Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
340 near miss with Russian satilite >

340 near miss with Russian satilite

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

340 near miss with Russian satilite

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-28-2007, 12:49 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 345
Default 340 near miss with Russian satilite

A LAN chile 340 reported a near miss with a deorbiting russian satilite. It passed only 5 miles in front of the plane! That would have been an amazing sight to see from the pilots view

http://www.mercopress.com/vernoticia...3&formato=HTML
Linebacker35 is offline  
Old 03-29-2007, 02:03 PM
  #2  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 49
Default

I've seen plenty of shooting stars at night, but that takes the cake. I guess we should start scanning for traffic coming in from 12 O'Clock HIGH.
JSTARSPILOT is offline  
Old 03-29-2007, 02:12 PM
  #3  
With The Resistance
 
jungle's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
Posts: 6,191
Default

Maybe not:


SANTIAGO, Chile - Pilots of a Chilean commercial jetliner spotted flaming objects falling past their plane as it headed for a landing in New Zealand, airline officials said Wednesday.
ADVERTISEMENT

U.S. experts suggested the objects were likely meteors burning up in the earth's atmosphere and questioned Australian media reports they were probably pieces of a falling Russian spacecraft.

LAN Chile airline said in a brief statement that the pilot, who was not identified, "made visual contact with incandescent fragments" several miles away on Monday. The Airbus 340 had just entered New Zealand airspace when the space debris was spotted.

The airline said it reported the incident to authorities in Chile and New Zealand.

Web sites of several Australian news media quoted officials as saying that pieces of a Russian satellite had narrowly missed the jet.

But Nicholas Johnson, orbital debris chief scientist for
NASA's Johnson Space Center, said that was likely not the case. Russian space junk was expected to come back to Earth — but not until about 12 hours after the incident with the jet, Johnson said.

He said he checked with the Russians and the debris — an empty Progress resupply ship that had been at the
International Space Station — re-entered Earth's atmosphere on schedule.

"Unless someone has their times wrong, there appears to be no correlation," Johnson told The Associated Press.

About 50 meteoroids enter the Earth's atmosphere every day — mostly burning up as they speed toward the planet — said Bill Ailor, director of the Center for Orbital and Reentry Debris Studies at the Aerospace Corporation of El Segundo, Calif.

Those that survive and hit the ground are called meteorites.

By contrast, about 150 pieces of man-made space junk fall back to Earth each year, with about two-thirds of it coming as unplanned entries, Ailor said.

Larger pieces of man-made space equipment, such as the Progress resupply ship, have motors to guide them back to Earth, Ailor said. If they are calculated to have more than a 1 in 10,000 chance of hitting people, they are shifted to a safer path, he said, though small errors can lead to large variations in where the debris hits.

No one has ever been killed by space junk, Ailor said, although in 1997, an Oklahoma woman was grazed in the shoulder by piece.

___

Associated Press Science Writer Seth Borenstein contributed to this story from Washington.
jungle is offline  
Old 03-29-2007, 02:28 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
fireman0174's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: Retired 121 pilot
Posts: 1,033
Default

Originally Posted by JSTARSPILOT
12 O'Clock HIGH.
A great WWII movie.
fireman0174 is online now  
Old 03-31-2007, 06:18 PM
  #5  
Gets all holidays off
 
fr8rcaptain's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2005
Position: Retired UPS 767 Captain, SDF Z
Posts: 431
Default

Originally Posted by Linebacker35
A LAN chile 340 reported a near miss with a deorbiting russian satilite. It passed only 5 miles in front of the plane! That would have been an amazing sight to see from the pilots view

http://www.mercopress.com/vernoticia...3&formato=HTML
Five miles, eh? What, did it show up on the "fishfinder?" Judging distances at night is a tough job, during the day it isn't easy either. Unless you pass through the smoke trail, it was probably dozens of miles away.

I've seen burning space debris at night, and it is spectacular. Initially I think it's close, due to the brightness, but then I realize its many many miles away.
fr8rcaptain is offline  
Old 03-31-2007, 06:59 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
WingOffLight's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: 1st class
Posts: 250
Default

whatever

If your flying out in the middle of south pacific and your hit with any type of post orbital space junk moving over 10000fps its just your time buddy. Your number is up! I couldnt even guess the odds.......
WingOffLight is offline  
Old 03-31-2007, 08:19 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: Contract purgatory
Posts: 701
Default

Space agents blamed for mid-air near miss
Russian space experts are being asked to explain how they got wrong the re-entry time of a falling satellite that narrowly missed a jetliner over the Pacific Ocean on Monday night. Flaming pieces of the satellite are thought to have come within five nautical miles (9.2km) of a Lan Chile Airbus A340 travelling from Santiago, the Chilean capital, to Auckland and Sydney


I thought their excuse sounded fishy, if not a fairly improbable.
KoruPilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SkyHigh
Hangar Talk
28
10-25-2006 08:14 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices