years of leaving their jobs, according to an international pilots organization.”
https://www.airlive.net/retired-pilo...he-population/
pilots from Argentina, England and Canada, from 1953- to 1988! Not so relevant to modern first world pilots who’ve had a lifetime of healthy living with access to first world health care.
Mostly everybody smoked in 1953 and the no smoking rule on flights had not been commenced in 1988.
So called study was sponsored by a European Labor organization, not a medical society.
I always am cynical when I read such cherry picked statistics put out by a lobbying group. Who does a study of Canadian, Argentinian, and British airline pilots only?
My dad, would have been included in this age demographic. He retired from airlines in 1985, and passed away at 86 years old.
#68
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
I couldn't get the original link to work. This one did: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/60-28...ied-john-hoyte
Note that he's comparing current life expectancy against 40+ year old data. Life expectancy 40 years ago was less than today.
There's really nothing scientific about using such stale data.
Note that he's comparing current life expectancy against 40+ year old data. Life expectancy 40 years ago was less than today.
There's really nothing scientific about using such stale data.
#69
I couldn't get the original link to work. This one did: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/60-28...ied-john-hoyte
Note that he's comparing current life expectancy against 40+ year old data. Life expectancy 40 years ago was less than today.
There's really nothing scientific about using such stale data.
Note that he's comparing current life expectancy against 40+ year old data. Life expectancy 40 years ago was less than today.
There's really nothing scientific about using such stale data.
#70
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: A330 FO
Posts: 275
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post