Don't Follow Your Passion
#71
Actually...$130K is IMO a good round number assuming...
Spouse
2x Kids (college bound)
House (slightly bigger than average)
Possible vacation home (can also serve as investment vehicle)
2x Car (somewhat nicer than a Ford Fiesta)
Interest in life experiences (vacations, foreign exchange, etc)
Need for retirement income above and beyond social security
Hobbies (some can be very cheap, ie computer gaming, but let's assume maybe a boat, motorcycle, etc)
"Average" cost of living area
You can get by with less current income if you have a good defined-benefit retirement plan w/ medical.
Spouse
2x Kids (college bound)
House (slightly bigger than average)
Possible vacation home (can also serve as investment vehicle)
2x Car (somewhat nicer than a Ford Fiesta)
Interest in life experiences (vacations, foreign exchange, etc)
Need for retirement income above and beyond social security
Hobbies (some can be very cheap, ie computer gaming, but let's assume maybe a boat, motorcycle, etc)
"Average" cost of living area
You can get by with less current income if you have a good defined-benefit retirement plan w/ medical.
#72
I had a long and detailed response to your last post but I decided it wasn't even worth trying to say the same hings over and over to you again like I, and others, have to Sky. If Sky's opinion is now your contention too - so be it. Run with it and have a fine time.
I've never said anything other than what you say is the few following quotes from you response to JB:
I've said all those things a hundred times Cub and you know it.
It isn't our calling him out on his hyperbole that exaberates his posting; he come on every so often so make the same tired statmeents aover and over again. Some have decide to rebut time and time gain. Just each other's opinions right? Maybe it is he would 'points fingers and makes mad' the people who are tired of reading the same exaggerations over and over. Ever consider that?
As far as my compassion for fellow professional pilots Cub - - - I've been plenty compassionate about your struggles in the industry the entire time haven't I? You don't have a need to worry about me.
As for this statement:
If you'd like to respond to this then I'd like you to provide an example where I have ever said that there shouldn't be some 'fairness and equality'.
I've never said anything other than what you say is the few following quotes from you response to JB:
some of SH's arguments are valid and some are really just hyperbole, and that has always been my problem with him.
He seems to think that making a valid point requires tacking on various extractions
He then loses credibility
because they see what he is doing and want to hear the truth and here is all this hyperbole.
When you guys point fingers at SH and get mad and call foul on him, all you do is exacerbate his tendency to make more hyperbole. I always saw through that and observed some underlying merit to his basic point about inequal pay for equal sacrifice. He is right about that and it is a message that needs getting out.
It isn't our calling him out on his hyperbole that exaberates his posting; he come on every so often so make the same tired statmeents aover and over again. Some have decide to rebut time and time gain. Just each other's opinions right? Maybe it is he would 'points fingers and makes mad' the people who are tired of reading the same exaggerations over and over. Ever consider that?
As far as my compassion for fellow professional pilots Cub - - - I've been plenty compassionate about your struggles in the industry the entire time haven't I? You don't have a need to worry about me.
As for this statement:
you should want for fairness and equality where fairness and equality are justified
#73
Disinterested Third Party
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,260
I looked at that figure briefly, and it appears to be something the IRS uses to determine taxes. SH usually argues for a certain standard of living when he quotes salary figures, and I did not see any standard of living tied to that IRS number. If you did, I am sure it would be a lot higher. You have to qualify an income to a particular standard of living for it to be of much use. Start with middle class, for example. Pilots usually aspire to be at least middle-middle and some want to reach upper middle class. They get paid about what it takes to maintain less than that in the examples found with most regional airline pilots.
Given the wild nature of the assertions, "hyperbole" as you suggest, there's no need to delve further into his shot credibility.
#74
#75
Disinterested Third Party
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,260
Do they?
The link provided previously, however, cites the national average wage at 44,000 plus change; a third of skyhigh's lofty "bare minimum figure."
44,000 as an average, then would perhaps not be the "median," or middle of the income values, but would represent a much larger number of people, with more under that value than over.
There are a LOT of people living below the poverty line in this country; to express the arrogant view that 130,000 is a bare minimum to get by today shows one who is not in touch with reality.
The link provided previously, however, cites the national average wage at 44,000 plus change; a third of skyhigh's lofty "bare minimum figure."
44,000 as an average, then would perhaps not be the "median," or middle of the income values, but would represent a much larger number of people, with more under that value than over.
There are a LOT of people living below the poverty line in this country; to express the arrogant view that 130,000 is a bare minimum to get by today shows one who is not in touch with reality.
#76
I've said all those things a hundred times Cub and you know it.
It isn't our calling him out on his hyperbole that exacerbates his posting; he comes on every so often to make the same tired statements over and over again. Some have decided to rebut time and time gain. Just each other's opinions right? Maybe it is he would 'points fingers and makes mad' the people who are tired of reading the same exaggerations over and over. Ever consider that?
It isn't our calling him out on his hyperbole that exacerbates his posting; he comes on every so often to make the same tired statements over and over again. Some have decided to rebut time and time gain. Just each other's opinions right? Maybe it is he would 'points fingers and makes mad' the people who are tired of reading the same exaggerations over and over. Ever consider that?
...As far as my compassion for fellow professional pilots Cub - - - I've been plenty compassionate about your struggles in the industry the entire time haven't I? You don't have a need to worry about me...
...you should want for fairness and equality where fairness and equality are justified...
If you'd like to respond to this then I'd like you to provide an example where I have ever said that there shouldn't be some 'fairness and equality'.
#77
Disinterested Third Party
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,260
Where's the crisis?
Regionals are an entry level job, and is is a sad fact that many without experience move to a major airline with their regional background as their only fundamental. Scary thought. Those doing so often think they know the industry, when in fact they've seen nearly nothing of it. People graduate from regionals to the majors when they have an opportunity not because it's the path to the majors, but because they hired into the regional as a know-nothing neophyte and have been nowhere else. Many gain valuable experience elsewhere, that they can bring to the table.
#78
...I saw that a lot of what he was saying was accurate- in particular the part about low pay, weak unions, job instability and shabby quality of life. I started recognizing the depth of the labor exploitation going on in the low end of domestic commercial aviation and how intractable the problem is.
I see a need for a simple story line sticking to the real facts and leaving out the drama. When you rebut SH we run the risk of missing the useful part of his message.
The main thing I am sorry to see here is that SH means well and has a good message for everyone, but screws it up by adding a lot drama that he shouldn't.
A negative overall perspective on this career is not a very good message to put out here even if you believe it. I just want SH to get fair enough treatment when he tells why he quit.
You never said something so direct but you take SH too seriously for his rhetoric, and fail to see the useful part of his input.
SH gives a real life story of his own failed career. I think his story parallels far too many others like him, and at the risk of being accusative, I think if you had tackled some of the crappy flying jobs he had you might feel a bit sympathetic to his final outcome.
Life Cub....freaking life.
#79
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,473
PPL to legacy job was 19 years for me. I worked as an A&P and flew as much as possible in that time frame. Life,bills, furloughs, divorce, got in the way. Often flew 7 days a week doing 135 cargo and skydivers just scraping by. Made a lot of sacrifices. It was a long and sometimes difficult road, but I'm glad I followed it. Not saying that it works out for everyone, but the only way to find out is to give it a shot.
#80
The way I was brought up, you do not condemn the loser just for being the loser. Most people here seem to condemn SH for quitting the industry as though he made an insincere attempt. From his story it sounds as if he put plenty of good faith and time into the effort, and still could not pay his family bills. As such, he had a valid reason to quit and also has a useful message for those who are still here trying for the stars- you may not get to the brass ring despite your best efforts and time to the contrary. I for one enjoy hearing SH's past struggles because they were real life lessons, and I encourage him to participate here in some way even now as a GA pilot.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post