"Open-Skies" agreement is coming - Your Opinion
#71
Thank you W?
A few recent headlines:
Stocks end higher amid global stability signs
Jobless claims at lowest level in month
Fed: Most of U.S. seeing modest growth
and my favorite
Worker productivity rises as wages soar
Just a little taste of reality for all you "sky-is-falling", "outsourcing is killing America", "American jobs and wages are circling the drain" folks. Enjoy.
Stocks end higher amid global stability signs
Jobless claims at lowest level in month
Fed: Most of U.S. seeing modest growth
and my favorite
Worker productivity rises as wages soar
Just a little taste of reality for all you "sky-is-falling", "outsourcing is killing America", "American jobs and wages are circling the drain" folks. Enjoy.
#72
Tom
http://www.princeton.edu/~ceps/worki...119blinder.pdf,
http://www.aflcio.org/issues/jobseco...born_China.pdf
Last edited by NGINEWHOISWHAT; 03-28-2007 at 06:21 AM.
#73
Whats ANA pay? Whats Cathay pay? Whats JAL pay? These carriers are not driving wages down. The economics are similar, why can't the U.S. carriers compete? If we prohibit all foreign airlines from hauling cargo into the U.S., should the rest of the world prohibit UPS and FedEx from hauling cargo into their country?
Making a profit is their job, it's what the shareholders pay them to do.
#75
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 440
After reviewing the U.S.-E.U. tentative air transport agreement reached last Friday, ALPA has serious concerns about the agreement’s potential effect on airline workers in its provisions on ownership of U.S. airlines, on franchising, and on providing foreign airliners with crew to U.S. airlines.
First, foreing ownership. Over the past 6 years, this is what has been observed when looking at the pax carriers:
1: 4 major U.S. airlines filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, one of
them filing for it twice.
2: Most of the carriers reporting record losses.
3: Employees receiving furlough notices in record numbers.
4: Employees forced to endure cutbacks in wages and benefits.
5: Pensions literally being erased.
I am not advocating foreign ownership of any U.S. corportation. I am looking at the way the airlines have been managed over the last half-decade and cannot help but wonder if the management blunders could possibly get any worse. People talk about how bad foreign ownership of U.S. airlines would be for it's employees, but one has to admit that the last 6 years have not exactly been a honeymoon for labor under the current domestic ownership.
Second, the airlines have to come to the realization that price is NOT the only factor when most people shop around for a ticket. Service should also rank very high. When travelling just a few hundered miles, I look for the lowest fare. But when travelling longer distances, especially overseas on personal travel, I am willing to pay a higher fare for better service. And I have no problem spending my money on a foreign carrier if they can provide that service.
The service on domestic carriers, with very, very rare exception is absolutely pathetic. If the pax carriers want to be successful, customer service and satisfaction has to improve.
#76
I am not advocating foreign ownership of any U.S. corportation. I am looking at the way the airlines have been managed over the last half-decade and cannot help but wonder if the management blunders could possibly get any worse. People talk about how bad foreign ownership of U.S. airlines would be for it's employees, but one has to admit that the last 6 years have not exactly been a honeymoon for labor under the current domestic ownership.
The leases remain the same, but the cost of labor dramtically decreases. Instead of making 100-1500 per day, it's much less. So, THAT'S the primary concern my friend. We can not compete with a communist nation with a bazillion people.
If they come in and buy us, they can put whatever crews on whatever routes they want and downsize us. Keep the profitable flying for themselves and then sell us.
The Europeans can do the same thing, but I'm not an economist so I can't say for certain. A lot of costs are higher in Europe, but despite what some people say, the dollar is still king although it has taken a beating. Everyone still wants into the US market.
#77
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 440
My only concern with foreign ownership is this: If a Chinese airline could own an American carrier, they could do it a lot cheaper and almost overnight put thousands out of work. Other countries don't have to refine fuel to our levels. I don't know if this is true of jet a, but it's true of Diesel and they are nearly the same. Less refinement equals cheaper fuel.
The leases remain the same, but the cost of labor dramtically decreases. Instead of making 100-1500 per day, it's much less. So, THAT'S the primary concern my friend. We can not compete with a communist nation with a bazillion people.
If they come in and buy us, they can put whatever crews on whatever routes they want and downsize us. Keep the profitable flying for themselves and then sell us.
The Europeans can do the same thing, but I'm not an economist so I can't say for certain. A lot of costs are higher in Europe, but despite what some people say, the dollar is still king although it has taken a beating. Everyone still wants into the US market.
The leases remain the same, but the cost of labor dramtically decreases. Instead of making 100-1500 per day, it's much less. So, THAT'S the primary concern my friend. We can not compete with a communist nation with a bazillion people.
If they come in and buy us, they can put whatever crews on whatever routes they want and downsize us. Keep the profitable flying for themselves and then sell us.
The Europeans can do the same thing, but I'm not an economist so I can't say for certain. A lot of costs are higher in Europe, but despite what some people say, the dollar is still king although it has taken a beating. Everyone still wants into the US market.
#78
Second, the airlines have to come to the realization that price is NOT the only factor when most people shop around for a ticket. Service should also rank very high. When travelling just a few hundered miles, I look for the lowest fare. But when travelling longer distances, especially overseas on personal travel, I am willing to pay a higher fare for better service. And I have no problem spending my money on a foreign carrier if they can provide that service..
The second half of your statement may be true. When you lock yourself in a tube for 15 hours, you may consider service, but for domestic operations, price is king.
The average passenger is only interested in going from Dallas to Orlando for $49. And everyone else has to suffer because the airlines won't price their tickets high enough to afford amenities anymore. You want something to eat? You'll pay extra for it. Take an extra suitcase? Pony up. Want a paper ticket? $10 please.
That's what you asked for when you supported deregulation and let the LCC monster out of the cage. Now everyone has to work toward the magic $.07 seat mile.
#79
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Good,
I would rather not pay $475 to go DFW to MCO. Even if it included a $3 meal and a $.75 paper ticket.
Under regulation I probably would have a choice of 3 flights instead of 50 +. There are a whole lot more pilots flying those 50 flights than there were flying those 3 flights. A whole lot more people riding too. They may not meet your standards, but they are spending money.
Service does count. When I go to MCO I fly on NW at a little premium because I don't like the SWA cattle call. If it was a big premium I would probably take SW.
I would rather not pay $475 to go DFW to MCO. Even if it included a $3 meal and a $.75 paper ticket.
Under regulation I probably would have a choice of 3 flights instead of 50 +. There are a whole lot more pilots flying those 50 flights than there were flying those 3 flights. A whole lot more people riding too. They may not meet your standards, but they are spending money.
Service does count. When I go to MCO I fly on NW at a little premium because I don't like the SWA cattle call. If it was a big premium I would probably take SW.
Last edited by FDXLAG; 03-29-2007 at 07:31 AM.
#80
Good,
I would rather not pay $475 to go DFW to MCO. Even if it included a $3 meal and a $.75 paper ticket.
Under regulation I probably would have a choice of 3 flights instead of 50 +. There are a whole lot more pilots flying those 50 flights than there were flying those 3 flights..
I would rather not pay $475 to go DFW to MCO. Even if it included a $3 meal and a $.75 paper ticket.
Under regulation I probably would have a choice of 3 flights instead of 50 +. There are a whole lot more pilots flying those 50 flights than there were flying those 3 flights..
Once a B6 or Skybus proves that pilots will sell themselves for those rates, the other carriers have to match. Some use bankruptcy court, others use arbitrators. But the overall wages sink to the lowest common denominator and right now, that's jetBlue. Soon it will be Skybus.
Eventually, with Open Skies, you'll have a bunch of Chinese or Indian airlines flying from BWA to ORL. There will be 50 flights a day, as you put it, with ZERO American pilots on the flight decks.
But the consumer will be happy. The WalMartization of the airline business is about to start in earnest.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post