Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
APU fuel burn does not matter >

APU fuel burn does not matter

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

APU fuel burn does not matter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-16-2022, 07:27 AM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,721
Default

Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine
That's not why we want to shut down the engines right away. Rampers routinely forget to check if the beacon is off. They have hearing protection on and walk right up to the spinning engine with a cone that gets sucked in. Happens every couple of years. Only takes one of those events to undo years of your hard work of not starting the APU on taxi in.
where I work, we start the APU, then shut it down during the turn
OOfff is offline  
Old 03-16-2022, 07:48 AM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
2StgTurbine's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,333
Default

Originally Posted by Margaritaville
Also despite it being petty, Crandall was correct about the olives. $100,000 is $100,000.
Measuring with a micrometer and cutting with an axe. How many man-hours were spent researching the fuel savings of removing olives? How many meetings were spent discussing the rollout of that program? How many hours were spent recording the results? Then think about the opportunity cost of using all those employees to save $100,000. Were there other projects they could have been working on that could have saved even more?

Delta's May 2020 bid is a perfect example. On paper, that saved the company money by moving 1,000 more pilots to the 717 pay rates. Saved about $1.5 million a month on payroll. If that's the only thing you measure, then that was a very smart idea. Too bad the unintended consequences have cost Delta way more money than it saved. Wasting time on scaring pilots about APU burn gives our passengers a bad experience for minor fuel savings equivalent to a rounding error.

Here's an unintended consequence from one captain. He didn't like to start the APU until 10 min before push because according to him since he saved the company some fuel at the gate, he thought it was OK to fly at Mach 0.80 instead of 0.78.
2StgTurbine is offline  
Old 03-16-2022, 08:10 AM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2019
Posts: 144
Default

Originally Posted by Margaritaville
Again, that's myopic. If the ramp did their job and did a FOD check that shouldn't be a problem.

I mean in reality how often does something "go through the engine" running at the gate? It's an infinitely small problem in search of a solution.
Just because Spiritier doesn’t start the APU on taxi in (leave engine running until GPU is plugged in), doesn’t mean everyone else shouldn’t either.

We care about safety around the airplane over here and getting the engines secured efficiently after parking is high on the list. Plus an engine at idle
is burning WAY more fuel than an APU would burn running for the entire turn.
Foggles is offline  
Old 03-16-2022, 08:13 AM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2019
Posts: 144
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy
I've been here a good chunk of time and I've literally never waited for ground power to be plugged in before shutting down an engine. Every memo I've read, at least on my fleet, is to wait to turn on the APU until approaching the gate. I've never seen one that says to never start it at all.
That is Spiritier’s procedure, not ours. They leave one running and wait for ground power.
Foggles is offline  
Old 03-16-2022, 08:43 AM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,518
Default

Originally Posted by Foggles
That is Spiritier’s procedure, not ours. They leave one running and wait for ground power.
Gotcha. They also pushback without any wing walkers. Saw it in ATL the other day. That's a pretty big cost savings.
CBreezy is online now  
Old 03-16-2022, 08:55 AM
  #46  
It's 5 o'clock somewhere
 
Margaritaville's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2020
Posts: 2,151
Default

Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine
Measuring with a micrometer and cutting with an axe. How many man-hours were spent researching the fuel savings of removing olives? How many meetings were spent discussing the rollout of that program? How many hours were spent recording the results? Then think about the opportunity cost of using all those employees to save $100,000. Were there other projects they could have been working on that could have saved even more?

Delta's May 2020 bid is a perfect example. On paper, that saved the company money by moving 1,000 more pilots to the 717 pay rates. Saved about $1.5 million a month on payroll. If that's the only thing you measure, then that was a very smart idea. Too bad the unintended consequences have cost Delta way more money than it saved. Wasting time on scaring pilots about APU burn gives our passengers a bad experience for minor fuel savings equivalent to a rounding error.

Here's an unintended consequence from one captain. He didn't like to start the APU until 10 min before push because according to him since he saved the company some fuel at the gate, he thought it was OK to fly at Mach 0.80 instead of 0.78.
Fair points.
It was Gordon Bethune who said you can't manage what you don't measure.
Margaritaville is offline  
Old 03-16-2022, 10:46 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ReadOnly7's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,337
Default

Originally Posted by OOfff
where I work, we start the APU, then shut it down during the turn
LOTS of “I” and “me” statements coming from this guy. MY passengers and MY FOM…..🙄👎🏻

If I were a betting man, I would say Oofff must have a shiny new stripe on the shoulder and her ego is full throttle now.

Last edited by ReadOnly7; 03-16-2022 at 10:56 AM.
ReadOnly7 is offline  
Old 03-16-2022, 10:51 AM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,750
Default

Originally Posted by ReadOnly7
LOTS of “I” and “me” statements coming from this guy. MY passengers and MY FOM…..

If I were a betting man, I would say Oofff must have a shiny new stripe on the shoulder and her ego is full throttle now.
Gotta be able to afford those shoes and flex privilege….
John Carr is offline  
Old 03-16-2022, 11:10 AM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,721
Default

Originally Posted by ReadOnly7
LOTS of “I” and “me” statements coming from this guy. MY passengers and MY FOM…..🙄👎🏻

If I were a betting man, I would say Oofff must have a shiny new stripe on the shoulder and her ego is full throttle now.
nope. No change in stripes any time recently. This is the main forum, so I recognize people who don’t work at the same place I do post here
OOfff is offline  
Old 03-16-2022, 11:34 AM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ReadOnly7's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,337
Default

In my opinion….the passengers pay for a certain level of decency. There are 180 people on board…each of them paid their 50 cents to not sweat their balls off. Compare it to a restaurant that decides to never give their customers refills on their drinks. You charged those people $3 for a soft drink, and you think it’s ok to further gouge them because of “economy of scale”. I think that’s beneath contempt, and I will be keeping THE (not MY) passengers comfortable. They paid for it.

Multiplying $90 by the thousands of flights that are operated sounds like a lot of money to an individual. To a corporation…..it’s a line item. The simple fact that it’s a CONTROLLABLE cost is why we are told to monitor it. These companies waste money hand over fist for other things that yield little to no ROI….yet we are supposed to make our customers suffer because they are already captive to the situation? Nope.
ReadOnly7 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RachelM
Technical
8
06-27-2019 05:58 AM
Smutter
Regional
10
04-11-2016 08:52 AM
Past V1
Compass Airlines
45
10-08-2008 09:26 AM
vagabond
Major
20
05-03-2008 12:03 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices