Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
FAA unlikely to raise age 65 >

FAA unlikely to raise age 65

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

FAA unlikely to raise age 65

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-29-2022, 10:53 PM
  #141  
Strike averted!
 
at6d's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: B737
Posts: 3,800
Default

The population growth in this country is not from children being born. It’s from immigrants coming here.
at6d is offline  
Old 07-29-2022, 11:39 PM
  #142  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PineappleXpres's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2022
Posts: 1,209
Default

An aging population gives you a labor shortage to include hospital capacity limitations. How’s that been going?
PineappleXpres is online now  
Old 07-30-2022, 05:45 AM
  #143  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,785
Default

Originally Posted by Jdub2
if I were to agree with your premise there still needs to be close to a replacement level of children to prevent a demographic crisis. Plus I think any retirement concept independent of economic model ultimately needs children.

I agree that there’s too many of us but there doesn’t seem to be any easy solution or really any that doesn’t involve a fundamental shift in standard of living.

Also the people that are aware and concerned about this problem tend to not have children so there’s another barrier to carrying on the cause. Not too many Shakers running around…
a demographic crisis is only a problem if you accept that economic growth is the goal, always and forever
OOfff is offline  
Old 07-30-2022, 05:47 AM
  #144  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,785
Default

Originally Posted by PineappleXpres
An aging population gives you a labor shortage to include hospital capacity limitations. How’s that been going?
welp, guess we better just grow the population forever instead
OOfff is offline  
Old 07-30-2022, 06:03 AM
  #145  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 525
Default

Originally Posted by OOfff
a demographic crisis is only a problem if you accept that economic growth is the goal, always and forever
I don’t think that’s the only problem with a demographic crisis, though. If the majority of the population is aged, how many can really retire? Obviously more can retire if you accept lower economic output/growth but there still needs to be enough economic activity to allow a larger portion of the population to retire
Jdub2 is offline  
Old 07-30-2022, 07:06 AM
  #146  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,211
Default

Originally Posted by OOfff
a demographic crisis is only a problem if you accept that economic growth is the goal, always and forever

It's not a "goal". It is however a fairly immutable aspect of the human condition.

Also too little economic growth leads to all kinds of problems as populations increase... poor living conditions and economic prospects are a fertile field for all manner of misery and violence.

Probably the best thing is to elevate everybody to first world standards... we have enough technology (assuming political will) to provide for everybody, save the planet, and grow sustainably. You just need educated, enlightened people who live in a just culture where you can trust people who aren't your immediate family/clan. Added bonus... the most developed societies tend to have lower birth rates, even negative over the long haul.

I don't think we need a pyramid scheme to care for the elderly (they did pre-industrial age), but probably close to one-for-one replacement.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 07-30-2022, 09:25 AM
  #147  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,785
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
It's not a "goal". It is however a fairly immutable aspect of the human condition.
it absolutely is the goal under consumption-driven capitalist systems.

Also too little economic growth leads to all kinds of problems as populations increase... poor living conditions and economic prospects are a fertile field for all manner of misery and violence.
again because consumption and hoarding is the goal.

Probably the best thing is to elevate everybody to first world standards... we have enough technology (assuming political will) to provide for everybody, save the planet, and grow sustainably. You just need educated, enlightened people who live in a just culture where you can trust people who aren't your immediate family/clan. Added bonus... the most developed societies tend to have lower birth rates, even negative over the long haul.
not possible. First world conditions rely upon extracting wealth from cheap labor
OOfff is offline  
Old 07-30-2022, 09:43 AM
  #148  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,211
Default

Originally Posted by OOfff
it absolutely is the goal under consumption-driven capitalist systems.

again because consumption and hoarding is the goal.
1. Human nature.

2. Everything would be perfect if only if only if only somebody was in charge and had the power to make everybody do the right thing. Unfortunately it takes a lot of power to overcome human nature, and power corrupts... leading inevitably to tryanny and industrial-scale mass murder. As we've demonstrated empirically on multiple occasions.

Originally Posted by OOfff
not possible. First world conditions rely upon extracting wealth from cheap labor
300 years ago, sure. Today, one worker's output can be amplified by automation and technology... you just need societies which are capable of building or at least employing sophisticated technology. You don't even need to be sophisticated enough to develop the tech, there are already societies doing that.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 07-30-2022, 09:46 AM
  #149  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,785
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
1. Human nature.

2. Everything would be perfect if only if only if only somebody was in charge and had the power to make everybody do the right thing. Unfortunately it takes a lot of power to overcome human nature, and power corrupts... leading inevitably to tryanny and industrial-scale mass murder. As we've demonstrated empirically on multiple occasions.



300 years ago, sure. Today, one worker's output can be amplified by automation and technology... you just need societies which are capable of building or at least employing sophisticated technology. You don't even need to be sophisticated enough to develop the tech, there are already societies doing that.
we have all this technology and still exploit labor in Latin America and Southeast Asia. Literally no first world country gets by WITHOUT that exploitation.

and wealth disparity in first world countries is increasing, meaning the exploitation isn’t getting better, but we are onshoring it as we run out of places to exploit
OOfff is offline  
Old 07-30-2022, 10:02 AM
  #150  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jul 2021
Posts: 68
Default

I dunno. Looking back at history, 65 is a pretty arbitrary age. Who cares if they make it 67. If you want to keep flying and pass your medical more power to you.
duck of death is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
OnTheKlacker
Major
208
09-09-2010 12:36 AM
eFDeeeX
Cargo
59
01-31-2008 01:30 PM
Brown
Major
115
12-27-2007 07:47 AM
pdo bump
Cargo
70
05-30-2007 06:01 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices