Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Anyone getting hired without a degree? >

Anyone getting hired without a degree?

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Anyone getting hired without a degree?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-02-2017, 07:40 PM
  #211  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Do I need to pull this van over, children?
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 06-02-2017, 07:52 PM
  #212  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Das Auto's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 684
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
Do I need to pull this van over, children?
Please do. Thank you.
Das Auto is offline  
Old 06-02-2017, 07:58 PM
  #213  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Dirtdiver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 767A
Posts: 791
Default

Originally Posted by iceman49
Lots of the PAA pilots (former NAL) that were hired in 78 were merged in and after DL pilots that had not even been hired.


700 PAA pilots came over with the acquisition, 286 captains, the rest FOs and FEs. They came with A310s and 727s, so they integrated the captains in at a 12 to 1 ratio starting with the DL 7er captains. The rest were integrated 11:1. DL anticipated continued hiring leading up to the SLI date, which would have made the math work. But hiring stopped, and a small number of the PAA guys ended up on the bottom. No way those bottom guys were '78 hires, unless they were some kind of special case permanent FE/non-pilots.
Dirtdiver is offline  
Old 06-02-2017, 08:30 PM
  #214  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,383
Default

This industry is stupid. And i've been in it for 28 years. Threads and threads of which interview consulting company, what to do to make a perfect resume, and which transvestite job fair to go to in October. Holy $hit. What happened?
Learflyer is offline  
Old 06-02-2017, 08:48 PM
  #215  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ebl14's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: 73N
Posts: 860
Default

The moral of the story: if you have a degree and used it to get to your airline of choice, you better not misspell a word or the point of your post will be negated by those who have a serious case of degree envy. I think the horse is dead boys, but what the heck... go ahead and wear yourselves out.
ebl14 is offline  
Old 06-02-2017, 10:03 PM
  #216  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
Default

Originally Posted by Das Auto
That fly planes carry what?

LOLZ?

I thought it was a requirement to be able to comprehend the English language. I also thought you needed to be over the age of 23 for an ATP.

Are you even a real pilot? Do you even have a degree?
LOLZ.

I can see I've pushed your big red buttons a bit too hard so I'll back off a bit.

Yes, I'm older than 23. I have an ATP - got it more than two decades ago. Was older than 23 when I soloed in a tweet (T-37), which was a few years before I got my ATP. Do the math and feel free to call me immature (immature just like most pilots I know).

Am I a Real pilot? I'm not sure what you mean. I fly aircraft for United airlines and am paid to do it. Does that make me a Real pilot or is there some higher threshold I need to meet in order to be a Real pilot?

I have a BS degree from a university. When I was looking to get hired, I had interview offers from United, Northwest, Delta, and American. I didn't apply to Southwest. I went for the first class date. So yes, I think that having a four year degree is essential if one wants to get hired by a major.

Again, I've heard the unicorn stories of pilots who have been hired at the Big 4 without a 4 year degree. I've never met any of them and there's probably a whole lot more of a backstory for those that have gotten hired without a 4 year degree. The number of pilots hired at the Big 4 without a 4 year degree is a rounding error.

Sadly, a couple of months after this particular thread dies a tortured death, a new one asking the same question will be started by another shlub who thinks he can get hired at the Big 4 without a 4 year degree.
Andy is offline  
Old 06-03-2017, 03:36 AM
  #217  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,412
Default

Originally Posted by iceman49
Lots of the PAA pilots (former NAL) that were hired in 78 were merged in and after DL pilots that had not even been hired.
It's amazing the made up stuff you find on forums!
sailingfun is offline  
Old 06-03-2017, 06:28 AM
  #218  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,716
Default

[QUOTE=Dirtdiver;2373411]700 PAA pilots came over with the acquisition, 286 captains, the rest FOs and FEs. They came with A310s and 727s, so they integrated the captains in at a 12 to 1 ratio starting with the DL 7er captains. The rest were integrated 11:1. DL anticipated continued hiring leading up to the SLI date, which would have made the math work. But hiring stopped, and a small number of the PAA guys ended up on the bottom. No way those bottom guys were '78 hires, unless they were some kind of special case permanent FE/non-pilots.[/QUOTE

I was a 9-78 National DOH, the guys in my class Ended up at Delta as a 89, Lost 11 out of 13 years, and took 3 years to get to their pay rate. I bailed and 6 years later ended up at NWA.

Last edited by iceman49; 06-03-2017 at 06:52 AM.
iceman49 is offline  
Old 06-03-2017, 06:57 AM
  #219  
Gets Weekends Off
 
tomgoodman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: 767A (Ret)
Posts: 6,248
Default

Originally Posted by Learflyer
This industry is stupid.
"If the Wright Brothers were alive today, Orville would have to lay off Wilbur."

--- Robert Crandall
tomgoodman is offline  
Old 06-03-2017, 07:16 AM
  #220  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,716
Default

[QUOTE=Dirtdiver;2373411]700 PAA pilots came over with the acquisition, 286 captains, the rest FOs and FEs. They came with A310s and 727s, so they integrated the captains in at a 12 to 1 ratio starting with the DL 7er captains. The rest were integrated 11:1. DL anticipated continued hiring leading up to the SLI date, which would have made the math work. But hiring stopped, and a small number of the PAA guys ended up on the bottom. No way those bottom guys were '78 hires, unless they were some kind of special case permanent FE/non-pilots.[/QUOTE

I was a 9-78 National DOH, the guys in my class Ended up at Delta as a 89, Lost 11 out of 13 years, and took 3 years to get to their pay rate. I bailed and 6 years later ended up at NWA.

Another reason the seniority numbers should be based on age vs SS numbers.

Notes from court proceedings


In another set of undated handwritten notes, Alger, ruminating over the potential labor conflicts that could emerge out of the integration of Pan Am personnel, wrote, “Long Term potential [for labor strife] put here after the Bad Apples have long since retired.”

Delta had purchased, in the transatlantic routes, the cream of the Pan Am crop;  and the pilots who flew those routes were among the most senior at Pan Am. For commercial airline pilots, seniority is everything.


The seniority status of Delta's pilots was protected in the collective bargaining agreement Delta had with the pilots' labor union, the Air Line Pilots Association (“ALPA”).1  As is the custom in the airline industry, that agreement required Delta to place newly hired pilots at the bottom of Delta's seniority list, regardless of the length of cockpit experience the newly hired pilot may have had with other airlines.  (For this reason, pilots typically spend their entire careers with a single airline;  the switching costs for senior pilots are too high.)   However, the senior Pan Am pilots that Delta needed made it clear that they would not leave Pan Am, even if it was in bankruptcy, if they were to be cast down to the bottom of the Delta pilot seniority list.   Thus, to close the APA and meet its turnkey objectives, Delta had to negotiate a concession from ALPA that would amend the collective bargaining agreement to let Delta integrate the Pan Am pilots into the Delta seniority list.


The starting point for the integration was the position held by the most senior Delta pilot of whatever aircraft was deemed to be most nearly equivalent to the A-310. Delta deemed its Boeing 767ER (“B-767ER”) to be most equivalent to the A-310 because both were long-haul twin-engine aircraft, although the B-767ER was not cleared for over-ocean voyages.


This resulted in a ratio of approximately twelve to one.   Thus, one Pan Am captain was integrated after every twelve spots beneath #590-at #603, #616, #629, #641 and so on.


Thus, once they moved over to Delta, several Pan Am pilots were relegated to cockpit positions, aircraft, and routes less desirable than those they had flown at Pan Am. For example, some 55-year-old Pan Am pilots found themselves flying in positions junior to 35-year-old pilots who had been with Delta their entire career.   However, the Pan Am pilots were integrated in seniority order-that is, within the integrated seniority list, and thus, Pan Am pilots maintained their seniority relative to other Pan Am pilots.


In addition to the integration methodology, Delta set two other terms of employment for the Pan Am pilots that are at issue in this case:  a ten-year service requirement for fully paid post-retirement medical benefits and a pay scale that increased pay rates from Pan Am levels to Delta levels gradually over three years.


Years ago, Delta management had instituted a ten-year service requirement before Delta would pay the full cost of a non-pilot employee's post-retirement medical insurance premiums.   The ten-year service requirement was eventually applied to Delta's pilots when Delta and ALPA entered into a collective bargaining agreement in October 1990.   However, in August 1991, the ten-year service requirement was waived to exempt all pilots who were on the Delta seniority list as of August 27, 1991 and had reached age 50 on or before January 1, 1992.
Because the Pan Am pilots were not integrated into the seniority list until November 1, 1991, none of them qualified for this grandfather clause.   As discussed above, at the time of the APA, Delta did not permit its captains and first officers to bid down for flight engineer positions after they had reached the FAA-mandated retirement age of 60.   Thus, any Pan Am pilots who were over 50 at the time of the APA would not be able to qualify for fully paid post-retirement medical benefits unless they were willing to accept employment in a ground position after they turned 60.
Here, Plaintiffs have shown that Alger, the Delta management representative assigned to investigate and evaluate the Pan Am acquisition, made numerous comments about the age of the Pan Am pilot force, referring to them as “contaminated” and “Bad Apples.”  


Delta took full advantage of Pan Am's financial misfortunes, giving Plaintiffs the unenviable choice of joining Delta as second-class citizens or hanging on with Pan Am, which had already filed for bankruptcy.   While we sympathize with the pilots who were impaled on the horns of this dilemma, we can find no actionable misconduct by the defendants.


ABDU BRISSON III 489 700 v. DELTA AIR LINES INC | FindLaw

iceman49 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
WARich
Delta
11220
06-10-2020 07:42 AM
DCA A321 FO
American
373
08-18-2015 02:45 AM
AirportKid
Flight Schools and Training
70
09-25-2011 06:47 AM
FlyHigh423
Major
74
12-04-2008 11:05 AM
jasonn9999
Major
31
12-12-2007 10:49 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices