Contract Talks
#71
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Posts: 591
Expected is indeed required.
Lots of insurance plans have expected language which requires you to take reasonable care.
But that is contract law.
The BlueBook and other manuals are employment law and with this the employer gets to define 'intent' of the language.
"Expected" is required. Doubt that then call Grievance chairs.
Lots of insurance plans have expected language which requires you to take reasonable care.
But that is contract law.
The BlueBook and other manuals are employment law and with this the employer gets to define 'intent' of the language.
"Expected" is required. Doubt that then call Grievance chairs.
#72
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Posts: 212
So a couple weeks ago some FAs I was flying with were talking about some JB inflight FB page that they post comments about unruly pax etc. I joined the page thinking it would be entertaining reading regarding the drama in the back. Didn't take long to see the high and mighty comments about how if pilots aren't willing to help clean they have no problem reporting them. Yay. Thanks blue glove monitor guy... Haven't heard of anyone getting called to the carpet yet but apparently they're reporting us if they don't see us helping. Awesome. Nothing like missing my shuttle etc because I rushed off the plane trying to make transportation instead of dumpster diving... Didn't realize when I came here there would be an US vs THEM mentality between pilots and inflight. Certainly none of that was hinted at during indoc-we are one big blue family lol. Not so much! Disappointing to say the least...
#73
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 468
Never clean on duty including deadheading. There is no basis in any manual to have us clean while on duty. JetBlue has a bazillion flight attendants, and I'm usually flying 1 or 2 legs with them, and I'll likely never see them again for months if not years. I don't give a crap if any of them gives me the stink eye, or says something to me.
When non-revving it doesn't specify how much you should clean, what constitutes cleaning, how much time you should spend cleaning, nor that any inflight crew sees you clean or verifies that you clean.
Armrest up? Well looks like I've done my part to help the "blue turn"
Make sure MY garbage is thrown away? Well, looks like I've done my part to help the "blue turn"
When non-revving it doesn't specify how much you should clean, what constitutes cleaning, how much time you should spend cleaning, nor that any inflight crew sees you clean or verifies that you clean.
Armrest up? Well looks like I've done my part to help the "blue turn"
Make sure MY garbage is thrown away? Well, looks like I've done my part to help the "blue turn"
#74
Not A Janitor
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 814
Ok, so here's the deal.
Yes, the FOM specifically says cleaning is not required while on duty.
However, in the the spirit of the CARING and INTEGRITY VALUES, BlewJet has fostered--actually, intentionally created--an adversarial relationship between FAs and pilots by planting in their impressionable heads that the pilots are expected to assist with the "Blew Turn" and that the pilots aren't living our faux values if they do not assist. This, in turn, leads to a breakdown in CRM and safety by creating an us versus them mentality which is completely unnecessary and unavoidable.
It is this peer pressure that leads normally rational non-juicers to don the gloves and dumpster dive in back. (I facepalm so hard when I see a lanyard-wearer playing janitor in the back. You expect it from the juicers, but f#*k, come on man!)
So you're right, it is not a codified requirement, but a de facto one in the eyes of everyone but those of us who are familiar with the FOM language.
Just another example of how utterly fake and fraudulent the "core values" are.
Yes, the FOM specifically says cleaning is not required while on duty.
However, in the the spirit of the CARING and INTEGRITY VALUES, BlewJet has fostered--actually, intentionally created--an adversarial relationship between FAs and pilots by planting in their impressionable heads that the pilots are expected to assist with the "Blew Turn" and that the pilots aren't living our faux values if they do not assist. This, in turn, leads to a breakdown in CRM and safety by creating an us versus them mentality which is completely unnecessary and unavoidable.
It is this peer pressure that leads normally rational non-juicers to don the gloves and dumpster dive in back. (I facepalm so hard when I see a lanyard-wearer playing janitor in the back. You expect it from the juicers, but f#*k, come on man!)
So you're right, it is not a codified requirement, but a de facto one in the eyes of everyone but those of us who are familiar with the FOM language.
Just another example of how utterly fake and fraudulent the "core values" are.
#75
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Posts: 252
There's always a Loophole fellas/gals. We are (90%) of the time are NOT pass riding! Going to and from work I am not on a pass. I am JUMPSEATING. A privilege given to us as pilots. I check in with the captain and ask for a rid. Nowhere does it say anything about jumpseaters. Ask yourselves, would you order a beer in uniform commuting home from work in uniform, then why clean in uniform.
I always ask the Inflight if I can get there bags down from the overhead, and the majority are way happier with that than watching us clean. Every law break or preflight briefing, I'll tell the inflight prior, I'll do anything for you guys/gals but I'm not cleaning. Confrontation is defused
I always ask the Inflight if I can get there bags down from the overhead, and the majority are way happier with that than watching us clean. Every law break or preflight briefing, I'll tell the inflight prior, I'll do anything for you guys/gals but I'm not cleaning. Confrontation is defused
#77
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Position: 190 captain and “Pro-pilot”
Posts: 2,931
So a couple weeks ago some FAs I was flying with were talking about some JB inflight FB page that they post comments about unruly pax etc. I joined the page thinking it would be entertaining reading regarding the drama in the back. Didn't take long to see the high and mighty comments about how if pilots aren't willing to help clean they have no problem reporting them. Yay. Thanks blue glove monitor guy... Haven't heard of anyone getting called to the carpet yet but apparently they're reporting us if they don't see us helping. Awesome. Nothing like missing my shuttle etc because I rushed off the plane trying to make transportation instead of dumpster diving... Didn't realize when I came here there would be an US vs THEM mentality between pilots and inflight. Certainly none of that was hinted at during indoc-we are one big blue family lol. Not so much! Disappointing to say the least...
Oh my
Rule 1 never join an FA FB page
Rule 2 FAs are the same everywhere
You know the mob is a "family operation" as well. You see what happens there.
#78
I really wish our Union, for 1.9%, would stop telling us "do what you believe is right". Right or wrong has no bearing on the matter. Legal or illegal doesn't care about right or wrong (morally or ethically).
What are we LEGALLY obligated to do?, and WHY (legal reasons)?
How can we resist if we don't know the legalities? Has ALPA bothered to ask a lawyer on staff this question? For 1.9%+, we deserve a legal interpretation that we can go to court with sent out officially by ALPA without using nebulous phrases such as "do what you think is right".
What are we LEGALLY obligated to do?, and WHY (legal reasons)?
How can we resist if we don't know the legalities? Has ALPA bothered to ask a lawyer on staff this question? For 1.9%+, we deserve a legal interpretation that we can go to court with sent out officially by ALPA without using nebulous phrases such as "do what you think is right".
#79
It's not in the FOM that I must clean, it's not our job period, end of story. Pass riding is not my job, nor yours.
Some anecdote of some FA on some flight giving you grief is neither here nor there. She's not our boss, the FAA or the writer of our FOM. If fear of being "that guy" enters your head, i fear you're not capable of making responsible decisions in the cockpit. Being "that guy" is part of the job, carrying out unpopular decisions is a necessity in this business.
Some anecdote of some FA on some flight giving you grief is neither here nor there. She's not our boss, the FAA or the writer of our FOM. If fear of being "that guy" enters your head, i fear you're not capable of making responsible decisions in the cockpit. Being "that guy" is part of the job, carrying out unpopular decisions is a necessity in this business.
#80
Otherwise, it's management 101 smoke and mirrors for the uninitiated to believe in.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post