Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Jump Seat as a Political Tool >

Jump Seat as a Political Tool

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Jump Seat as a Political Tool

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-29-2007, 02:34 PM
  #91  
Gets Weekends Off
 
captjns's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Posts: 5,995
Default

It is true that a Captain has the right to deny a pilot a ride on his jet, for adequate reasons of course. However, I don't think that because that a pilot employed by a non-union airline would be an acceptable excuse, especially where a jump seat agreement is in place. Do you think the chief pilot or D.O. would stand for such inappropriate behavior? Yeah I know there are some that boast they deny the jump seat to these types of folks because their airline does not have a union. But I'll bet these bravado types wouldn't have the balls to tell these poor folks to their face the true reason why they are being denied the jump seat.
captjns is offline  
Old 03-29-2007, 03:41 PM
  #92  
AAmerican Way for AA Pay
 
B757200ER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: B-737 Pilot
Posts: 1,617
Default

Originally Posted by captjns
It is true that a Captain has the right to deny a pilot a ride on his jet, for adequate reasons of course. However, I don't think that because that a pilot employed by a non-union airline would be an acceptable excuse, especially where a jump seat agreement is in place. Do you think the chief pilot or D.O. would stand for such inappropriate behavior?
If you deny a pilot from a non-union carrier the j/s, and your company has a reciprocal agreement with that non-union carrier, you are in VIOLATION of that reciprocal jumpseat agreement, PERIOD. Yes, you may get a phone call or do a rugdance with the Chief Pilot. At my last company, you could be terminated for denying eligible pilots the j/s without good reason.
B757200ER is offline  
Old 03-29-2007, 04:15 PM
  #93  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 973
Default

Originally Posted by B757200ER
If you deny a pilot from a non-union carrier the j/s, and your company has a reciprocal agreement with that non-union carrier, you are in VIOLATION of that reciprocal jumpseat agreement, PERIOD. Yes, you may get a phone call or do a rugdance with the Chief Pilot. At my last company, you could be terminated for denying eligible pilots the j/s without good reason.

My Company's FOM (NWA) states quite clearly that the Captain retains the right of admitance or refusal of the JS. The captain is only required to file a report to the company justifying the reason for refusal if the JS rider is a NWA pilot. I don't believe that your former company would terminate the captain for refusing an off line JS rider....doesn't make sense....Who was your former company anyway?
reddog25 is offline  
Old 03-29-2007, 04:19 PM
  #94  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Velocipede's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Position: 737NG CA
Posts: 766
Default

Who said I would deny a SKW pilot? Read the WHOLE thread for comprehension, please. The last I looked, SKW wasn't flying A320s, 737s or any other narrowbody airliner. Therefore, its apples to oranges.

And, BTW, SKW virtually the same rates as other regional carriers. And you pay significantly MORE than jetBlue pays their EMB pilots. Therefore, you're not undercutting anyone's Union contract. In fact, B6 is undercutting YOU by paying less to fly an airplane with 30 more seats. YOU should be denying the jumpeat to B6!

SKW? Welcome aboard!

Last edited by Velocipede; 03-29-2007 at 04:25 PM.
Velocipede is offline  
Old 03-29-2007, 04:32 PM
  #95  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Velocipede's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Position: 737NG CA
Posts: 766
Default

Originally Posted by reddog25
My Company's FOM (NWA) states quite clearly that the Captain retains the right of admitance or refusal of the JS...I don't believe that your former company would terminate the captain for refusing an off line JS rider....doesn't make sense....Who was your former company anyway?
You're right. They're full of hot air. Virtually all FOMs support the Captain as the FINAL AUTHORITY on who rides the jumpseat, reciprocal agreements be damned. There are certain designated personnel who MUST be allowed access to the jumpseat, but that is a very specialized group.

And no disiciplinary action is ever taken or contemplated against Captains who refuse jumpseaters. We had a Captain who would not allow Company pilots on his jumpseat, much less off line freeloaders. His rationale, "I don't ask for the jumpseat, so I don't give it." NO ONE EVER QUESTIONED HIS AUTHORITY.

The same holds true for me. I don't ask B6 for a ride, so I don't feel compelled to offer their non-Union pilots a UNION negotiated privilege.

Remember that word, all you guys who think you have the right to a jumpseat ride just because there is a reciprocal agreement. Its still a privilege. And the CAPTAIN ALONE determines who that privilege will be extended to.
Velocipede is offline  
Old 03-29-2007, 05:03 PM
  #96  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7
Default

Originally Posted by Velocipede
Who said I would deny a SKW pilot? Read the WHOLE thread for comprehension, please. The last I looked, SKW wasn't flying A320s, 737s or any other narrowbody airliner. Therefore, its apples to oranges.

And, BTW, SKW virtually the same rates as other regional carriers. And you pay significantly MORE than jetBlue pays their EMB pilots. Therefore, you're not undercutting anyone's Union contract. In fact, B6 is undercutting YOU by paying less to fly an airplane with 30 more seats. YOU should be denying the jumpeat to B6!

SKW? Welcome aboard!
VelociTool,

Skywest flies 50-70-90 CRJ's for the same rate that ACA/comair/wiskey flew 50 seaters for. When United began the Bain process of forcing all regionals to the "market" rate first we had to deal with Mesa's ALPA contract, then the 70 seat rates were compromised by Skywest flying them for 50 seat rates. The current regional airline rates are all similar because one bankrupt legacy after another followed UAL's lead with the new "market" rate.

I've lived thru several rounds of concessionary contracts followed by a shutdown. Your statement that Skywest doesn't count is bunk. they do it at the level beneath you. that forces the costs down on regional lift, making it more attractive to management to replace your aircraft with an E170 or CRJ900. Using your progressive (ha) line of logic these Skywest pilots are just as dangerous to your CBA and livelyhood as any others.

Even though I was burned by the "lower cost" regionals, i'd never tell a pilot (except a SCAB) that they can't have a ride because of their rate of pay, or work rules. Best bet is to break out your "better" contract and show them what a determined group can achieve.
ralphcramden1 is offline  
Old 03-29-2007, 05:13 PM
  #97  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Fins Up's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: Passed out in my hammock
Posts: 299
Default

Originally Posted by Velocipede
And, BTW, SKW virtually the same rates as other regional carriers. And you pay significantly MORE than jetBlue pays their EMB pilots. Therefore, you're not undercutting anyone's Union contract. In fact, B6 is undercutting YOU by paying less to fly an airplane with 30 more seats. YOU should be denying the jumpeat to B6!

SKW? Welcome aboard!
Is this just flamebait or what? That is completely wrong on all counts, straight up rates, seat-to-seat, and $/passenger. You should check out this site called airlinepilotcentral.com. They post payrates for most airlines.
Fins Up is offline  
Old 03-29-2007, 08:32 PM
  #98  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: 767 Cap
Posts: 1,306
Default

Originally Posted by Velocipede
Remember that word, all you guys who think you have the right to a jumpseat ride just because there is a reciprocal agreement. Its still a privilege. And the CAPTAIN ALONE determines who that privilege will be extended to.
And if the Captain wants to be a raving A###ole, just avoid Alaska and JS with someone else. Most Capts are not drunk with their authority.
fdx727pilot is offline  
Old 03-30-2007, 01:13 AM
  #99  
Gets Weekends Off
 
captjns's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Posts: 5,995
Default

Originally Posted by Velocipede
And no disiciplinary action is ever taken or contemplated against Captains who refuse jumpseaters. We had a Captain who would not allow Company pilots on his jumpseat, much less off line freeloaders. His rationale, "I don't ask for the jumpseat, so I don't give it." NO ONE EVER QUESTIONED HIS AUTHORITY.

The same holds true for me. I don't ask B6 for a ride, so I don't feel compelled to offer their non-Union pilots a UNION negotiated privilege.

Remember that word, all you guys who think you have the right to a jumpseat ride just because there is a reciprocal agreement. Its still a privilege. And the CAPTAIN ALONE determines who that privilege will be extended to.
Its not offering the jump seat that is in question, its denying the jumps seat. True the captain has the final authority, and a written explanation usually is required to be filed with the chief pilot for obvious reasons. However, you never stated, and come on be honest, that you submit an explanation to your chief pilot the reason for denial of jump seat is because the individual may be with Jet Blue, a non union carrier, and you don't recognize such pilots. Man I would love to be a fly on the wall, if you did have the balls acted in an insane manner, while your chief pilot and perhaps your DO gave you a dressing down.
captjns is offline  
Old 03-30-2007, 02:18 AM
  #100  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ClutchCargo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: Retired FDX MD11 Capt
Posts: 887
Default Capt's Authority

I don't know about other carriers but at FDX the Capt. has complete and total control of the cockpit J/S. The FAA has expressly forbidden management from questioning a Captains decision to deny a J/S. The exception of course is the standard FAA, Secret Service, etc. This is as it should be. That being said I would personally not deny the J/S unless the person was on "The List" or was an FDX non-member.
ClutchCargo is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LOW FUEL
Major
5
03-06-2007 12:35 PM
ryane946
Regional
24
01-16-2007 06:24 PM
texas_pilot
Cargo
5
12-11-2006 01:46 PM
mike734
Major
1
11-02-2006 06:43 PM
Delta102
Hangar Talk
1
11-18-2005 08:30 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices