Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
APU fuel burn does not matter >

APU fuel burn does not matter

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

APU fuel burn does not matter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-16-2022, 06:43 AM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,721
Default

Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine
OOfff are you intentionally being obtuse? No one is saying to waste money. This thread was for the people who feel guilty about running the APU because the company has scared them into thinking the APU is a large operating cost... It is not. If any crew even has doubts about the temperature in the back, starting the APU is most likely a good idea. It takes time for the APU to actually cool a boarding plane, so if you wait until it reaches the upper limit of passenger comfort, you started it too late. In my experience, the APU is needed to cool the cabin on the majority of flights. Even in the winter, sometimes they blast the hot ground air and they take so long to disconnect the air, that now I need to start the APU to undo that mistake.
the APU is a significant cost across a fleet. Reducing unnecessary use is a great goal. Saying “it doesn’t matter” (quite literally the title of the thread) is incorrect.
OOfff is offline  
Old 03-16-2022, 06:57 AM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,318
Default

APU burn cost definitely add up, but evidently not enough to force changes. Until the the company buys air carts that actually blow enough cold air to maintain cabin temps, until they train the ground crews to hook the air and ground power up first thing when we block in, until they train ground crews to unhook the air right when we call so that we can turn the packs on (737 limit) and maintain temperature, I’ll just run the APU. If they don’t want to make the changes, they can pay for the fuel. It’s their dime.
Hedley is offline  
Old 03-16-2022, 07:06 AM
  #33  
That/It/Thang
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,908
Default

Originally Posted by OOfff
okay. Save $20 per flight. Run those numbers for a year
Sweet. How about more seats in the plane, charge for water. Run those numbers for a year. You sound like ULCC management. Imagine the savings if you guys did cross bleed starts vs using the APU to start the second engine. 🙄
CincoDeMayo is offline  
Old 03-16-2022, 07:06 AM
  #34  
It's 5 o'clock somewhere
 
Margaritaville's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2020
Posts: 2,151
Default

Originally Posted by OOfff
$90*4000 flights per day*365days per year=$131m
Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine
I always hate these kinds of arguments. Anything multiplied by the number of flights we do a year is a large number. Just like when AA removed 2 olives and a magazine from every flight and saved millions too.

How much do we spend a year on GPU fuel and ground air? Subtract that from the 131 million too. The people I’ve seen let APU fuel burn affect their decisions tend to disregard cost index too. That uses way more fuel.
I'll have to say this is a rare time I agree with OOfff. You have to multiply it out by the entire fleet. The numbers do get big and the savings are real. It's a shame that pilots tend not be myopically focused on only their own flight. That's pilot nature.

Also despite it being petty, Crandall was correct about the olives. $100,000 is $100,000. The more money the company has, the more money the pilots can ask for. It's really that simple.

If the ground air isn't cooling there plane, write it up. If it's 100 degrees and the ground air isn't sufficient then do what you gotta do. I see no reason to start an APU on taxi in unless the equipment at the gate is inop or it's 100 degrees.
Margaritaville is offline  
Old 03-16-2022, 07:11 AM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2019
Posts: 144
Default

Originally Posted by Margaritaville
I'll have to say this is a rare time I agree with OOfff. You have to multiply it out by the entire fleet. The numbers do get big and the savings are real. It's a shame that pilots tend not be myopically focused on only their own flight. That's pilot nature.

Also despite it being petty, Crandall was correct about the olives. $100,000 is $100,000. The more money the company has, the more money the pilots can ask for. It's really that simple.

If the ground air isn't cooling there plane, write it up. If it's 100 degrees and the ground air isn't sufficient then do what you gotta do. I see no reason to start an APU on taxi in unless the equipment at the gate is inop or it's 100 degrees.
It gets insanely more expensive when something or someone goes through the engine you left running at the gate.
Foggles is offline  
Old 03-16-2022, 07:14 AM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,518
Default

Originally Posted by Foggles
It gets insanely more expensive when something or someone goes through the engine you left running at the gate.
I've been here a good chunk of time and I've literally never waited for ground power to be plugged in before shutting down an engine. Every memo I've read, at least on my fleet, is to wait to turn on the APU until approaching the gate. I've never seen one that says to never start it at all.
CBreezy is online now  
Old 03-16-2022, 07:17 AM
  #37  
It's 5 o'clock somewhere
 
Margaritaville's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2020
Posts: 2,151
Default

Originally Posted by Foggles
It gets insanely more expensive when something or someone goes through the engine you left running at the gate.
Again, that's myopic. If the ramp did their job and did a FOD check that shouldn't be a problem.

I mean in reality how often does something "go through the engine" running at the gate? It's an infinitely small problem in search of a solution.
Margaritaville is offline  
Old 03-16-2022, 07:21 AM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Posts: 680
Default

Yes, I always love the emails from people sitting in an air conditioned office, which is kept at 70 degrees at all times in the summer, reminding pilots we need to be mindful of APU usage. These same dumb-a$$ managers come up with stupid policies like wanting us to run an engine at the gate while we wait for the $10.00 an hour ground crew to find their last sh!t to give and actually plug the GPU in. And its also completely naivie to think these same mid-level managers will defend any Pilot in front of the FAA and NTSB when one of those poorly trained, high turnover rate, rampers, with Air Pods in ears, walks into the number 1 engine at night that has been motoring for 17 minutes. My all time favorite though is the emails reminding us about APU and SETWA while some of our stations are so understaffed in ground crews, we literally have airplanes waiting over an hour, not for a gate, but for marshalers.

Final point, customers remember whether a flight was enjoyable or not. They remember basic things like, oh, that was the "hottest most miserable flight I've ever taken." Treating customers with respect and making the cabin cool in the summer, especially while at the gate, is one small choice Pilots can make that will help ensure people keep coming back. Treat people like sh!t and they will take their business elsewhere.
3inthegreen is offline  
Old 03-16-2022, 07:25 AM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
2StgTurbine's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,333
Default

Originally Posted by Margaritaville
I mean in reality how often does something "go through the engine" running at the gate? It's an infinitely small problem in search of a solution.
That's not why we want to shut down the engines right away. Rampers routinely forget to check if the beacon is off. They have hearing protection on and walk right up to the spinning engine with a cone that gets sucked in. Happens every couple of years. Only takes one of those events to undo years of your hard work of not starting the APU on taxi in.
2StgTurbine is offline  
Old 03-16-2022, 07:26 AM
  #40  
That/It/Thang
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,908
Default

Originally Posted by 3inthegreen
Yes, I always love the emails from people sitting in an air conditioned office, which is kept at 70 degrees at all times in the summer, reminding pilots we need to be mindful of APU usage. These same dumb-a$$ managers come up with stupid policies like wanting us to run an engine at the gate while we wait for the $10.00 an hour ground crew to find their last sh!t to give and actually plug the GPU in. And its also completely naivie to think these same mid-level managers will defend any Pilot in front of the FAA and NTSB when one of those poorly trained, high turnover rate, rampers, with Air Pods in ears, walks into the number 1 engine at night that has been motoring for 17 minutes. My all time favorite though is the emails reminding us about APU and SETWA while some of our stations are so understaffed in ground crews, we literally have airplanes waiting over an hour, not for a gate, but for marshalers.

Final point, customers remember whether a flight was enjoyable or not. They remember basic things like, oh, that was the "hottest most miserable flight I've ever taken." Treating customers with respect and making the cabin cool in the summer, especially while at the gate, is one small choice Pilots can make that will help ensure people keep coming back. Treat people like sh!t and they will take their business elsewhere.
1000% correct. And I’ll add one more, the tens of thousands wasted annually while you burn gas on the taxiway because your gate is occupied and ops doesn’t want to switch you to the open gate 2 gates over.
CincoDeMayo is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RachelM
Technical
8
06-27-2019 05:58 AM
Smutter
Regional
10
04-11-2016 08:52 AM
Past V1
Compass Airlines
45
10-08-2008 09:26 AM
vagabond
Major
20
05-03-2008 12:03 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices