Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
California income taxes >

California income taxes

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

California income taxes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-25-2019, 02:06 PM
  #301  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CX500T's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Position: NYC 7ERA
Posts: 2,061
Default

Prop 13 is the real estate version of "pull up the ladder, I got mine"
CX500T is offline  
Old 12-25-2019, 03:11 PM
  #302  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,955
Default

Originally Posted by CX500T
Prop 13 is the real estate version of "pull up the ladder, I got mine"
As someone who wants to move to California eventually, it does sting. Bigger picture though, I think it’s a good way to retain and reward the people that lived there longest. Why should someone who has lived in a place when it was quiet and relatively cheap be pushed out just because the neighbors built expensive houses and it became a hot area to live?

I am not anti-gentrification by any means, but I’ve seen families living in neighborhoods their whole lives only to be pushed out at the end by rising property taxes. I think that’s a fair way to let those people stay without getting in the way of the natural growth and development of a neighborhood.
DarkSideMoon is offline  
Old 12-25-2019, 06:04 PM
  #303  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,175
Default

Originally Posted by RamenNoodles
Have any of the anti-California posters here actually ever lived in California? It sounds to me like you’re all just complaining about taxes that you’ve never even had to pay.

When I say lived, I mean actually bought property and put down roots. Two years of mil housing doesn’t count.

Serious question.
Over a decade. Beautiful scenery, decent surf, ridiculous policies resulting in insane cost of living. The entire thing is unsustainable and people are fleeing the state.
Profane Kahuna is offline  
Old 12-25-2019, 06:12 PM
  #304  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,175
Default

Originally Posted by CFI Guy
Prop 13 saves me so much in property taxes (owner occupied and rental home) that my state tax is a moot point. When I retire one day, my income (along with my state taxes) will go down significantly. However, my property taxes are essentially fixed (max 2% increase per year on original purchase price). These homes will be placed into a trust and passed on to the kids (along with the tax rates).

My friends who packed up and moved to Austin a few years ago are almost being driven out by ever-increasing property taxes.
I have rentals in the Austin area. I make a killing on them and the property taxes were capped this year by the governor. My friends who have rentals in California can’t get enough rent to cover the mortgage. Oh yeah, the state income tax is zero percent.
Profane Kahuna is offline  
Old 12-26-2019, 05:18 AM
  #305  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Narrow/Left Wide/Right
Posts: 3,655
Default

Originally Posted by FXLAX
So you want everyone to keep paying more and more each year just to make you feel better about yourself?
What I wanted (because I cashed out last year in fact of my rental) is for the voters to quit spending so much money on govt, or at least when they do, agree to make everybody pay for it.

If I were "king" of Cali, I'd make every boondoggle (public train) and prison guard raise come attached with a bill to the taxpayer that they all would see and pay.

If I continued renting my house in that neighborhood, I'd be essentially locked in at that property tax valuation until I died, no matter how many families moved in and enjoyed the services that the "suckers" that bought more recently were forced to pay for. If you don't see the inequity in that, then I can't help you. As a landlord, I'd be able to continually make more money while rents rose, but not have to worry about crazy CA spending....ie taxes.

I benefited from the "system" several years by keeping my house as a rental, enjoying much lower taxes than many of my neighbors and would agree that it's not "fair" from a moral sense, apparently it is from a legal sense.
full of luv is offline  
Old 12-26-2019, 09:19 PM
  #306  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,490
Default

Originally Posted by DarkSideMoon
As someone who wants to move to California eventually, it does sting. Bigger picture though, I think it’s a good way to retain and reward the people that lived there longest. Why should someone who has lived in a place when it was quiet and relatively cheap be pushed out just because the neighbors built expensive houses and it became a hot area to live?

I am not anti-gentrification by any means, but I’ve seen families living in neighborhoods their whole lives only to be pushed out at the end by rising property taxes. I think that’s a fair way to let those people stay without getting in the way of the natural growth and development of a neighborhood.
I agree with this sentiment. I'm not a fan of ANY tax that isn't based on sales... all the rest feel like legalized theft to me. But I can understand and get behind an annual property tax based on the price of the last sale. Raising someone's property tax because the houses around them has spiked in value is just crazy. No one should ever feel the need to sell their home to pay property taxes.

FWIW, I came to this ideology not from Cali, but from Texas. I bought my first Texas home at a price I thought I could afford and factored taxes into that price I could afford. However, for tax purposes, it had not been evaluated by the county tax authority for many years. My buying the house triggered a new valuation. Normally, this valuation increase is limited on a percentage per year but because a certain modification had been made to the home, that limitation did not apply... actually, there was no legal limit to what the county could say the house was worth in this situation. So they determined the house was valued WAY beyond what I actually paid and I had to pay taxes at a valuation rate WAY beyond what I had paid on the open market the first year I paid taxes.

The difference was enough that, while we could still keep our new home, I had to re-budget our finances. Really, that should never EVER happen. And this was in TEXAS. Not California.
highfarfast is offline  
Old 12-27-2019, 04:41 AM
  #307  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,175
Default

Originally Posted by highfarfast
FWIW, I came to this ideology not from Cali, but from Texas. I bought my first Texas home at a price I thought I could afford and factored taxes into that price I could afford. However, for tax purposes, it had not been evaluated by the county tax authority for many years. My buying the house triggered a new valuation. Normally, this valuation increase is limited on a percentage per year but because a certain modification had been made to the home, that limitation did not apply... actually, there was no legal limit to what the county could say the house was worth in this situation. So they determined the house was valued WAY beyond what I actually paid and I had to pay taxes at a valuation rate WAY beyond what I had paid on the open market the first year I paid taxes.

The difference was enough that, while we could still keep our new home, I had to re-budget our finances. Really, that should never EVER happen. And this was in TEXAS. Not California.
Uhhhhhh you should have easily been able to have the valuation lowered to match the purchase price. I had to do the same thing, no problem.
Profane Kahuna is offline  
Old 12-27-2019, 08:09 AM
  #308  
Strike averted!
 
at6d's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: B737
Posts: 3,789
Default

If prop 13 is repealed and 100% of the property owners would suddenly owe assessed taxes based on million dollar average valuations, the economy would collapse.
at6d is offline  
Old 12-27-2019, 06:14 PM
  #309  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,490
Default

Originally Posted by Profane Kahuna
Uhhhhhh you should have easily been able to have the valuation lowered to match the purchase price. I had to do the same thing, no problem.
This was years ago and I don't remember how all the details went down. I do know that I tried to protest to the county tax assessor and when all was said and done, the property taxes on my house was based on a valuation of more than what I actually paid and the property taxes on my houses went up over 40% from one year to the next.
highfarfast is offline  
Old 12-27-2019, 06:25 PM
  #310  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Omniscient's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2019
Posts: 813
Default

Originally Posted by highfarfast
This was years ago and I don't remember how all the details went down. I do know that I tried to protest to the county tax assessor and when all was said and done, the property taxes on my house was based on a valuation of more than what I actually paid and the property taxes on my houses went up over 40% from one year to the next.
I can remember as far back as 2000, Texas residents being allowed to appeal your appraisal and arrange a date to argue your case in front of the tax accessors office. There is quite a few business firms that will argue your case for you, in exchange for a percentage of the savings...point being, there is a process in place and it sounds like you missed it and the local government took full advantage of you. Sorry you got hosed but just trying to point out the system isnt as rouge as what happened to you.
Omniscient is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MartinBishop
Money Talk
27
05-13-2016 07:27 AM
Sluggo_63
FedEx
27
02-03-2016 12:31 PM
BMEP100
United
7
09-06-2015 09:58 AM
MD11HOG
Cargo
2
04-13-2010 04:18 AM
wannabepilot
Hangar Talk
0
04-25-2008 09:19 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices