FAA unlikely to raise age 65
#143
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,785
if I were to agree with your premise there still needs to be close to a replacement level of children to prevent a demographic crisis. Plus I think any retirement concept independent of economic model ultimately needs children.
I agree that there’s too many of us but there doesn’t seem to be any easy solution or really any that doesn’t involve a fundamental shift in standard of living.
Also the people that are aware and concerned about this problem tend to not have children so there’s another barrier to carrying on the cause. Not too many Shakers running around…
I agree that there’s too many of us but there doesn’t seem to be any easy solution or really any that doesn’t involve a fundamental shift in standard of living.
Also the people that are aware and concerned about this problem tend to not have children so there’s another barrier to carrying on the cause. Not too many Shakers running around…
#145
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 525
I don’t think that’s the only problem with a demographic crisis, though. If the majority of the population is aged, how many can really retire? Obviously more can retire if you accept lower economic output/growth but there still needs to be enough economic activity to allow a larger portion of the population to retire
#146
It's not a "goal". It is however a fairly immutable aspect of the human condition.
Also too little economic growth leads to all kinds of problems as populations increase... poor living conditions and economic prospects are a fertile field for all manner of misery and violence.
Probably the best thing is to elevate everybody to first world standards... we have enough technology (assuming political will) to provide for everybody, save the planet, and grow sustainably. You just need educated, enlightened people who live in a just culture where you can trust people who aren't your immediate family/clan. Added bonus... the most developed societies tend to have lower birth rates, even negative over the long haul.
I don't think we need a pyramid scheme to care for the elderly (they did pre-industrial age), but probably close to one-for-one replacement.
#147
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,785
Also too little economic growth leads to all kinds of problems as populations increase... poor living conditions and economic prospects are a fertile field for all manner of misery and violence.
Probably the best thing is to elevate everybody to first world standards... we have enough technology (assuming political will) to provide for everybody, save the planet, and grow sustainably. You just need educated, enlightened people who live in a just culture where you can trust people who aren't your immediate family/clan. Added bonus... the most developed societies tend to have lower birth rates, even negative over the long haul.
#148
2. Everything would be perfect if only if only if only somebody was in charge and had the power to make everybody do the right thing. Unfortunately it takes a lot of power to overcome human nature, and power corrupts... leading inevitably to tryanny and industrial-scale mass murder. As we've demonstrated empirically on multiple occasions.
300 years ago, sure. Today, one worker's output can be amplified by automation and technology... you just need societies which are capable of building or at least employing sophisticated technology. You don't even need to be sophisticated enough to develop the tech, there are already societies doing that.
#149
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,785
1. Human nature.
2. Everything would be perfect if only if only if only somebody was in charge and had the power to make everybody do the right thing. Unfortunately it takes a lot of power to overcome human nature, and power corrupts... leading inevitably to tryanny and industrial-scale mass murder. As we've demonstrated empirically on multiple occasions.
300 years ago, sure. Today, one worker's output can be amplified by automation and technology... you just need societies which are capable of building or at least employing sophisticated technology. You don't even need to be sophisticated enough to develop the tech, there are already societies doing that.
2. Everything would be perfect if only if only if only somebody was in charge and had the power to make everybody do the right thing. Unfortunately it takes a lot of power to overcome human nature, and power corrupts... leading inevitably to tryanny and industrial-scale mass murder. As we've demonstrated empirically on multiple occasions.
300 years ago, sure. Today, one worker's output can be amplified by automation and technology... you just need societies which are capable of building or at least employing sophisticated technology. You don't even need to be sophisticated enough to develop the tech, there are already societies doing that.
and wealth disparity in first world countries is increasing, meaning the exploitation isn’t getting better, but we are onshoring it as we run out of places to exploit
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post