The Future Of Artificial Intelligence
#161
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,327
How much will they have to pay someone to fly single pilot like that? 1000 an hour? Is that really a savings at that point?
#162
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Posts: 5,993
#163
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Posts: 149
#164
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 3,222
#165
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,504
An airplane can take off and land all by itself does not equate to removing all pilots and automating everything. The problem with driverless cars are not that they can't drive themselves. That's been successfully proven over and over. It's that they can't interact 100% successfully with the human element. When they do it wrong, it isn't like "oops, they made the wrong turn." No. Someone is hurt or someone dies. That is unacceptable risk when the alternative is it not happening and paying maybe an extra 50 cents per passenger. And they don't have the pattern recognition and learning capability of humans yet. Just this summer alone I've batted away a bad vector into dangerous activity the next gen aircraft radar did not see dozens of times. Ever been to NY? You think those controllers care about flying you through moderate turbulence? Or when I got reroutes that would have had me landing with no gas. Or when I've gotten reroutes that put us behind 30 minutes but we were able to ask for shortcuts getting us in on time. None of this the computer can do. When you give a computer an instruction it isn't able to do, it doesn't usually give alternative suggestions. It just says no. We aren't there yet.
We haven't fully automated trains yet and that should be the single easiest and cost effective change.
#166
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 3,222
So, you don't have any. Got it. You're just bad at drawing useful conclusions.
An airplane can take off and land all by itself does not equate to removing all pilots and automating everything. The problem with driverless cars are not that they can't drive themselves. That's been successfully proven over and over. It's that they can't interact 100% successfully with the human element. When they do it wrong, it isn't like "oops, they made the wrong turn." No. Someone is hurt or someone dies. That is unacceptable risk when the alternative is it not happening and paying maybe an extra 50 cents per passenger. And they don't have the pattern recognition and learning capability of humans yet. Just this summer alone I've batted away a bad vector into dangerous activity the next gen aircraft radar did not see dozens of times. Ever been to NY? You think those controllers care about flying you through moderate turbulence? Or when I got reroutes that would have had me landing with no gas. Or when I've gotten reroutes that put us behind 30 minutes but we were able to ask for shortcuts getting us in on time. None of this the computer can do. When you give a computer an instruction it isn't able to do, it doesn't usually give alternative suggestions. It just says no. We aren't there yet.
We haven't fully automated trains yet and that should be the single easiest and cost effective change.
An airplane can take off and land all by itself does not equate to removing all pilots and automating everything. The problem with driverless cars are not that they can't drive themselves. That's been successfully proven over and over. It's that they can't interact 100% successfully with the human element. When they do it wrong, it isn't like "oops, they made the wrong turn." No. Someone is hurt or someone dies. That is unacceptable risk when the alternative is it not happening and paying maybe an extra 50 cents per passenger. And they don't have the pattern recognition and learning capability of humans yet. Just this summer alone I've batted away a bad vector into dangerous activity the next gen aircraft radar did not see dozens of times. Ever been to NY? You think those controllers care about flying you through moderate turbulence? Or when I got reroutes that would have had me landing with no gas. Or when I've gotten reroutes that put us behind 30 minutes but we were able to ask for shortcuts getting us in on time. None of this the computer can do. When you give a computer an instruction it isn't able to do, it doesn't usually give alternative suggestions. It just says no. We aren't there yet.
We haven't fully automated trains yet and that should be the single easiest and cost effective change.
#167
It wasn't just about automating a flight deck. You've claimed we're going to be single pilot in 10 years. But you have nothing to back that up other than the technology exists. Pretty tough to connect those dots when one actually starts looking at reality.
Just think of a typical takeoff. After rotation we must raise the gear and flaps. Why? Why isn't that automated? Or on landing, it can easily be automated as well. "Drop gear at xxxx altitude".
I personally don't see aircraft operated from the ground at this point. But a reduction in pilots required? Sure.
I personally don't see aircraft operated from the ground at this point. But a reduction in pilots required? Sure.
We're still waiting.
#168
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 3,222
No - here's what you've posted in this thread:
It wasn't just about automating a flight deck. You've claimed we're going to be single pilot in 10 years. But you have nothing to back that up other than the technology exists. Pretty tough to connect those dots when one actually starts looking at reality.
Yup - 10+ million per mod. 3 crew down to 2 (which matches the rest of the industry). Not that same as 2 down to 1.
You've been telling us all how easy this is and it's coming in 10 years. But, you have yet to answer any of the "reality check" questions I asked you or tell us who is going to pay for this and why they would do that, given the current state of technology and the cost involved versus the benefit.
We're still waiting.
It wasn't just about automating a flight deck. You've claimed we're going to be single pilot in 10 years. But you have nothing to back that up other than the technology exists. Pretty tough to connect those dots when one actually starts looking at reality.
Yup - 10+ million per mod. 3 crew down to 2 (which matches the rest of the industry). Not that same as 2 down to 1.
You've been telling us all how easy this is and it's coming in 10 years. But, you have yet to answer any of the "reality check" questions I asked you or tell us who is going to pay for this and why they would do that, given the current state of technology and the cost involved versus the benefit.
We're still waiting.
#169
You ignore the power of the almighty $$. Until it saves someone money and they're willing to pay for the mod, that in and of itself will "nix" it (at least on an industry wide commercial scale). Keep us appraised on how it comes along. We'll check in with you in another 25 years or so.
#170
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Position: A320
Posts: 195
Not gonna happen. Don’t even see self driving cars in 20 years. In 20 years all these cars ands trucks are driverless? Laughable! The trains won’t even be automated in 20 years. They’ll never be able to make a computer better than the human brain.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post