Search

Notices

Got the call!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-07-2007, 05:16 PM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Pilot_135's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: XL/XLS, FO
Posts: 199
Default

Originally Posted by FlyingA320
best of luck Pilot_135 and please post some gouges.
I'll post on aviationinterviews.com
Pilot_135 is offline  
Old 03-07-2007, 06:46 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FlyingA320's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2006
Position: A320 F/O
Posts: 167
Default

Originally Posted by Velocipede
Afraid that VA scam won't work out? Looking for another non-Union carrier bandwagon to jump on?
bla..bla..bla
FlyingA320 is offline  
Old 03-07-2007, 07:32 PM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RedeyeAV8r's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,838
Default

Originally Posted by jungleguppy
I think you have an over optimistic opinion of what a union is capable of. No union, ALPA or otherwise, can walk into the CEO’s office and demand much of anything. It is called negotiation for a reason, neither side gets exactly what they want. Even when a pilot group has a collective bargaining agreement, it is only as good as the management that respects it. Ask some Mesa guys how well their contract is enforced. For that matter, Go-jet has a union, how’s that going? As long a management at B6 is willing to make changes for the better, and actually get it done…

It seems to me that most of the people who complain about B6 the most, are not the people working here.

Actually I have a very balanced and experienced viewpoint.
I have worked at both Union carriers and Non-union.

If you have a Union, you have the legal right to negotiate a legally binding deal.

If you don't have a Union, you don't. You are at "AT will" employee. You can ask (Beg for changes) but they are at the whim of MGT. And MGT can change it's mind any time they want. With a Union and a contact it is much more difficult for Managment to impose changes. As of late we have witnessed MGT using the Bankruptcy laws and courts to do their negotiating for them. If you think what happened at AAA, DAL, United and NWA was bad, it would have been much worse had they not had Unions and contracts.

A Union is only as strong as it's membership. I can't speak for Mesa because I don't work there. If they have an ineffective Union, it is because they have a weak membership, in other words the members aren't willing to fight hard enough to get what they feel they deserve.

As long as you do not have high hopes for meaningful pay raises and work rules at B6 and I hope you do not see a merger or acquistion with a carrier who is represented by a Union.
I doubt you would be happy with the integration.
RedeyeAV8r is offline  
Old 03-07-2007, 09:25 PM
  #34  
Administrator
 
vagabond's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: C-172
Posts: 8,024
Default

Originally Posted by RedeyeAV8r
A Union is only as strong as it's membership. I can't speak for Mesa because I don't work there. If they have an ineffective Union, it is because they have a weak membership, in other words the members aren't willing to fight hard enough to get what they feel they deserve.
Redeye, I have been saying that until I am blue in the face. Thank you for adding your voice to this. Folks who do not understand what can be accomplished through a strong union advocating for them are doomed to scraping the bottom of the barrel. And do not forget the corollary "the membership is only as strong as its union."
vagabond is offline  
Old 03-08-2007, 05:49 AM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Position: A320
Posts: 406
Default

[QUOTE=Short Bus Drive;129461]
........If you can't get it up in the flight deck...........


this might get you some funny looks if you try
greedyairlineexec is offline  
Old 03-13-2007, 09:22 PM
  #36  
Line Holder
 
crgok9's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: CA
Posts: 72
Default

Just like ALPA to take the scabs back.
crgok9 is offline  
Old 03-29-2007, 06:30 AM
  #37  
Line Holder
 
crgok9's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: CA
Posts: 72
Default

Originally Posted by RedeyeAV8r
Actually I have a very balanced and experienced viewpoint.
I have worked at both Union carriers and Non-union.

If you have a Union, you have the legal right to negotiate a legally binding deal.

If you don't have a Union, you don't. You are at "AT will" employee. You can ask (Beg for changes) but they are at the whim of MGT. And MGT can change it's mind any time they want. With a Union and a contact it is much more difficult for Managment to impose changes. As of late we have witnessed MGT using the Bankruptcy laws and courts to do their negotiating for them. If you think what happened at AAA, DAL, United and NWA was bad, it would have been much worse had they not had Unions and contracts.

A Union is only as strong as it's membership. I can't speak for Mesa because I don't work there. If they have an ineffective Union, it is because they have a weak membership, in other words the members aren't willing to fight hard enough to get what they feel they deserve.

As long as you do not have high hopes for meaningful pay raises and work rules at B6 and I hope you do not see a merger or acquistion with a carrier who is represented by a Union.
I doubt you would be happy with the integration.

I agree with much of what you have to say R. However, in every case of a union carrier having their contracts declared "null and void" by the courts makes them essentially a "non union" carrier now...just like B6. In all comparisons to A320 pay scales of bankrupt carriers the B6 pay exceeds their current pay scales. That being said, when they come back their pay will start to climb again but the battle will be a very long and drawn out battle. Meanwhile, B6 continues to be paid a higher wage without the battle...for now. I guess technically none of these carriers are still in bankruptcy. However, their pay scales are still sitting at bankrupt levels...below B6.
crgok9 is offline  
Old 03-31-2007, 07:34 AM
  #38  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: C-5
Posts: 17
Unhappy I just got the call too...

Just got a call for an interview....unfortunately I am sitting in the desert...had to postpone until May...
Damifinou is offline  
Old 03-31-2007, 07:58 AM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SabreDriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: The Right One
Posts: 588
Default

Originally Posted by crgok9
I agree with much of what you have to say R. However, in every case of a union carrier having their contracts declared "null and void" by the courts makes them essentially a "non union" carrier now...just like B6. In all comparisons to A320 pay scales of bankrupt carriers the B6 pay exceeds their current pay scales. That being said, when they come back their pay will start to climb again but the battle will be a very long and drawn out battle. Meanwhile, B6 continues to be paid a higher wage without the battle...for now. I guess technically none of these carriers are still in bankruptcy. However, their pay scales are still sitting at bankrupt levels...below B6.


And without having to pay dues......

Won't know if I made the right decision till I'm 60 sumtin.....
SabreDriver is offline  
Old 03-31-2007, 08:27 AM
  #40  
SNAFU
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

At least it would take a court to throw out the contract. There is nothing keeping jB from reducing your wages as easily as they raised them.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jwes
Major
82
04-26-2007 06:16 PM
UNDGUY
Regional
16
01-09-2007 12:40 PM
miker1369
Hangar Talk
1
11-11-2006 04:17 PM
dash trash
Regional
1
02-27-2006 07:50 PM
ERJ135
Hangar Talk
1
11-16-2005 04:50 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices