If being a pilot is so bad...
#91
The age 30 thing was before my time. But according to this guy I knew, he did not get the job at United because they told him straight up he was too old. I think he was early 30's at the time it was the late 70's.
Last edited by Ski Patrol; 01-24-2009 at 08:28 AM. Reason: Age
#92
[quote=SkyHigh;543970]
I do not have a research department. If it is really that important to you why don't you ask an airline pilot who is older than 50 and see what they remember from that time.
Also people on this forum love to come out of the woodwork and jump all over me when my recollection of fact is less than perfectly accurate. Often when there is not a rush of opposition in response to a post of mine that uses factual information the following silence itself is self evident of accuracy.
If nothing else DE727UPS should have something to say. He never lets me slide on anything.
Skyhigh
Oh no dear Sky. It is not I that needs to research as I am not the one making false claims and passing them as fact.
USMCFLYR
I do not have a research department. If it is really that important to you why don't you ask an airline pilot who is older than 50 and see what they remember from that time.
Also people on this forum love to come out of the woodwork and jump all over me when my recollection of fact is less than perfectly accurate. Often when there is not a rush of opposition in response to a post of mine that uses factual information the following silence itself is self evident of accuracy.
If nothing else DE727UPS should have something to say. He never lets me slide on anything.
Skyhigh
USMCFLYR
#93
Well then, at least will you pm USMCFLYR and tell him in private that I was right? We don't want the poor guy loose with mis-information do we?
My point is that if I post something that may not be exactly right in your eyes then you are quick to jump on me and try to rub my face in it. However when I am dead on accurate or cleanly win a debate only silence remains to hail my victory.
You never come back with a, "good job skyhigh" or a "you really nailed me with that one". A pat on the back once in a while would be nice that is all.
SkyHigh
My point is that if I post something that may not be exactly right in your eyes then you are quick to jump on me and try to rub my face in it. However when I am dead on accurate or cleanly win a debate only silence remains to hail my victory.
You never come back with a, "good job skyhigh" or a "you really nailed me with that one". A pat on the back once in a while would be nice that is all.
SkyHigh
USMCFLYR
#94
"You never come back with a, "good job skyhigh" or a "you really nailed me with that one". A pat on the back once in a while would be nice that is all."
Good job, USMC, you have clearly won this debate. I pat you on the back....
Good job, USMC, you have clearly won this debate. I pat you on the back....
#95
Lost to time
I asked you to point me to some factual information Sky. If it is true then I want to see it. Sorry Sky - but for all of your wordly knowledge, I don't take WELL SKY SAID IT as factual. You don't need DE providing your data. Just point me to some historical data or something. If it was indeed true and pilots (especially military pilots) didn't get hired on if they we re older than 30 then I will come back on this very thread and say that you were right.
USMCFLYR
USMCFLYR
Statement:
Up until the late 1980's legacy airlines turned all pilots away who were older than 30, had less than 20/20 vision and were not height and weight proportional.
DE727UPS has yet to deny it because he knows that it is an accurate statement. Why don't you ask him?
SkyHigh
#96
Fat
I remember well that United Airlines had a height and weight chart that they published. There were strict weight limitations that had to be met. They also had vision and other health requirements. A local woman pilot likes to tell of how she was rejected from Alaska Airlines because they thought that she was too short.
It seems crazy from today's perspective however in the past airlines screened heavily on physical attributes and less on pilot experience. Since discrimination laws have come into effect they hired just about anyone. People who are, fat, short, wear thick glasses or are disabled can even get hired now as commercial airline pilots. Old timers have had the maximum age pushed to 65 and probably will have it erased altogether in the next ten years.
What an age we now live in. As a result the airlines today have to use other measures to screen applicants like astronomical minimums for some and nepotism for others.
Skyhigh
It seems crazy from today's perspective however in the past airlines screened heavily on physical attributes and less on pilot experience. Since discrimination laws have come into effect they hired just about anyone. People who are, fat, short, wear thick glasses or are disabled can even get hired now as commercial airline pilots. Old timers have had the maximum age pushed to 65 and probably will have it erased altogether in the next ten years.
What an age we now live in. As a result the airlines today have to use other measures to screen applicants like astronomical minimums for some and nepotism for others.
Skyhigh
#97
Line Holder
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 67
In regards to the military pilot versus 30 cut off point, 30 was a real cut off for most carriers. Back then(in the early 70s) the obligation was 3 to 3.5 years after wings, at least Marines/navy, so you'd have a narrow window of opportunity after release. What you flew was of prime importance because the airlines weren't interested in certain airframes so recovery time was minimal. Keep in mind these were the days when stewardesses had to be gone by 35 and had to weigh less than the airplane.
#98
Man I wish I could find some of this stuff and have hard data for you and many others here. It is difficult to find. Like I said before I do not have a researchers working for me to dig up references and factual data for every post. No one else is asked to do that either. On the occasion that I do have a reference most choose to ignore it anyway. Therefore you will either have to accept my statements or search it out for yourself.
Statement:
Up until the late 1980's legacy airlines turned all pilots away who were older than 30, had less than 20/20 vision and were not height and weight proportional.
DE727UPS has yet to deny it because he knows that it is an accurate statement. Why don't you ask him?
SkyHigh
Statement:
Up until the late 1980's legacy airlines turned all pilots away who were older than 30, had less than 20/20 vision and were not height and weight proportional.
DE727UPS has yet to deny it because he knows that it is an accurate statement. Why don't you ask him?
SkyHigh
The above has nothing to do with the military Sky. Quit dodging the question. to refresh you - we are not talking about about the 30 year old question or the 20/20 vision. I've laready said that I don't know one way or another. I asked you if it applied to the military poilots who stayed longer than one year or got out after multiple tours but before retirement.
The factual information I asked you for was your assertion that most military pilots got out after one tour to fly for the airlines. I even asked you for the scene out of the movie which you have not provided yet.
USMCFLYR
#99
No USMC, it's a fact. If you watch "An Officier and a Gentlelman" Richard Gere's sargent major screams "Before any of you pleebs gets to United Airlines, you gotta get through me". Therefore, all military pilots back in those days just did one tour to get to the airlines. What more research do you want? Watch the movie....
#100
No USMC, it's a fact. If you watch "An Officier and a Gentlelman" Richard Gere's sargent major screams "Before any of you pleebs gets to United Airlines, you gotta get through me". Therefore, all military pilots back in those days just did one tour to get to the airlines. What more research do you want? Watch the movie....
USMCFLYR
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post