Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo > Kalitta Companies
Kalitta Air B-747 goes off the runway! >

Kalitta Air B-747 goes off the runway!

Search

Notices

Kalitta Air B-747 goes off the runway!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-27-2008, 10:34 AM
  #61  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: 757/767 FO
Posts: 847
Default

Originally Posted by A320 Pilot
Enemy would be a better term instead of bad guys,my point is there are a few countries out there that have the capability,try askin if you have some friends in the Air Force about how they performed against some of these airforces when they conducted joint air exercises and you will be surprised.Russians also have a lot of intimidating stuff like Akulas,SUs,Bears,Smerch and Topols.
Great, an armchair airpower expert.

I am in the Air Force.

Bears? Aren't they older than the B-52s you just badmouthed a few posts ago? oops.
Spaceman Spliff is offline  
Old 05-27-2008, 10:36 AM
  #62  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 60
Default

Originally Posted by Spaceman Spliff
Great, an armchair airpower expert.

I am in the Air Force.
Yawn and I fly JSF
A320 Pilot is offline  
Old 05-27-2008, 10:45 AM
  #63  
Line Holder
 
E ThePilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2008
Position: Contract
Posts: 37
Default

Originally Posted by A320 Pilot
Yawn and I fly JSF
LOL....thanks for the laughs.
E ThePilot is offline  
Old 05-27-2008, 10:46 AM
  #64  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 60
Default

Originally Posted by Spaceman Spliff
Great, an armchair airpower expert.

I am in the Air Force.

Bears? Aren't they older than the B-52s you just badmouthed a few posts ago? oops.
I guess you need to take English lessons all over again GENERAL,I never badmouthed B52s,I said that airlines need to overhaul their fleets and I dont think that any airline is operating B52s unless you are aware of one General
A320 Pilot is offline  
Old 05-27-2008, 10:49 AM
  #65  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 60
Default

Originally Posted by Spaceman Spliff
Great, an armchair airpower expert.

I am in the Air Force.

Bears? Aren't they older than the B-52s you just badmouthed a few posts ago? oops.
Your Avatar says it allGeneral, anyways lets stick to the topic.
A320 Pilot is offline  
Old 05-27-2008, 11:00 AM
  #66  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MaydayMark's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: MD-11 Captain
Posts: 4,304
Default

Originally Posted by A320 Pilot
I was offered a position on 747-400 for the best rated airline in the world but I picked A320(flying for the same airline)and I am not going to specify the reasons as I dont want to start Airbus vs Boeing contest over here and take this thread in a whole different direction.
I've suspected that you weren't a real pilot but this posting proves it. It depends which customer service survey you pick as to which airline is "the best rated airline in the world" but the likely candidates are Emirates, Cathay, and Singapore. All of those airlines fly the 747-400. None of those airlines fly the A320. I suspect you're some aviation enthusiast that wishes he was a pilot. Maybe you can find the cause of the Kalitta 747-200 crash in your spare time. I'm sure the "professional" accident investigators would appreciate your help.

Also, I was wondering if you are available to tutor me for my next check ride? Thanks in advance
MaydayMark is offline  
Old 05-27-2008, 11:07 AM
  #67  
Gets Weekends Off
 
stinsonjr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 919
Default

Originally Posted by Spaceman Spliff
Not a stupid question at all...Basically, takeoff speeds for 3+ engine aircraft are based on the loss of one outboard engine.

In the 4-engine aircraft I flew...if you lost two engines after V1 (it was not uncommon to have a 40 knot split between V1 and Vr), you just became a test pilot.

Luckily, it's pretty rare, but it has happened (flock of birds on climbout took out both engines on one side). In that situation, I do not believe they survived.
Thank you very much for the response. I would have figured there would be something other than "be sure to let us know how it turns out" if you lost more than one

Do they ever let you do something like this in a sim? My guess (and keep my ignorance in mind) is that if you lost two (of four) on the same side, you would simply pull the remaining two back and go straight ahead due to lack of directional control. Thanks for the answer...and thanks for defending the B-52 - still a fearsome beast.
stinsonjr is offline  
Old 05-27-2008, 11:24 AM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
freightdawg's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 747-400 FO
Posts: 123
Default

Originally Posted by A320 Pilot

Most of third world countries in Asia dont even fly a/cs like 747 200s or 300s or the so called SUPER MD 80s.I know you come from an era when there were no glass cockpits or fly by wire and you wre expected to build an entire airplane your self,but its time to move on and embrace the modern technology.
I do understand your enthusiasm for the modern aircraft, yet at the same time I'd suggest there's more "classic" aircraft out in the commercial sector there than you'd believe. To wit, look around in current fleets listed on this and other websites:

Alitalia MD-80 78
Cathay Pacific 747-200F 7
Quantas 747-300 4
JAL 747-300 8
747-200 3

The classic 747 is alive although not necessarily well. For that matter, look for DC8's and 707s. I found this with about a 15 minute search.

Yes, the new technology is wonderful, but in many cases, either a fleet cannot afford to update, or the older aircraft can still make money - so why change if nobody's forcing them? Why park aircraft that are still profitable while you're waiting for the new stuff?
freightdawg is offline  
Old 05-27-2008, 11:56 AM
  #69  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,497
Default

The check airmen do a 3-engine take off and lose another on the same side at about gear-up during recurrent sim. It keeps them current for 3-engine ferry flights. I was flying support and it sure looked like a lot of work though he got it down fine in the end. The weight was pretty low though not like a heavy take-off.
Rama is online now  
Old 05-27-2008, 12:08 PM
  #70  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 60
Default

Originally Posted by MaydayMark
I've suspected that you weren't a real pilot but this posting proves it. It depends which customer service survey you pick as to which airline is "the best rated airline in the world" but the likely candidates are Emirates, Cathay, and Singapore. All of those airlines fly the 747-400. None of those airlines fly the A320. I suspect you're some aviation enthusiast that wishes he was a pilot. Maybe you can find the cause of the Kalitta 747-200 crash in your spare time. I'm sure the "professional" accident investigators would appreciate your help.

Also, I was wondering if you are available to tutor me for my next check ride? Thanks in advance
O.K.REAL PILOT do a search on Singapore Airlines Group and you will find an airline known as SILK AIR which is part of SIA group and operates A320s.I just tutored you on Singapore Airlines Group atleast.
A320 Pilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Deez340
Regional
160
05-06-2008 10:41 PM
Jurassic Jet
Cargo
26
11-15-2007 08:16 AM
Lbell911
Major
29
07-31-2007 06:02 PM
Sir James
Hangar Talk
0
08-04-2005 05:31 PM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
0
07-09-2005 10:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices